Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Woric of the Bulgarian Pension Market

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yordanka Hristova ◽  
◽  
◽  

The article examines the growing threat of the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the Bulgarian pension market. The applied investment regulatory approaches are considered an objective necessity and a prerequisite for making investment decisions in the context of a pandemic situation. The main trends of the return, realized by the pension funds for the previous and the current year, and its ratio to the alternative losses are indicated through an analysis of statistical data in the context of the first pensions granted to the insured persons of the universal pension funds.

2019 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl-Christian Trönnberg ◽  
Sven Hemlin

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding of pension fund managers investment thinking when confronted with challenging investment decisions. The study focuses on the theoretical question of how dual thinking processes in experts’ investment decision-making emerge. This question has attracted interest in economic psychology but has not yet been answered. Here, it is explored in the context of pension funds.Design/methodology/approachThe sample included 22 pension fund managers. The authors explored their decision-making by applying the critical incident interview technique, which entailed collecting investment decisions that fund managers retrieved from recent memory (Flanagan, 1954). Questions concerned the investment situation, the decision-making process and the challenges and uncertainties the fund managers faced.FindingsMany of the 61 critical incidents examined concerned challenging (mostly stock) investments based on extensive analysis (e.g. reliance on external analysts for advice; analysis of massive amounts of hard company and stock market information; scrutiny of company reports and personal meetings with CEOs). However, fund managers to a high degree based their decisions on soft information judgments such as experience and qualitative judgements of teams. The authors found heuristics, intuitive thinking, biases (sunk cost effects) and social influences in investment decision-making.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample is small and not randomly selected.Practical implicationsThe authors suggest anti-bias training and better acquaintance with human forecasting limitations for pension fund managers.Originality/valuePension fund managers’ investment thinking has not previously been investigated. The authors show the types of investment situations in which analytical and intuitive thinking and biases occur.


2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 2041-2086 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEKSANDAR ANDONOV ◽  
YAEL V. HOCHBERG ◽  
JOSHUA D. RAUH

1998 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 997-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
G L Clark

Pension funds may be one of the few avenues now open for financing new urban infrastructure and development projects. But convention dominates pension fund trustees' investment decisions, so it is difficult to see how the ambitions of advocates of pension fund investment can be squared with trustees' behaviour. The question is: why does convention dominate? Drawing on previously reported interviews and case studies, I propose a framework through which to understand the dominance of convention. In doing so, I identify a set of behavioural traits that structure decisions. This framework is inspired by the contributions of Kahneman and Tversky and their colleagues for understanding the economic psychology of individual decisionmaking. The paper is intended to be a realistic account of the attributes of trustee decisionmaking, recognising the ingrained and systematic nature of the identified habits, rules, and norms. The paper is also inspired by Keynes's work on risk and uncertainty. In combination, I assess the potential for investment innovation by pension fund trustees, noting the importance of analogical reasoning in extending the range of pension funds investments. The paper closes with a comparison of the proposed framework with standard treatments of decisionmaking, including reference to the robustness of psychological models of habit.


Author(s):  
Elena Ivanovna Kulikova

The results of the analysis of statistical data on the Russian labor market, employment and wages, as well as the specific features of the Russian pension system, provide the basis for several important conclusions. Firstly, the living standards of the majority of Russian pensioners do not meet their needs as the Russian pension system is focused on the achievement of minimum living standards. Secondly, the regulation on the functioning of the pension system established by Russian legislation is often violated by the regulators without coordination with economic entities and citizens, participants of the pension system, which prevents future pensioners from feeling protected upon retirement. For this reason, citizens of the retirement age do not seek to retire even when they reach the retirement age. The growth rate of working pensioners (who pay taxes, including insurance deductions to the Pension Fund of Russia and private pension funds) confirms this. Thirdly, there is a need to create a socially-comfortable environment for pensioners, to counteract the psychological problems of older people their sense of “uselessness” to society. The article proposes practical measures to mitigate the negative phenomena in the pension provision of Russian citizens.


Author(s):  
Diane-Laure Arjaliès ◽  
Philip Grant ◽  
Iain Hardie ◽  
Donald MacKenzie ◽  
Ekaterina Svetlova

Chapter 3 examines the mechanisms through which clients impact fund managers’ practices and vice versa. The discussion encompasses fixed income investment as well as investment in shares. In both fixed income and shares, clients can include both institutional investors (such as pension funds) and retail investors (i.e. private individuals, though often guided by financial advisers). Their reasons for investment vary, leading to different time-horizons on their decisions, different ways of measuring performance, and different forms of interaction with the rest of the investment chain. They often rely on various types of advisers: investment consultants, independent financial advisers, and fund-rating companies. Variations of those kinds among the clients influence fund managers’ investment decisions, whether intentionally or not. Thus, the chapter suggests that the client–fund manager relationship is not a simple principal–agent problem, but a multi-faceted, contextually dependent, malleable matter.


Upravlenie ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 32-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Талыкова ◽  
A. Talykova

In this paper the author considers the dynamics and trends of nongovernmental pension funds (NPF) evolution in Russia in recent years. Statistical data on the NPF number, which is steadily declining, have been demonstrated; possible causes of this trend have been identified. The author has presented viewpoints of the financial and social blocks of the RF Government on pension savings preservation and pension reform continuation. The current situation in the corporatization of nongovernmental pension funds and their integration into the pension savings safeguard insurance system has been analyzed in this paper. The data for 2012-2015 on values of the nongovernmental pension funds’ pension savings and pension reserves, number of insured persons and participants involved in the NPF, average total account values on mandatory pension insurance (MPI) and nongovernmental pension provision (NPP), pension payments values, number of pensioners. Comparative data for MPI and NPP market evolution (key figures, rate of increase) have been presented. The presence of private management companies on MPI market has been analyzed; the pension savings values in nongovernmental pension funds, private management companies and Pension fund of the Russian Federation have been compared; reserves for the further development of NPF on the mandatory pension insurance market have been revealed. On the results of performance indicators analysis a list of the largest 13 NPF in terms of pension reserves (these are the funds which each has collected on its accounts more than 1 % of all pension reserves on the market) has been composed. A similar list has been composed in terms of pension savings — a list of the largest 20 NPF, which each has collected on its accounts more than 1 % of all NPF’s pension reserves. The funds indicators from these lists have been compared with the data from all other NPF, regularities differences in NPP and MPI lists have been revealed. Based on identified trends the author makes forecasts on the nongovernmental pension funds development in each presence segment.


Ekonomika ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 54-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teodoras Medaiskis ◽  
Tadas Gudaitis

Abstract. The aim of the study was is to evaluate the impact of a privately accumulated second pillar component on old-age pension. This evaluation is based on quantitative, statistical data and qualitative analysis of pension accumulation results in second pillar during the years 2004–2012. Three groups of different monthly wage size (low, medium, and high) earners are analyzed by calculating the accumulated amounts and old-age pension values of persons who joined and who did not join the second pillar pension funds in 2004 and who retired in the beginning of 2013. The pension reform success (or failure) is evaluated from the point of view of old age pension beneficiaries by comparison of gain or loss of all three groups of participants due to participation in second pillar pension funds. The results show that due to the longer life expectancy the capital accumulated by women in the second pillar does not exceed the present value of loss in the pay-as-you-go system. The comparisonof “official” annuities exposes a more optimistic result for both genders of participants of fully funded private second pillar pension funds, but is not confirmed by commercial annuities.Key words: old-age pension, private second pillar pension funds, pension reform


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-80
Author(s):  
Oscar Valdemar De la Torre Torres ◽  
◽  
Roberto Joaquín Santillán Salgado ◽  
Francisco López Herrera

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document