scholarly journals Soil-Landscape Modelling – Reference Soil Group Probability Prediction in Southern Ecuador

Author(s):  
Mareike Lie ◽  
Bruno Glaser ◽  
Bernd Huwe
Soil Research ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 381 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mcleod ◽  
WC Rijkse ◽  
JR Dymond

A soil-landscape model, comprising 12 land components at a scale of 1 : 5000, has been developed in Neogene close-jointed mudstone in the Gisborne-East Cape region of the North Island, New Zealand. In a validation, soil order was predicted correctly in 81% of observations, soil group in 80%, soil subgroup in 63% and soilform in 60% of observations. A simplified model based on 11 land components for use at a scale of 1 : 50 000 has also been validated. Here soil order was predicted correctly in 71% of observations, soil group in 73% and soil subgroup in 49% of observations. For application with a digital elevation model (1 : 50 000), the number of land components was amalgamated to five. Here the soil order and soil group were predicted correctly in 63% of observations and soil subgroup in 40% of observations during validation. In all trials, the percentage of correct observations increased if a second choice or subdominant soil class was allowed. It took 2 person-weeks to produce a soil map from the 1 :50 000 form of the model over 400 km2 of steep and hilly country by photo interpretation of stereo aerial photographs, compared with 1 day of applying computer algorithms on the digital elevation model (DEM). The soil-landscape model succinctly relates soil class to land component and it enables improved targeting of farm and planning inputs by empowering existing research into soil fertilizer requirements and soil physical properties.


2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Przemysław Charzyński ◽  
Renata Bednarek ◽  
Andrzej Greinert ◽  
Piotr Hulisz ◽  
Łukasz Uzarowicz

Abstract Technosols are relatively young soil group in WRB soil system, and there is still a lot of to do to better understand processes taking place in these soils and to classify them in a proper way. The objectives of this paper were to (1) evaluate Technosol and 'technogenic' qualifiers for other Reference Soil Groups, and (2) propose new solutions which would improve the classification of technogenic soils in WRB. New qualifiers . Edific, Nekric, Misceric, Artefactic, Radioactivic and new specifier . Technic . are proposed to be added to keys to Technosols. Moreover, Salic and Sodic qualifiers should be also available for Technosols. Furthermore, the supplementation of definitions of thionic horizon and sulphidic material with reference to Technosols is also suggested


Erdkunde ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Wagemann ◽  
Boris Thies ◽  
Rütger Rollenbeck ◽  
Thorsten Peters ◽  
Jörg Bendix

Author(s):  
Fei Jin ◽  
Xiaoliang Liu ◽  
Fangfang Xing ◽  
Guoqiang Wen ◽  
Shuangkun Wang ◽  
...  

Background : The day-ahead load forecasting is an essential guideline for power generating, and it is of considerable significance in power dispatch. Objective: Most of the existing load probability prediction methods use historical data to predict a single area, and rarely use the correlation of load time and space to improve the accuracy of load prediction. Methods: This paper presents a method for day-ahead load probability prediction based on space-time correction. Firstly, the kernel density estimation (KDE) is employed to model the prediction error of the long short-term memory (LSTM) model, and the residual distribution is obtained. Then the correlation value is used to modify the time and space dimensions of the test set's partial period prediction values. Results: The experiment selected three years of load data in 10 areas of a city in northern China. The MAPE of the two modified models on their respective test sets can be reduced by an average of 10.2% and 6.1% compared to previous results. The interval coverage of the probability prediction can be increased by an average of 4.2% and 1.8% than before. Conclusion: The test results show that the proposed correction schemes are feasible.


2019 ◽  
Vol 947 (5) ◽  
pp. 54-62
Author(s):  
M.D. Bogdanova ◽  
M.I. Gerasimova ◽  
V.A. Snytko

Professor Maria Glazovskaya (1912–2016) – an outstanding geographer, geochemist and soil scientist, made a prominent contribution to the formation and development of several aspects of thematic mapping both in conceptual and methodological issues. These aspects, namely, soil, landscape- and soil-geochemical, as well as ecological mapping, were derived from the knowledge on soils combined with the concepts of geochemical migrations facilities for certain chemical elements in soils and landscapes. Methodology of compilation of such maps presumes purposeful interpretation of diverse soil and landscape features, their expert evaluation and forecast of response reactions of soils and landscapes to certain technogenic loads. Maria Glazovskaya proposed innovative approaches to thematic mapping enabling her to compile original maps. She introduced the principle of “prognostic information capacity of natural factors”, which means that properties of landscape components contain information appropriate for evaluating the resilience of natural systems. The ideas and methods proposed by Maria Glazovskaya are now implemented in basic and applied thematic mapping.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document