scholarly journals Imaging in Suspected Appendicitis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime A. Fandiño Romero ◽  
Fernando Meléndez Negrette
Keyword(s):  
Suspected Appendicitis

Surgical Case

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (SPL1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Hameed Al-Badri
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Delay ◽  
Small Population ◽  
Negative Appendectomy ◽  
Time Cost ◽  
Voluntary Cough ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
Sharp Pain ◽  
Clinical Syndromes ◽  
Negative Appendectomy Rate ◽  
Classical Symptom

Appendicitis is a common and urgentsurgical illness with protean manifestations,generous overlap with other clinical syndromes,and significant morbidity,whichincreases with diagnostic delay. No single sign,symptom,or diagnostic test accurately confirms the diagnosis ofappendiceal inflammation in all cases. The surgeon's goals are to evaluate a relatively small population of patients referred for suspected appendicitis and to minimize the negative appendectomy rate without increasing the incidence of perforation. The emergency department clinician must evaluate the larger group of patients who present to the ED with abdominal pain of all etiologies with the goal of approaching 100% sensitivity for the diagnosis in a time-,cost-,and consultation-efficient manner.IN 1886Reginald fitz, pathologist 1st described the clinical condition of A.A.Fewyears laterCharles mcBurney describe the clinical finding ofA.A.55% of patients presented with classical symptom of A.A so complication occurbecauseof atypical presentation which due to variation in app. Position, age of patient & degree of inflammation.Migrating pain 80% sensitive and specific Vomiting 50% Nausea60 -90 %Anorexia 75 % Diarrhea18 % 32 % has similar attach 90 % RLQ tenderness Marklesign 74 %Dunphy's sign (sharp pain in the RLQ elicited by a voluntary cough) may be helpful in making the clinical diagnosis of localized peritonitis. Similarly,RLQ pain in response to percussion of a remote quadrant of the abdomen,or to firm percussion of the patient's heel,suggests peritoneal Inflammation

CT for suspected appendicitis in children: an analysis of diagnostic errors

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
George A. Taylor ◽  
Michael J. Callahan ◽  
Diana Rodriguez ◽  
Douglas S. Smink
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Errors ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis

MRI for Clinically Suspected Appendicitis During Pregnancy

2004 ◽  
Vol 183 (3) ◽  
pp. 671-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lodewijk P. Cobben ◽  
Ingrid Groot ◽  
Lucien Haans ◽  
Johan G. Blickman ◽  
Julien Puylaert
Keyword(s):  
Suspected Appendicitis

EP.FRI.615 Assessing the reliability of the Adult Appendicitis Score in managing patients with suspected acute appendicitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carry Zheng ◽  
Shiela Lee ◽  
Steven Brown ◽  
Venkat Kanakala
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Pathological Finding ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Histological Diagnosis ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Abstract Aims To evaluate the effectiveness of using a clinical prediction tool in the management of suspected acute appendicitis Methods Retrospective data was collected on patients undergoing appendicectomy at a single tertiary centre from November 2019 to June 2020. Inclusion criteria were all patients aged 18 and above undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Exclusion criteria were all patients that had a pathological finding other than appendicitis at laparoscopy. The pre operative AAS score at first presentation was calculated and patients grouped into low(0-10), intermediate(11-15), and high(16 and above) risk. These groups were then compared to the histological findings. Results A total of 74 patients were included, 44 male and 30 female. The age range was from 18 to 83, with a median age of 36. Of 10 patients in the low risk group, 4 (40%) had appendicitis on histology. 36 out of 40 (90%) patients in the intermediate risk group had appendicitis and 100% of the 24 patients in the high risk group. Pearson’s coefficient showed a significant correlation between the AAS risk (low, intermediate, and high) and the histological diagnosis of appendicitis (r = 0.48, p = 0.000016). Conclusions Our study did show a positive correlation between the AAS risk stratification and histological diagnosis. Based on our findings we would recommend the adoption of this score in assessing patients with suspected acute appendicitis and minimising the negative appendicectomy rate.

Suspected appendicitis in pregnancy

The Surgeon ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M. Flexer ◽  
N. Tabib ◽  
M.B. Peter
Keyword(s):  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
In Pregnancy

scholarly journals Efficacy of Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Suspected Appendicitis in a Pediatric Population

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 213-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sornsupha Limchareon ◽  
Alisara Wongsuttilert ◽  
Adisorn Boonyarit
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Population ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis

Value of Fibrinogen to Discriminate Appendicitis from Nonspecific Abdominal Pain in Preschool Children

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (04) ◽  
pp. 357-363
Author(s):  
Javier Gómez-Veiras ◽  
Ángel Salgado-Barreira ◽  
José Luis Vázquez ◽  
Margarita Montero-Sánchez ◽  
José Ramón Fernández-Lorenzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Preschool Children ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
Uncomplicated Appendicitis ◽  
Good Diagnostic Accuracy

Introduction The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of the biomarker fibrinogen (FB), along with the markers white blood cell (WBC) count, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and C-reactive protein (CRP), to discriminate appendicitis from nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) in preschool children. Materials and Methods We prospectively evaluated all children aged <5 years admitted for suspected appendicitis at an academic pediatric emergency department during 5 years. Diagnostic accuracy of FB (prothrombin time–derived method), WBC, ANC, and CRP were assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Results A total of 82 patients were enrolled in the study (27 NSAP, 17 uncomplicated, and 38 complicated appendicitides). WBC and ANC had moderate diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis versus NSAP (WBC: AUC 0.66, ANC: AUC 0.67). CRP and FB had good diagnostic accuracy for appendicitis versus NSAP (CRP: AUC 0.78, FB: AUC 0.77). WBC and ANC are not useful to discriminate complicated versus uncomplicated appendicitis (WBC: AUC 0.43, ANC: AUC 0.45). CPR and FB had good diagnostic accuracy for complicated versus uncomplicated appendicitis (CRP: AUC 0.80, FB: AUC 0.73). Conclusion CRP and FB are more useful than WBC and ANC to discriminate appendicitis from NSAP in preschool children. CRP and FB are especially useful to discriminate complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis and NSAP. In a child with suspected appendicitis, a plasma FB level (prothrombin time–derived method) >540 mg/dL is associated with an increased likelihood of complicated appendicitis.

scholarly journals Evaluation of diagnostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in younger and older pediatrics suspect to acute appendicitis in Imam Hossein hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e26-e26
Author(s):  
Azar Baradaran ◽  
Azar Naimi ◽  
Elahe Pirpiran ◽  
Masoud Akhlaghi
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
The United States ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Suspected Appendicitis ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

Introduction: Acute appendicitis in children is the most common acute surgical condition in children. Each year, 80000 children in the United States suffer from appendicitis. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in younger and older pediatrics suspect of acute appendicitis in Imam Hossein hospital. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at Imam Hossein hospital from 2015-2017. The study population was all children with suspected appendicitis who refer to Imam Hossein medical center in Isfahan. The sample size was 423 people. The collected data were imported into SPSS software version 22 and analyzed with appropriate statistical tests. The significance level in the present study was less than 0.05. Results: The average age of participants was 7.2 ± 3.8 years. In both study groups, it was observed that the mean NLR in the normal and reactive follicular groups was significantly lower than the appendicitis and complication groups (P<0.05). The results of the present study showed that NLR diagnostic test can be a good predictor for the evaluation of appendicitis in both groups under 4 years and over 4 years. For more than 4 years’ group; AUC=0.74, P<0.001 and for less than 4 years’ group; AUC=0.69, P<0.001. For less than 4 years’ group, the cut-off score for appendicitis diagnosis was 2.3. In this cut-off, the sensitivity and specificity were equal to 0.65% and 0.72%. Additionally, for more than 4 years’ group, the cut-off for the diagnosis of appendix was 3.5. In this cut-off, the sensitivity and specificity were equal to 0.73% and 67%. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates that NLR, in the context of appropriate clinical assessment of patients with a high a priori probability of appendicitis, has a greater diagnostic accuracy in supporting the diagnosis of appendicitis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document