scholarly journals The Evaluation of High-Degree Geopotential Models for Regional Geoid Determination in Turkey

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Yılmaz ◽  
Bayram Turgut ◽  
Mevlüt Güllü ◽  
İbrahim Yılmaz
Keyword(s):  
Geoid Determination ◽  
Geopotential Models ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Regional Geoid Determination

Application of global geopotential models to high-precesion levelling processing

2017 ◽  
Vol 926 (8) ◽  
pp. 2-9
Author(s):  
V.V. Popadyev ◽  
D.A. Kuliev
Keyword(s):  
Field Model ◽  
Direct Evaluation ◽  
Gravity Field Model ◽  
Bouguer Anomalies ◽  
Free Air ◽  
Geopotential Models ◽  
Integral Characteristics ◽  
Indirect Evaluation ◽  
Gravity Map ◽  
High Degree

The article studies the properties of the high-degree gravity field model EGM-2008 in the calculation of integral characteristics at large distances several times greater than the spatial resolution of the model. As an example of an indirect evaluation of a high-degree model, a gravimetric correction was computed into the sum of the measured elevations along the line of the high-precision I class leveling of the Krasnovodsk – Chardzhou line located in Turkmenistan. Using the calculator ICGEM, the Bouguer anomalies were calculated at each point of the line, then the attraction of the Bouguer layer (used heights are from catalog) excluded for the transition to free-air anomalies. In parallel, for a direct evaluation of the model, a regular grid of Bouguer anomalies with a step of 2 angular minutes within line area was also obtained, which were then compared with the anomalies from the gravity map J-40 of scale 1

scholarly journals Comparison of remove-compute-restore and least squares modification of Stokes' formula techniques to quasi-geoid determination over the Auvergne test area

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Yildiz ◽  
R. Forsberg ◽  
J. Ågren ◽  
C. Tscherning ◽  
L. Sjöberg
Keyword(s):  
Least Squares ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Test Area ◽  
Geoid Determination ◽  
Geopotential Model ◽  
Low Degree ◽  
Residual Terrain Modelling ◽  
The Alps ◽  
Stokes Formula ◽  
Regional Geoid Determination

Comparison of remove-compute-restore and least squares modification of Stokes' formula techniques to quasi-geoid determination over the Auvergne test areaThe remove-compute-restore (RCR) technique for regional geoid determination implies that both topography and low-degree global geopotential model signals are removed before computation and restored after Stokes' integration or Least Squares Collocation (LSC) solution. The Least Squares Modification of Stokes' Formula (LSMS) technique not requiring gravity reductions is implemented here with a Residual Terrain Modelling based interpolation of gravity data. The 2-D Spherical Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and the LSC methods applying the RCR technique and the LSMS method are tested over the Auvergne test area. All methods showed a reasonable agreement with GPS-levelling data, in the order of a 3-3.5 cm in the central region having relatively smooth topography, which is consistent with the accuracies of GPS and levelling. When a 1-parameter fit is used, the FFT method using kernel modification performs best with 3.0 cm r.m.s difference with GPS-levelling while the LSMS method gives the best agreement with GPS-levelling with 2.4 cm r.m.s after a 4-parameter fit is used. However, the quasi-geoid models derived using two techniques differed from each other up to 33 cm in the high mountains near the Alps. Comparison of quasi-geoid models with EGM2008 showed that the LSMS method agreed best in term of r.m.s.

scholarly journals Accuracy Evaluation of Geoid Heights in the National Control Points of South Korea Using High-Degree Geopotential Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1466
Author(s):  
Kwang Bae Kim ◽  
Hong Sik Yun ◽  
Ha Jung Choi
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
Gravity Field ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Geopotential Model ◽  
Control Points ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geopotential Models ◽  
High Degree

Precise geoid heights are not as important for understanding Earth’s gravity field, but they are important to geodesy itself, since the vertical datum is defined as geoid in a cm-level accuracy. Several high-degree geopotential models have been derived lately by using satellite tracking data such as those from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE), satellite altimeter data, and terrestrial and airborne gravity data. The Korean national geoid (KNGeoid) models of the National Geographic Information Institute (NGII) were developed using the latest global geopotential models (GGMs), which are combinations of gravity data from satellites and land gravity data. In this study, geoid heights calculated from the latest high-degree GGMs were used to evaluate the accuracy of the three GGMs (European Improved Gravity model of Earth by New techniques (EIGEN)-6C4, Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008), and GOCE-EGM2008 combined model (GECO)) by comparing them with the geoid heights derived from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)/leveling of the 1182 unified control points (UCPs) that have been installed by NGII in South Korea since 2008. In addition, the geoid heights derived from the KNGeoid models were compared with the geoid heights derived from the GNSS/leveling of the 1182 UCPs to assess the accuracy of the KNGeoid models in terms of relative geoid heights for further gravimetric geoid determination studies in South Korea. As a result, the EGM2008 model could be selected as the suitable GGM from among the three GGMs for determining a gravimetric geoid model for South Korea.

EVALUATION OF ULTRA-HIGH DEGREE GEOPOTENTIAL MODELS IN AUSTRALIA

Survey Review ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 36 (285) ◽  
pp. 474-482
Author(s):  
K. Zhang ◽  
R. Deakin ◽  
N. Talbot ◽  
N. Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Geopotential Models ◽  
High Degree

Regional geoid determination in Antarctica utilizing airborne gravity and topography data

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (7) ◽  
pp. 403-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirko Scheinert ◽  
Jan Müller ◽  
Reinhard Dietrich ◽  
Detlef Damaske ◽  
Volkmar Damm
Keyword(s):  
Geoid Determination ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Regional Geoid Determination ◽  
Topography Data
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document