scholarly journals Stable Gastric PentadecapeptideBPC 157, Somatosensory Neurons and Their Protection and Therapeutic Extensions — A Survey

Author(s):  
Predrag Sikiric
Neuroscience ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Matsuo ◽  
H Ichikawa ◽  
T.A Henderson ◽  
I Silos-Santiago ◽  
M Barbacid ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (47) ◽  
pp. 12051-12056 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akil A. Puckerin ◽  
Donald D. Chang ◽  
Zunaira Shuja ◽  
Papiya Choudhury ◽  
Joachim Scholz ◽  
...  

Genetically encoded inhibitors for voltage-dependent Ca2+ (CaV) channels (GECCIs) are useful research tools and potential therapeutics. Rad/Rem/Rem2/Gem (RGK) proteins are Ras-like G proteins that potently inhibit high voltage-activated (HVA) Ca2+ (CaV1/CaV2 family) channels, but their nonselectivity limits their potential applications. We hypothesized that nonselectivity of RGK inhibition derives from their binding to auxiliary CaVβ-subunits. To investigate latent CaVβ-independent components of inhibition, we coexpressed each RGK individually with CaV1 (CaV1.2/CaV1.3) or CaV2 (CaV2.1/CaV2.2) channels reconstituted in HEK293 cells with either wild-type (WT) β2a or a mutant version (β2a,TM) that does not bind RGKs. All four RGKs strongly inhibited CaV1/CaV2 channels reconstituted with WT β2a. By contrast, when channels were reconstituted with β2a,TM, Rem inhibited only CaV1.2, Rad selectively inhibited CaV1.2 and CaV2.2, while Gem and Rem2 were ineffective. We generated mutant RGKs (Rem[R200A/L227A] and Rad[R208A/L235A]) unable to bind WT CaVβ, as confirmed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Rem[R200A/L227A] selectively blocked reconstituted CaV1.2 while Rad[R208A/L235A] inhibited CaV1.2/CaV2.2 but not CaV1.3/CaV2.1. Rem[R200A/L227A] and Rad[R208A/L235A] both suppressed endogenous CaV1.2 channels in ventricular cardiomyocytes and selectively blocked 25 and 62%, respectively, of HVA currents in somatosensory neurons of the dorsal root ganglion, corresponding to their distinctive selectivity for CaV1.2 and CaV1.2/CaV2.2 channels. Thus, we have exploited latent β-binding–independent Rem and Rad inhibition of specific CaV1/CaV2 channels to develop selective GECCIs with properties unmatched by current small-molecule CaV channel blockers.


eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kali Esancy ◽  
Logan Condon ◽  
Jing Feng ◽  
Corinna Kimball ◽  
Andrew Curtright ◽  
...  

Little is known about the capacity of lower vertebrates to experience itch. A screen of itch-inducing compounds (pruritogens) in zebrafish larvae yielded a single pruritogen, the TLR7 agonist imiquimod, that elicited a somatosensory neuron response. Imiquimod induced itch-like behaviors in zebrafish distinct from those induced by the noxious TRPA1 agonist, allyl isothiocyanate. In the zebrafish, imiquimod-evoked somatosensory neuronal responses and behaviors were entirely dependent upon TRPA1, while in the mouse TRPA1 was required for the direct activation of somatosensory neurons and partially responsible for behaviors elicited by this pruritogen. Imiquimod was found to be a direct but weak TRPA1 agonist that activated a subset of TRPA1 expressing neurons. Imiquimod-responsive TRPA1 expressing neurons were significantly more sensitive to noxious stimuli than other TRPA1 expressing neurons. Together, these results suggest a model for selective itch via activation of a specialized subpopulation of somatosensory neurons with a heightened sensitivity to noxious stimuli.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Katta ◽  
A. Sanzeni ◽  
A. Das ◽  
M. Vergassola ◽  
M.B. Goodman

AbstractTouch deforms, or strains, the skin beyond the immediate point of contact. The spatiotemporal nature of the touch-induced strain fields depend on the mechanical properties of the skin and the tissues below. Somatosensory neurons that sense touch branch out within the skin and rely on a set of mechano-electrical transduction channels distributed within their dendrites to detect mechanical stimuli. Here, we sought to understand how tissue mechanics shape touch-induced mechanical strain across the skin over time and how individual channels located in different regions of the strain field contribute to the overall touch response. We leveraged C. elegans’ touch receptor neurons (TRNs) as a simple model amenable to in vivo whole-cell patch clamp recording and an integrated experimental-computational approach to dissect the mechanisms underlying the spatial and temporal dynamics that we observed. Consistent with the idea that strain is produced at a distance, we show that delivering strong stimuli outside the anatomical extent of the neuron is sufficient to evoke MRCs. The amplitude and kinetics of the MRCs depended on both stimulus displacement and speed. Finally, we found that the main factor responsible for touch sensitivity is the recruitment of progressively more distant channels by stronger stimuli, rather than modulation of channel open probability. This principle may generalize to somatosensory neurons with more complex morphologies.SummaryThrough experiment and simulation, Katta et al. reveal that pushing faster and deeper recruits more and more distant mechano-electrical transduction channels during touch. The net result is a dynamic receptive field whose size and shape depends on tissue mechanics, stimulus parameters, and channel distribution within sensory neurons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document