scholarly journals Rolefulness and Interpersonal Relationships

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daiki Kato ◽  
Mikie Suzuki

We developed the new psychological concept of Rolefulness and it is a defined as “the continuous sense of role satisfaction we have in our daily lives.” Rolefulness includes 2 sub factors of “social rolefulness” and “internal rolefulness.” Social rolefulness is role satisfaction based on social experiences such as interpersonal relationships. Internal rolefulness is a role satisfaction that is formed by internalizing social rolefulness and it includes identity and confidence. First, we introduce the theoretical background and developmental process of rolefulness. Second, the statistical study of relationship between rolefulness and maladjustment is shown. Then, the example of application in the area of education and art therapy is introduced. Finally, the future application of rolefulness for our social lives and social science studies is discussed.

Author(s):  
Helen Goddard ◽  
Anna Cook

AbstractAutistic university students face extra challenges in both their academic and social life. Barriers to socialising appear to be less well understood and supported by universities than academic requirements. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten autistic university students to explore their social experiences. Questions explored their social experiences, satisfaction with social life, disclosure of ASD to others, and the impact of mental wellbeing on university life. Thematic analysis indicated most participants were unsatisfied with their social lives and experienced mental health issues. Factors exacerbating social isolation included lack of suitable social events, lack of social support and feeling unable to disclose to peers. Factors which reduced social isolation included joining an autism or special interest society and receiving social mentoring.


Author(s):  
Redactie KITLV

- T.W. Kamil, E.M. Uhlenbeck, De Systematiek der Javaanse Pronomina. Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, vol. XXX. ‘s-Gravenhage, Martinus Nijhoff, 1960. 63 p.- J. Noorduyn, Hans Kähler, Grammatik der Bahasa Indonésia, mit Chrestomathie und Wörterverzeichnis. Otto Harrassowitz. Wiesbaden 1956. VII + 307pp.- J.L. Swellengrebel, J.H. Hooykaas-v. Leeuwen Boomkamp, Ritual purification of a Balinese temple. Verhand. Kon. Nederl. Ak. v. Wetenschappen, Afd. Letterk., N.R. LXVIII, no. 4. 38 blz. tekst, 41 blz. afbeeldingen en register.- L. Kok, Bernhard H.M. Vlekke, Nusantara. A history of Indonesia. Wholly revised edition. W. van Hoeve Ltd, The Hague and Bandung, 1959; VIII, 479 p.- W. Ph. Coolhaas, B.H.M. Vlekke, Corrigenda op Nusantara, A history of Indonesia. Wholly revised edition. W. van Hoeve Ltd, The Hague and Bandung, 1959; VIII, 479 p.- S. Kooijman, C.A. Valentine, Masks and men in a Melanesian Society. The Valuku or Tubuan of the Lakalai of New Britain. University of Kansas Publications, Social Science Studies, 1961. Lawrence, Kansas, 76 pp., 2 kaarten, 18 foto’s en 3 kleurenproducties van tekeningen.- P. van Emst, A.P. Vayda, Maori warfare. Polynesian Society Maori Monographs No. 2. The Polynesian Society Inc. Wellington 1960. 141 pp.- ,


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 137
Author(s):  
James Young

International Journal of Social Science Studies (IJSSS) would like to thank the following reviewers for reviewing manuscripts from September 16, 2013, to March 31, 2014. Their comments and suggestions were of great help to the authors in improving the quality of their papers. Many authors, regardless of whether IJSSS publishes their work, appreciate the helpful feedback provided by the reviewers. Redfame Publishing appreciates the following reviewers’ rigorous and conscientious efforts for this journal. Each of the reviewers listed below returned at least one review during this period. Remigiusz Janusz Kijak Anna Maria Mouza Patricia Wiener Paulito Valeriano Hilario Michael Brooks Parveen Kaur Shani Bardach Luigia Simona Sica Raymond Chan Federica Palumbo Linda Chernus Mónica Martínez Gómez Joy D. Patton Mariano D. Perelman Zitha Mokomane Jamie Spinney Lee Pugalis Yaghoob Foroutan Maja Gori Ofer Katchergin Nina V Gunnarsson Roberto Franzini Tibaldeo Xue Bai Kimberly Schutte Shahadat Hossain Mei-Se Chien Mohammed Nasarat Laura K Taylor Sudershan Pasupuleti Suman Kasturi Russell Kabir Noraida Endt Suman Kasturi Maria Merino Quinn Keefer Flavia Cangia' Russell Kabir Aprinalistria Aprinalistria Begoña Montero-Fleta


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (a1) ◽  
pp. C1274-C1274
Author(s):  
Annalisa Guerri ◽  
Giovanna Scapin ◽  
Paola Spadon

2014 has been declared by UNESCO the International Year of Crystallography. Following the declaration, many initiatives have flourished with the intent of spreading the science and culture of crystallography, since among the major objectives of the IYCr2014 are increase of public awareness on the science of crystallography, promotion of education and research in all fields of crystallography and fostering of international collaborations. The International School of Crystallography is an internationally recognized meeting that was started in 1974 by Prof. Riva di Sanseverino, with the similar goals of promoting high level crystallographic education, scientific exchanges and collaborations. In 2014 the school celebrates its 40th year of activity. During these forty years, courses have been held on many different topics addressing all aspects of crystallography, from crystal growth theory to practical applications in drug discovery to the use of cutting edge technologies; students and teachers have been brought together in an environment that fostered high level scientific discussions as well as unique interpersonal relationships. Many of the students moved on to become well known personality in the crystallographic community, while retaining collaborations and friendships started during the School. Through these years the School teaching methods have also evolved, taking advantage of the fast technological progress of the past 10 years or so. The School offers both traditional lectures and practical computer-based workshops, to guarantee the students not only a theoretical background, but also hands-on experiences on applied crystallography. The dedication of the organizers and lecturers, the unconditioned support of the local staff, and the unique location of the School have made it a great success and a very popular meeting for generations of crystallographers.


Author(s):  
Janel E. Benson ◽  
Elizabeth M. Lee

Chapter 4 describes first-generation students in a Work Hard geography. These academically engaged students made not only classes and homework central to their daily lives, but their friendships and social lives also were often rooted in either academic work and/or nonathletic extracurricular interests. Work Hard students report close faculty relationships and strong friendships, often with those from similar demographic backgrounds, but they are also lonely outside those spheres, avoiding the high-status social hubs of campus. Most students in this geography came through Summer Bridge, and much of their campus engagement is in reaction to the racism, classism, and sexism they feel and observe on campus. They have created friendship communities that provide affirmation and support and crafted geographies that link their social, extracurricular, and academic priorities. The overlap of these spaces provides a buffer but does not connect these students to wealthier peers.


2021 ◽  
pp. 152-172
Author(s):  
R. Barker Bausell

The “mass” replications of multiple studies, some employing dozens of investigators distributed among myriad sites, is unique to the reproducibility movement. The most impressive of these initiatives was employed by the Open Science Collaboration directed by Brian Nosek, who recruited 270 investigators to participate in the replication of 100 psychological experiments via a very carefully structured, prespecified protocol that avoided questionable research practices. Just before this Herculean effort, two huge biotech firms (Amegen and Bayer Health Care) respectively conducted 53 and 67 preclinical replications of promising published studies to ascertain which results were worth pursuing for commercial applications. Amazingly, in less than a 10-year period, a number of other diverse multistudy replications were also conducted involving hundreds of effects. Among these were the three “many lab” multistudy replications based on the Open Science Model (but also designed to ascertain if potential confounders of the approach itself existed, such as differences in participant types, settings, and timing), replications of social science studies published in Science and Nature, experimental economics studies, and even self-reported replications ascertained from a survey. Somewhat surprisingly, the overall successful replication percentage for this diverse collection of 811 studies was 46%, mirroring the modeling results discussed in Chapter 3 and supportive of John Ioannidis’s pejorative and often quoted conclusion that most scientific results are incorrect.


2021 ◽  
pp. 213-232
Author(s):  
Peter Irons

This chapter examines the continuing disparities between Whites and Blacks through extensive social science data and studies of the impacts of systemic racism. It first utilizes what demographers call the dissimilarity index to measure housing segregation in major metropolitan areas; cities with heavily Black populations, such as Detroit, have become “hyper-segregated” with almost total “social isolation” of Blacks. The chapter then examines the long-standing academic and political debates over the causes of systemic racism, beginning in 1965 with a government report, The Negro Family: The Case for National Action, by a young Labor Department aide, Daniel Patrick “Pat” Moynihan. He found the main cause of Black poverty and increasing single Black motherhood in the “pathology” of a “matriarchal” Black family structure in which males are neither needed nor welcome. Moynihan’s report spurred an angry rebuttal in a book by psychology professor William Ryan, Blaming the Victim, which found the main cause of Black poverty in the systemic racism of White society and culture. The chapter then looks at social science studies by William Julius Wilson (explaining the “racial invariance” of White and Black crime); psychologist John Dollard (explaining the prevalence of Black-on-Black crime with the “frustration-aggression-displacement” theory); and Black psychiatrists William Grier and Price Cobbs (explaining “Black rage” as rooted in White control of institutions that exclude or discriminate against Blacks). The chapter concludes with a look at the War on Drugs of the 1980s and 1990s and the resulting mass incarceration of Black men.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document