scholarly journals Accuracy Evaluation of Geoid Heights in the National Control Points of South Korea Using High-Degree Geopotential Model

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 1466
Author(s):  
Kwang Bae Kim ◽  
Hong Sik Yun ◽  
Ha Jung Choi
Keyword(s):  
South Korea ◽  
Gravity Field ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Geopotential Model ◽  
Control Points ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geopotential Models ◽  
High Degree

Precise geoid heights are not as important for understanding Earth’s gravity field, but they are important to geodesy itself, since the vertical datum is defined as geoid in a cm-level accuracy. Several high-degree geopotential models have been derived lately by using satellite tracking data such as those from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE), satellite altimeter data, and terrestrial and airborne gravity data. The Korean national geoid (KNGeoid) models of the National Geographic Information Institute (NGII) were developed using the latest global geopotential models (GGMs), which are combinations of gravity data from satellites and land gravity data. In this study, geoid heights calculated from the latest high-degree GGMs were used to evaluate the accuracy of the three GGMs (European Improved Gravity model of Earth by New techniques (EIGEN)-6C4, Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008), and GOCE-EGM2008 combined model (GECO)) by comparing them with the geoid heights derived from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)/leveling of the 1182 unified control points (UCPs) that have been installed by NGII in South Korea since 2008. In addition, the geoid heights derived from the KNGeoid models were compared with the geoid heights derived from the GNSS/leveling of the 1182 UCPs to assess the accuracy of the KNGeoid models in terms of relative geoid heights for further gravimetric geoid determination studies in South Korea. As a result, the EGM2008 model could be selected as the suitable GGM from among the three GGMs for determining a gravimetric geoid model for South Korea.

scholarly journals Assessment of high-degree reference models and Recent Goce/Grace Global Geopotential Models over Sudan based on the GPS/Leveling data

2021 ◽  
Vol 936 (1) ◽  
pp. 012035
Author(s):  
Anas Sharafeldin Mohamed Osman ◽  
Ira Mutiara Anjasmara ◽  
Abdelrahim Ruby ◽  
Zahroh Arsy Udama
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Accuracy Evaluation ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Gravity Field Model ◽  
Reference Models ◽  
Geopotential Models ◽  
Gps Leveling ◽  
High Degree

Abstract Nowadays, Global Geopotential Models (GGMs) can be used as a reference to develop more detailed regional/local geoids, or they can be used to provide geoid heights on their own. Since 2000, several GGMs have been released, and they are mainly derived from satellite gravity measurements, satellite-only models, terrestrial gravimetry, altimeter-derived gravity data in marine areas, and airborne gravity data. With a precise geoid model, ellipsoidal heights obtained from GPS can be converted to orthometric heights, which is reasonably quite needed in Geodesy, Civil Engineering, etc. These heights reflect changes in topography as well as local variations in gravity. This paper evaluates some of the latest releases of high degree reference models and the satellite-only global gravity field model over Sudan using 19 GPS/Leveling stations. We have been selected 6 GGMs based on Gravity field Goce and Grace, and they released in 2020, 2019, 2014, 2008, and 1996 as shown in the International Centre for Global Earth Models website (ICGEM). The accuracy evaluation of the GGM models have been discussed, the accurate GGMs over Sudan are XGM2019e_2159 and GOCO05s, which have indicated -0.019 and 0.046 meters, respectively. The evaluation results produce valuable information to academia and geoid modeling research topics in Sudan, which shows the precise model from the selected GGMs in Sudan by using the available GPS/Leveling data.

scholarly journals GRAVIMETRIC GEOID MODELLING OVER PENINSULAR MALAYSIA USING TWO DIFFERENT GRIDDING APPROACHES FOR COMBINING FREE AIR ANOMALY

2019 ◽  
Vol XLII-4/W16 ◽  
pp. 515-522
Author(s):  
M. F. Pa’suya ◽  
A. H. M. Din ◽  
J. C. McCubbine ◽  
A. H. Omar ◽  
Z. M. Amin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Data ◽  
Reference Signal ◽  
Digital Terrain Model ◽  
Peninsular Malaysia ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Geopotential Model ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Free Air ◽  
Free Air Anomaly

Abstract. We investigate the use of the KTH Method to compute gravimetric geoid models of Malaysian Peninsular and the effect of two differing strategies to combine and interpolate terrestrial, marine DTU17 free air gravity anomaly data at regular grid nodes. Gravimetric geoid models were produced for both free air anomaly grids using the GOCE-only geopotential model GGM GO_CONS_GCF_2_SPW_R4 as the long wavelength reference signal and high-resolution TanDEM-X global digital terrain model. The geoid models were analyzed to assess how the different gridding strategies impact the gravimetric geoid over Malaysian Peninsular by comparing themto 172 GNSS-levelling derived geoid undulations. The RMSE of the two sets of gravimetric geoid model / GNSS-levelling residuals differed by approx. 26.2 mm. When a 4-parameter fit is used, the difference between the RMSE of the residuals reduced to 8 mm. The geoid models shown here do not include the latest airborne gravity data used in the computation of the official gravimetric geoid for the Malaysian Peninsular, for this reason they are not as precise.

scholarly journals An Assessment of Recently Released High-Degree Global Geopotential Models Based on Heterogeneous Geodetic and Ocean Data

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yihao Wu ◽  
Xiufeng He ◽  
Zhicai Luo ◽  
Hongkai Shi
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Data ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Geopotential Model ◽  
Model Assessment ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Ocean Reanalysis ◽  
Ocean Science ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Ocean Reanalysis Data

The development of the global geopotential model (GGM) broadens its applications in ocean science, which emphasizes the importance for model assessment. We assess the recently released high-degree GGMs over the South China Sea through heterogeneous geodetic observations and synthetic/ocean reanalysis data. The comparisons with a high resolution (∼3 km) airborne gravimetric survey over the Paracel Islands show that XGM2019e_2159 has relatively high quality, where the standard deviation (SD) of the misfits against the airborne gravity data is ∼3.1 mGal. However, the comparisons with local airborne/shipborne gravity data hardly discriminate the qualities of other GGMs that have or truncated to the same expansion degree. Whereas, the comparisons with the synthetic/ocean reanalysis data demonstrate that the qualities of the values derived from different GGMs are not identical, and the ones derived from XGM2019e_2159 have better performances. The SD of the misfits between the mean dynamic topography (MDT) derived from XGM2019e_2159 and the ocean data is 2.5 cm; and this value changes to 7.1 cm/s (6.8 cm/s) when the associated zonal (meridian) geostrophic velocities are assessed. In contrast, the values derived from the other GGMs show deteriorated qualities compared to those derived from XGM2019e_2159. In particular, the contents computed from the widely used EGM2008 have relatively poor qualities, which is reduced by 3.9 cm when the MDT is assessed, and by 4.0 cm/s (5.5 cm/s) when the zonal (meridian) velocities are assessed, compared to the results derived from XGM2019e_2159. The results suggest that the choice of a GGM in oceanographic study is crucial, especially over coastal zones. Moreover, the synthetic/ocean data sets may be served as additional data sources for global/regional gravity field assessment, which are useful in regions that lack of high-quality geodetic data.

scholarly journals The Uganda Gravimetric Geoid Model 2014 Computed by The KTH Method

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. Sjöberg ◽  
A. Gidudu ◽  
R. Ssengendo
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Geoid Determination ◽  
Geopotential Model ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Satellite Mission ◽  
Terrestrial Gravity ◽  
Gravity Field Recovery ◽  
Goce Satellite

AbstractFor many developing countries such as Uganda, precise gravimetric geoid determination is hindered by the low quantity and quality of the terrestrial gravity data. With only one gravity data point per 65 km2, gravimetric geoid determination in Uganda appears an impossible task. However, recent advances in geoid modelling techniques coupled with the gravity-field anomalies from the Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) satellite mission have opened new avenues for geoid determination especially for areas with sparse terrestrial gravity. The present study therefore investigates the computation of a gravimetric geoid model overUganda (UGG2014) using the Least Squares Modification of Stokes formula with additive corrections. UGG2014 was derived from sparse terrestrial gravity data from the International Gravimetric Bureau, the 3 arc second SRTM ver4.1 Digital Elevation Model from CGIAR-CSI and the GOCE-only global geopotential model GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIM_R5. To compensate for the missing gravity data in the target area, we used the surface gravity anomalies extracted from the World Gravity Map 2012. Using 10 Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)/levelling data points distributed over Uganda, the RMS fit of the gravimetric geoid model before and after a 4-parameter fit is 11 cm and 7 cm respectively. These results show that UGG2014 agrees considerably better with GNSS/levelling than any other recent regional/ global gravimetric geoid model. The results also emphasize the significant contribution of the GOCE satellite mission to the gravity field recovery, especially for areas with very limited terrestrial gravity data.With an RMS of 7 cm, UGG2014 is a significant step forward in the modelling of a “1-cm geoid” over Uganda despite the poor quality and quantity of the terrestrial gravity data used for its computation.

scholarly journals Role of geo-potential models in gravity field determination

2009 ◽  
pp. 34-37
Author(s):  
Niraj Manandhar ◽  
Rene Forsberg
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Geopotential Model ◽  
Potential Models ◽  
Geopotential Models ◽  
Gravity Field Determination ◽  
Major Emphasis

This paper sets out to describe the developments of geopotential models and its role in gravity field determination. The paper also focuses in different geopotential models those are available and in use from 1980 onwards till at present with major emphasis placed on WGS84 EGM96 geopotential model.

Gravity constraints on the interior structure of Europa

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isamu Matsuyama ◽  
Antony Trinh
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Field ◽  
Shell Thickness ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Equal Mass ◽  
Altimeter Data ◽  
Structure Parameters ◽  
Interior Structure ◽  
Subsurface Ocean ◽  
Love Numbers ◽  
Ice Shell

<p><span>We assess the gravity constraints on the interior structure of Europa in anticipation of the Europa Clipper mission.</span></p><p><span>Moore and Schubert (2000) illustrated that the diurnal tide amplitude, quantified by the diurnal (tidal) Love numbers, k<sub>2</sub><sup>d</sup> and h<sub>2</sub><sup>d</sup>, can be used to determine the presence of a subsurface liquid ocean due to the significant increase in tidal amplitudes associated with the mechanical decoupling of the shell with a subsurface ocean.<span>  </span>However, they considered a limited range of possible interior parameters except the ice shell rigidity, which was assumed to be in the range of 1-10 GPa. We consider a wider range of possible interior structure parameters and a more realistic ice shell rigidity range of 1-4 GPa. Inferring the presence of a subsurface ocean is slightly easier than previously thought (Verma & Margot 2018), with required absolute precisions of 0.08 for k<sub>2</sub><sup>d</sup> , and 0.44 for h<sub>2</sub><sup>d</sup> .</span></p><p><span>Previous work have considered diurnal (tidal) gravity constraints alone or static gravity constraints alone using a forward modeling approach (e.g.<span>  </span>Anderson et al., 1998; Moore and Schubert, 2000; Wahr et al., 2006). We evaluate constraints on interior structure parameters using Bayesian inversion with the mass, static gravity, and diurnal gravity as constraints, allowing a probabilistic view of Europa's interior structure. Given the same relative uncertainties, the static Love numbers provide stronger constraints on the interior structure relative to those from the mean moment of inertia (MOI). Additionally, the static Love numbers can be inferred directly from the static gravity field whereas inferring the MOI requires the Radau-Darwin approximation.</span></p><p><span>Jointly considered with the static shape, the static gravity field can constrain the average and long-wavelength thickness of the shell. For an isostatically compensated shell, it is usual to conceptualize the crust as a series of independently floating columns of equal cross-sectional area which, by application of Archimedes' principle, should have equal mass above the depth of compensation. However, this approach is unphysical in the presence of curvature and self-gravitation. We consider alternative prescriptions of Airy isostasy: the equal-pressure prescription (Hemingway and Matsuyama, 2017), and the minimum-stress prescription (Dahlen 1982; Beuthe et al., 2016; Trinh et al., 2019).<span>  </span>The gravitational coefficients are more sensitive to shell thickness than would be expected from the classical (equal-mass) approach, illustrating that the equal-mass prescription can lead to large errors in the inferred average shell thickness and its lateral variations.</span></p><p><span>Diurnal gravity data alone can only constrain the product of the shell rigidity and thickness (Moore and Schubert, 2000; Wahr et al., 2006). An additional observational constraint that is sensitive to these parameters is the libration amplitude, which can be obtained from direct imaging or from altimeter data. We show that a joint gravity and libration analysis is able to separately constrain the shell thickness and rigidity.</span></p>

scholarly journals THE EVALUATION OF THE NEW ZEALAND'S GEOID MODEL USING THE KTH METHOD / NAUJOSIOS ZELANDIJOS GEOIDO MODELIO VERTINIMAS KTH METODU / ОЦЕНКА МОДЕЛИ ГЕОИДА НОВОЙ ЗЕЛАНДИИ С ПРИМЕНЕНИЕМ МЕТОДА КТН

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdalla ◽  
Robert Tenzer
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Spherical Approximation ◽  
Geopotential Model ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Marine Gravity ◽  
Gravity Database ◽  
Stokes Integral

We compile a new geoid model at the computation area of New Zealand and its continental shelf using the method developed at the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in Stockholm. This method utilizes the least-squares modification of the Stokes integral for the biased, unbiased, and optimum stochastic solutions. The modified Bruns-Stokes integral combines the regional terrestrial gravity data with a global geopotential model (GGM). Four additive corrections are calculated and applied to the approximate geoid heights in order to obtain the gravimetric geoid. These four additive corrections account for the combined direct and indirect effects of topography and atmosphere, the contribution of the downward continuation reduction, and the formulation of the Stokes problem in the spherical approximation. The gravimetric geoid model is computed using two heterogonous gravity data sets: the altimetry-derived gravity anomalies from the DNSC08 marine gravity database (offshore) and the ground gravity measurements from the GNS Science gravity database (onshore). The GGM coefficients are taken from EIGEN-GRACE02S complete to degree 65 of spherical harmonics. The topographic heights are generated from the 1×1 arc-sec detailed digital terrain model (DTM) of New Zealand and from the 30×30 arc-sec global elevation data of SRTM30_PLUS V5.0. The least-squares analysis is applied to combine the gravity and GPS-levelling data using a 7-parameter model. The fit of the KTH geoid model with GPS-levelling data in New Zealand is 7 cm in terms of the standard deviation (STD) of differences. This STD fit is the same as the STD fit of the NZGeoid2009, which is the currently adopted official quasigeoid model for New Zealand. Santrauka Stokholmo Karališkajame technologijos institute (KTH) sukurtu metodu apskaičiuotas naujas Naujosios Zelandijos ir kontinentinio šelfo geoido modelis. Taikoma Stokso integralo mažiausiųjų kvadratų modifikacija, įvertinant paklaidas ir jų nevertinant bei ieškant optimalių stochastinių sprendinių. Modifikuotas Bruno ir Stokso integralas sieja regioninius žemyninius gravimetrinius duomenis su globaliuoju geopotencialo modeliu (GGM). Gravimetriniam geoidui gauti skaičiuojamos keturios papildomos pataisos: topografinės situacijos ir atmosferos tiesioginės ir netiesioginės įtakos, redukcijos įtakos ir Stokso integralo taikymo sferiniam paviršiui. Gravimetrinis geoido modelis apskaičiuotas pagal du duomenų rinkinius: DNSC08 jūrinių gravimetrinių duomenų bazėje (šelfas) esančias altimetriniu metodu nustatytas sunkio pagreičio anomalijas ir žemyninės dalies gravimetrinių matavimų duomenis iš GNS gravimetrinės duomenų bazės (pakrantė). GGM koeficientai imti iš EIGEN-GRACE02S modelio sferinių iki 65 laipsnio harmonikų. Topografiniai aukščiai sugeneruoti iš Naujosios Zelandijos 1×1 sekundės detaliojo skaitmeninio reljefo modelio ir iš 30×30 sekundžių globaliojo aukščių modelio SRTM30_PLUS V5.0. Gravimetriniams ir GPS niveliacijos duomenims sujungti taikytas mažiausiųjų kvadratų 7 parametrų metodas. KTH metodu sudaryto geoido modelio vidutinė kvadratinė paklaida 7 cm. Tai sutampa su NZGeoid 2009 geoido modelio, taikomo Naujoje Zelandijoje, tikslumu. Резюме Модель геоида континентального шельфа Новой Зеландии построена с применением метода, созданного в Королевском технологическом институте Стокгольма. Данный метод основан на модификации решения интеграла Стокса методом наименьших квадратов с оценкой или без оценки погрешностей и поиском оптимальных статистических решений. Модифицированный интеграл БрунаСтокса объединяет региональные надземные гравиметрические данные с глобальной геопотенциальной моделью (GGM). Для определения гравиметрического геоида вычисляются дополнительные поправки прямого и косвенного влияния топографии и атмосферы, редукции и применения проблемы Стокса для сферической поверхности. Гравиметрическая модель геоида вычисляется на основе двух баз данных: альтиметрическим методом определенных аномалий силы тяжести в базе морских гравиметрических данных DNSC08 (шельф) и надземной части гравиметрических измерений из базы данных GNS. Коэффициенты GGM взяты из сферических гармоник до 65 степени модели EIGENGRACEO2S. Топографические высоты сгенерированы из детальной цифровой модели рельефа Новой Зеландии с сеткой 1×1 секунду и из глобальной модели высот SRTM30_PLUSv5.0 с сеткой 30×30 секунд. Для объединения гравиметрических и GPSнивелирных данных применялся метод наименьших квадратов с 7 параметрами. Среднеквадратическая погрешность модели геоида, созданной по методу КТН, равна 7 см. Точность аналогична точности применяемой в Новой Зеландии модели геоида NZGeoid2009.

scholarly journals GRAVITY ANOMALY ASSESSMENT USING GGMS AND AIRBORNE GRAVITY DATA TOWARDS BATHYMETRY ESTIMATION

2016 ◽  
Vol XLII-4/W1 ◽  
pp. 287-297
Author(s):  
A. Tugi ◽  
A. H. M. Din ◽  
K. M. Omar ◽  
A. S. Mardi ◽  
Z. A. M. Som ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Anomaly ◽  
Gravity Field ◽  
Ocean Circulation ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Gravity Anomalies ◽  
Airborne Gravity ◽  
Satellite Gravity ◽  
Earth’S Gravity Field ◽  
Explorer Mission ◽  
Satellite Gravity Missions

The Earth’s potential information is important for exploration of the Earth’s gravity field. The techniques of measuring the Earth’s gravity using the terrestrial and ship borne technique are time consuming and have limitation on the vast area. With the space-based measuring technique, these limitations can be overcome. The satellite gravity missions such as Challenging Mini-satellite Payload (CHAMP), Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), and Gravity-Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer Mission (GOCE) has introduced a better way in providing the information on the Earth’s gravity field. From these satellite gravity missions, the Global Geopotential Models (GGMs) has been produced from the spherical harmonics coefficient data type. The information of the gravity anomaly can be used to predict the bathymetry because the gravity anomaly and bathymetry have relationships between each other. There are many GGMs that have been published and each of the models gives a different value of the Earth’s gravity field information. Therefore, this study is conducted to assess the most reliable GGM for the Malaysian Seas. This study covered the area of the marine area on the South China Sea at Sabah extent. Seven GGMs have been selected from the three satellite gravity missions. The gravity anomalies derived from the GGMs are compared with the airborne gravity anomaly, in order to figure out the correlation (R<sup>2</sup>) and the root mean square error (RMSE) of the data. From these assessments, the most suitable GGMs for the study area is GOCE model, GO_CONS_GCF_2_TIMR4 with the R<sup>2</sup> and RMSE value of 0.7899 and 9.886 mGal, respectively. This selected model will be used in the estimating the bathymetry for Malaysian Seas in future.

Accuracy Assessment of Recent High-Degree Global Geopotential Models Using Geodetic Control Points and Terrestrial Gravity Data in Turkey

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammed Raşit Çevikalp ◽  
Bihter Erol ◽  
Bilal Mutlu ◽  
Serdar Erol
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Data ◽  
Geopotential Model ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Terrestrial Gravity ◽  
Practical Applications ◽  
Geopotential Models ◽  
Vertical Datum ◽  
Height System ◽  
Orthometric Heights ◽  
Height System Unification

&lt;p&gt;The maintenance of leveling benchmark is both laborious and costly due to distortions caused by geodynamic activities and local deformations. It is necessary to realize geoid-based vertical datum, which also enables calculation from ellipsoidal heights obtained from GNSS to orthometric heights that have physical meaning. It can be considered as an important step for height system unification as it eliminates the problems stem from the conventional vertical datum. The ongoing height modernization efforts in Turkey focus to improve quality and coverage of the gravity data, eliminate errors in existing terrestrial gravity measurements in order to achieve a precise geoid model. Accuracy of the geopotential model is crucial while realizing a geoid model based vertical datum as well as unifying the regional height systems with the International Heights Reference System. In this point of view, we assessed the accuracies of recently released global geopotential models including XGM2019e_2159, GECO, EIGEN-6C4, EGM2008, SGG-UGM-1, EIGEN-6C3stat, and EIGEN-6C2 using high order GNSS/leveling control benchmarks and terrestrial gravity data in Turkey. The reason for choosing these models in the validations is their relatively higher spatial resolutions and improved accuracies compared to other GGMs in published validation results with globally distributed terrestrial data. The GNSS/leveling data used in validations include high accuracy GNSS coordinates in ITRF datum with co-located Helmert orthometric heights in regional vertical datum. 100 benchmarks are homogeneously distributed in the country with the benchmarks along the coastlines. In addition, the terrestrial gravity anomalies with 5 arc-minute resolution were also used in the tests. In order to have comparable results, residual terrain effect has been restored to the GGM derived parameters. Numerical tests revealed significant differences in accuracies of the tested GGMs. The most accurate GGM has the comparable performance with official regional geoid model solutions in Turkey. The drawn results in the study were interpreted and discussed from practical applications and height system unification points in conclusion.&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Implementation of a rigorous least-squares modification of Stokes’ formula to compute a gravimetric geoid model over Saudi Arabia (SAGEO13)

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 823-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdalla ◽  
Saad Mogren
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Gravity Data ◽  
Computational Method ◽  
Gravimetric Geoid ◽  
Geoid Model ◽  
Geopotential Models ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Stokes Formula ◽  
Elevation Model

A gravimetric geoid model (SAGEO13) is computed for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia using a rigorous stochastic computational method. The computational methodology is based on a combination of least-squares (LS) modification of Stokes’ formula and the additive corrections for topographic, ellipsoidal, atmospheric, and downward continuation effects on the geoid solution. In this study, we used terrestrial gravity data, a digital elevation model (SRTM3), and seven global geopotential models (GGMs) to compute a new geoid model for Saudi Arabia. The least-squares coefficients are derived based on the optimisation of the input modification parameters. The gravimetric solution and its additive corrections are computed based on the optimum LS coefficients. Compared to GPS-levelling data, SAGEO13 shows a fit of 18 cm (RMS) after using a 4-parameter fitting model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document