scholarly journals Conservation Physiology of Tigers in Zoos: Integrating Stress Physiology and Behaviour to Monitor Their Health and Welfare

Big Cats ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Narayan ◽  
Nagarajan Baskaran ◽  
Janice Vaz
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine L Madliger ◽  
Oliver P Love ◽  
Vivian M Nguyen ◽  
Neal R Haddaway ◽  
Steven J Cooke

Abstract Conservation physiology represents a recently emerging arm of conservation science that applies physiological tools and techniques to understand and solve conservation issues. While a multi-disciplinary toolbox can only help to address the global biodiversity crisis, any field can face challenges while becoming established, particularly highly applied disciplines that require multi-stakeholder involvement. Gaining first-hand knowledge of the challenges that conservation physiologists are facing can help characterize the current state of the field and build a better foundation for determining how it can grow. Through an online survey of 468 scientists working at the intersection of physiology and conservation, we aimed to identify characteristics of those engaging in conservation physiology research (e.g. demographics, primary taxa of study), gauge conservation physiology’s role in contributing to on-the-ground conservation action, identify the perceived barriers to achieving success and determine how difficult any identified barriers are to overcome. Despite all participants having experience combining physiology and conservation, only one-third considered themselves to be ‘conservation physiologists’. Moreover, there was a general perception that conservation physiology does not yet regularly lead to tangible conservation success. Respondents identified the recent conceptualization of the field and the broader issue of adequately translating science into management action as the primary reasons for these deficits. Other significant barriers that respondents have faced when integrating physiology and conservation science included a lack of funding, logistical constraints (e.g. sample sizes, obtaining permits) and a lack of physiological baseline data (i.e. reference ranges of a physiological metric’s ‘normal’ or pre-environmental change levels). We identified 12 actions based on suggestions of survey participants that we anticipate will help deconstruct the barriers and continue to develop a narrative of physiology that is relevant to conservation science, policy and practice.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tariq Aftab ◽  
Rehman Hakeem

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tariq Aftab ◽  
Khalid Rehman Hakeem

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 997-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Merwin ◽  
Katherine A. Leppert ◽  
Victoria C. Smith ◽  
Lea R. Dougherty

1982 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry T. Hubick ◽  
David R. Drakeford ◽  
David M. Reid

Two watering systems used for growing minimally stressed plants are described. An aeroponics system, which relies on a mist of nutrient solution applied to roots without a root support medium, affords control over water availability and easy access to roots. A continuous circulation system, which constantly circulates nutrient medium, also provides control over water availability as well as control over pO2 and stress duration in flooded plants. A comparison is made of the growth characteristics of plants grown in the two systems with those grown by traditional watering methods. The significance of watering prehistory to stress physiology experiments is discussed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 302 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hing ◽  
E. J. Narayan ◽  
R. C. A. Thompson ◽  
S. S. Godfrey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document