scholarly journals ETIKA GLOBAL GUNA MENGENDALIKAN KAPITALISME GLOBAL

LOGOS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-88
Author(s):  
Febry Ferdinan Laleno
Keyword(s):  
World Economy ◽  
Global Capitalism ◽  
Global Ethics ◽  
Economic Ethics ◽  
Global Order ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Human Needs ◽  
Free Competition ◽  
The World ◽  
Modern Era

The picture of world economy is increasingly leading to global capitalism thathas been considered as an ideal. Capitalism makes entrepreneurs have the samechance and freedom to optimizing their business in free competition andmarket mechanism. Through this way, they expect that prosperity can be realized. This idealized image becomes gloomy as the world is still colored bythe ongoing economic crisis in this modern era and the facts show that there arestill many people in the world who are living in poverty, unemployment, hunger, and the threat of ecosystem destruction. In this context, ethics is the answer to human needs. Global Ethics according to Hans Küng brings full human values, commitment to life, fair economic order, culture of tolerance, and cooperation among humans. Global Ethics can be a first step for entrepreneurs and policy makers to create a culture of positive economic. The effort to realize a more humane global order should be enforced based on a commitment to a fundamental consensus. This consensus contains the outlines of the new paradima of economic ethics which can manage global capitalism to obtain an economic policy that can serve all mankind for the sustainable future of the world

Critical Analysis of the World Economy and Deglobalization Processes in Times of Pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
José G. Vargas-Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
World Economy ◽  
Financial Integration ◽  
Economic Agents ◽  
Political Actors ◽  
Trade Relations ◽  
Human Needs ◽  
The World ◽  
History Of ◽  
Complex Phenomena

This chapter aims to critically analyze both the world economy and the deglobalization processes under the assumption that they are the result of a dialectical evolution of economic, financial, political, and sanitary crises. This dialectical movement of the history of the globalization and deglobalization processes is always a very complex phenomena of interactions between the economic agents and political actors, leading to both progressive and regressive events of economic growth, social development, and environmental sustainability. After a period of intensive economic, trade, and financial integration in the creation of a world economy system, suddenly the economic, financial, and sanitary dysfunctionalities emerged at the interior and created a reactive deglobalization process. However, what has been at the center are the international cooperation and trade relations determined by the need to expand the possibilities of satisfying human needs, including culture.

scholarly journals Towards a Neo-bipolar Model of the World Order: Scouting Game in Africa

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-29
Author(s):  
L. L. Fituni
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
World Economy ◽  
World Order ◽  
The United States ◽  
New World Order ◽  
Global Order ◽  
The Us ◽  
The World ◽  
The Usa ◽  
General Movement

The article lays out a hypothesis that the global order slides into a new bipolarity in the context of the escalating geo-economic and geopolitical confrontation between the two poles that currently dominate the world - the United States and China. The neo-bipolar construction cannot yet be regarded as an established new world order, but the general movement of the world economy and international relations in this direction is obvious. The neo-bipolar bipolar confrontation manifest itself with varying intensity in different regions of the world. The author argues that at present the peripheral regions which are strategically important for the prospects of competition are becoming an important testing ground for relatively “safe” elaboration of methods and tactics of geo-economic rivalry and h mutual exchange of systemic attacks. Today, Africa has become practically the leading theater of the new bipolar confrontation. The article analyzes the economic, military and strategic aspects of the rivalry between the United States and China on the African continent. It provides a comparative analysis of the new African strategies of the two superpowers adopted at the end of 2018. The author asserts that in the context of the emerging global bipolarity, the strategies of the USA and China represent antagonistic programs based on fundamentally different initial messages. In the case of the US strategy, this is to deter by denial the spread of the competitor’s influence using tough policies, including forceful (while not necessarily military) confrontational actions. While China seeks to neutralize the opposition of the United States and its allies to Beijing’s expansion on the continent and to win the freedom of interaction with any partners in Africa causing minimal direct confrontation possible. Therefore, despite the seemingly “peripheral” importance of the confrontation on the continent, for the establishment of a neo-bipolar world order, the proclamation of the new US regional geopolitical strategy, which focuses on the containment of China in the name of protecting democracy and independence, can serve not only for Africa, but for the whole planet the same milestone signal as Churchill’s Fulton speech for the final advent of bipolarity in the postwar world.

Critical Analysis of the World Economy and Deglobalization Processes in Times of Pandemic

2021 ◽  
pp. 202-223
Author(s):  
José G. Vargas-Hernández
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
World Economy ◽  
Financial Integration ◽  
Economic Agents ◽  
Political Actors ◽  
Trade Relations ◽  
Human Needs ◽  
The World ◽  
History Of ◽  
Complex Phenomena

This chapter aims to critically analyze both the world economy and the deglobalization processes under the assumption that they are the result of a dialectical evolution of economic, financial, political, and sanitary crisis. This dialectical movement of the history of the globalization and deglobalization processes is always a very complex phenomena of interactions between the economic agents and political actors, leading to both progressive and regressive events of economic growth, social development, and environmental sustainability. After a period of intensive economic, trade, and financial integration in the creation of a world economy system, suddenly the economic, financial, and sanitary dysfunctionalities emerged at the interior and created a reactive deglobalization process. However, what has been at the center are the international cooperation and trade relations determined by the need to expand the possibilities of satisfying human needs, including culture.

The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century

2001 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
Daniel Drache ◽  
Robert Gilpin
Keyword(s):  
21St Century ◽  
World Economy ◽  
Global Capitalism ◽  
The World

Comparative capitalisms and Latin American neodevelopmentalism: A critical political economy view

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Ebenau
Keyword(s):  
Political Economy ◽  
Latin American ◽  
World Economy ◽  
National Development ◽  
Case Analysis ◽  
Research Programme ◽  
Free Competition ◽  
The World ◽  
Comparative Capitalisms ◽  
Collective Actor

This article engages critically with an emerging Brazilian research programme, ‘varieties of capitalism and development in Latin America’, a perspective which seeks to ascertain the institutional chances of, and limits to, the implementation of state-led ‘national development strategies’. Adopting a critical political economy viewpoint, the text discusses the deficiencies inherent in this perspective and its neoinstitutionalist and neodevelopmentalist fundamentals. In particular, it questions the vision of the world economy as an arena of free competition and that of the nation-state as a ‘collective actor’, both of which are politically and analytically problematic. These criticisms are substantiated through evidence drawn from a case analysis of the recent trajectory of the Argentinian neodevelopmentalist project.

The Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century. By Robert Gilpin, with the assistance of Jean Millis Gilpin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000. 373p. $29.95.

2001 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-258
Author(s):  
Sylvia Ostry
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
21St Century ◽  
Global Economy ◽  
World Economy ◽  
Global Capitalism ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Financial Flows ◽  
Princeton University ◽  
The World ◽  
World Econ

The word globalization first appeared in the second half of the 1980s and now has become the most ubiquitous in the language of international relations. It has spawned a new vocabulary: globaloney (Why all the hype when the global economy was more integrated in the age of Queen Victo- ria?): globaphobia (the new, mainly mistaken, backlash); globeratti (the members of the international nongovernmen- tal organizations [INGOs] who travel around the world from conference to conference, except when they are on the Internet mobilizing for the next conference), and so on. For Robert Gilpin, among the world's most eminent scholars of international relations, globalization is insightfully defined as the deepening and widening integration of the world econ- omy by trade, financial flows, investment, and technology.

scholarly journals The Long Twentieth Century & The Cultural Turn: World-Historical Origins of the Cultural Economy

2011 ◽  
pp. 39-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin D. Brewer
Keyword(s):  
World Economy ◽  
Economic Restructuring ◽  
Global Capitalism ◽  
Cultural Economy ◽  
Finance Capital ◽  
The World ◽  
Institutional Foundations ◽  
Modern Condition ◽  
Cultural Turn ◽  
Do So

In this essay I link Giovanni Arrighi's world-historical framework in The Long Twentieth Centuryto debates about the "cultural turn" in global capitalism since the 1970s. I do so primarilythrough interrogation of the writings of one of the major figures in such debates: FredricJameson. In his Jameson's engagementwithArrighi's, he emphasizes the determinative influenceof finance capital on an expansion in the degree of cultural abstraction and fragmentation that isemblematic of the post-modern condition. Building on this linkage, I extend and elaborateArrighi's analysis of historical capitalism's cycles of accumulation, in which periods of materialexpansion give way to phases of financial expansion and accelerated restructuring of theorganizational and institutional foundations of the world-economy. I conclude that Jameson'sassertion of a link between the financialization of the world economy and post-modern culturalforms is best understand as a correlative rather than a causal relationship, for the growingsalience of finance capital and the new forms and degree of cultural abstraction are themselvesboth dimensions of the more fundamental socio-economic restructuring attending a period offinancial expansion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document