scholarly journals Using Problem-Solving as a Method for the Development of Self-Regulation of Learning with Adolescents: An Experience Report

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovana Chimentão Punhagui
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Experience Report

scholarly journals The Role of Mental Effort in Fostering Self-Regulated Learning with Problem-Solving Tasks

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1055-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamara van Gog ◽  
Vincent Hoogerheide ◽  
Milou van Harsel
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Mental Effort ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Task Sequence ◽  
Self Monitoring ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
And Mathematics

Abstract Problem-solving tasks form the backbone of STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) curricula. Yet, how to improve self-monitoring and self-regulation when learning to solve problems has received relatively little attention in the self-regulated learning literature (as compared with, for instance, learning lists of items or learning from expository texts). Here, we review research on fostering self-regulated learning of problem-solving tasks, in which mental effort plays an important role. First, we review research showing that having students engage in effortful, generative learning activities while learning to solve problems can provide them with cues that help them improve self-monitoring and self-regulation at an item level (i.e., determining whether or not a certain type of problem needs further study/practice). Second, we turn to self-monitoring and self-regulation at the task sequence level (i.e., determining what an appropriate next problem-solving task would be given the current level of understanding/performance). We review research showing that teaching students to regulate their learning process by taking into account not only their performance but also their invested mental effort on a prior task when selecting a new task improves self-regulated learning outcomes (i.e., performance on a knowledge test in the domain of the study). Important directions for future research on the role of mental effort in (improving) self-monitoring and self-regulation at the item and task selection levels are discussed after the respective sections.

Collaborative Solution Discovery: A Problem Solving Process

2019 ◽  
pp. 100-103
Author(s):  
Katharine Clemmer
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Real Time ◽  
School System ◽  
Mathematical Thinking ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Math Learning ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Problem Solving Process ◽  
The Way

Loyola Marymount University (LMU) has developed a new approach to problem solving, Collaborative Solution Discovery (CSD), to help practitioners in a school system leverage their individual passions in a way that grows students’ positive math identity through mathematical thinking, problem solving, and self-regulation. By focusing on how students and teachers interact with each other in real-time in an ideal classroom, practitioners take ownership of a process to guide their students in growing their positive math identity and thus taking ownership of their own math learning. Practitioners measure progress along the way through metrics that are created, defined, used, and continually refined by themselves to attain their ideal math learning environment. The entire CSD process results in a system that owns ist improvement efforts—improvement efforts that are flexible, adaptable, and sustainable.

Assessing Self-regulation Development through Sharing Feedback in Online Mathematical Problem Solving Discussion

2010 ◽  
pp. 232-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bracha Kramarski
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
Social Feedback ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Metacognitive Teaching ◽  
Online Feedback

This study examined the relative efficacies of two different metacognitive teaching methods – problem solving (M_PS) and sharing knowledge (M_SK). Seventy-two Israeli sixth-grade students engaged in online mathematical problem solving and were each supported using one of the two aforementioned methods. M_PS students used a problem-solving and feedback process based on the IMPROVE model (Kramarski & Mevarech, 2003). In contrast, M_SK participants were instructed to reflect and provide feedback on the solution without an explicit model. This study evaluated each method‘s impact on the students’ mathematical online problem solving. It also examined self-regulated learning (SRL) processes by assessing students‘ online feedback using a rubric scheme. Findings indicated that M_PS students outperformed the M_SK students in algebraic knowledge and mathematical reasoning, as well as on various measures of sharing cognitive and metacognitive feedback. The M_SK students outperformed the M_PS students on measures of sharing motivational and social feedback.

Cognitive Early Education

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Carl Haywood
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Cognitive Development ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Executive Functions ◽  
Early Education ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Learning Tools ◽  
Mediated Learning ◽  
Cognition And Learning ◽  
The Mind

Cognitive early education, for children between ages 3 and 6 years, is designed to help learners develop and apply logic tools of systematic thinking, perceiving, learning, and problem-solving, usually as supplements to the content-oriented preschool and kindergarten curricula. Key concepts in cognitive early education include metacognition, executive functions, motivation, cognition, and learning. Most programs of cognitive early education are based on conceptions of cognitive development attributed to Jean Piaget, Lev S. Vygotsky, A. R. Luria, and Reuven Feuerstein. Piagetians and neoPiagetians hold that children must construct their personal repertoire of basic thinking processes on the basis of their early experience at gathering, assimilating, and reconciling knowledge. Vygotskians and neoVygotskians believe that cognitive development comes about through adults’ mediation of basic learning tools, which children internalize and apply. Adherents to Feuerstein’s concepts likewise accord a prominent role to mediated learning experiences. Followers of Luria believe that important styles of information processing underlie learning processes. Most programs emphasize, to varying degrees, habits of metacognition, that is, thinking about one’s own thinking as well as selecting and applying learning and problem-solving strategies. An important subset of metacognition is development and application of executive functions: self-regulation, management of one’s intellectual resources. Helping children to develop the motivation to learn and to derive satisfaction from information processing and learning is an important aspect of cognitive early education. Widely used programs of cognitive early education include Tools of the Mind, Bright Start, FIE-Basic, Des Procedures aux Concepts (DPC), PREP/COGENT, and Systematic Concept Teaching.

scholarly journals A Study on the Relationship Between Seventh-Grade Students’ Self-Regulation Skills and Their Problem-Solving Achievements

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 71
Author(s):  
Bünyamin Aydın ◽  
Dilek Sezgin Memnun ◽  
Emre Dinç ◽  
Sevgi Arsuk ◽  
Hilal Meriç
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Skill Development ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Positive Relationships ◽  
Seventh Grade ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Low Level ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Academic Year

This study aimed to determine the relationship between routine/non-routine problem-solving achievements and self-regulation skills of seventh-grade students who are educated in Turkey. For this purpose, in the 2016-2017 academic year, 133 seventh-grade students who were randomly selected in Denizli and Bursa provinces were studied. In the scope of the study, students were asked to answer routine/non-routine problem-solving tests, prepared by the researchers and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). When the data obtained from the analysis were examined, it was explained that the seventh-grade students attending the study need to develop their routine problem-solving skills and focus more on non-routine problem-solving skill development. Also, it was concluded that there are low-level and positive relationships between students’ routine problem-solving and self-regulation skills, and non-routine problem-solving and self-regulation skills.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document