scholarly journals Rigid Body Trajectories in Different 6D Spaces

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol Linton ◽  
William Holderbaum ◽  
James Biggs

The objective of this paper is to show that the group with an imposed Lie-Poisson structure can be used to determine the trajectory in a spatial frame of a rigid body in Euclidean space. Identical results for the trajectory are obtained in spherical and hyperbolic space by scaling the linear displacements appropriately since the influence of the moments of inertia on the trajectories tends to zero as the scaling factor increases. The semidirect product of the linear and rotational motions gives the trajectory from a body frame perspective. It is shown that this cannot be used to determine the trajectory in the spatial frame. The body frame trajectory is thus independent of the velocity coupling. In addition, it is shown that the analysis can be greatly simplified by aligning the axes of the spatial frame with the axis of symmetry which is unchanging for a natural system with no forces and rotation about an axis of symmetry.

1999 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 379-380
Author(s):  
K. Goździewski ◽  
A.J. Maciejewski

We consider here the spin—orbit coupling influence on the relative orbital motion of two bodies interacting gravitationally. We assume that one of the bodies is spherically symmetric and the other possesses a plane of dynamical symmetry. In the full non-linear settings, this problem permits coplanar motion when the mass center of the spherically symmetric body moves in the plane. We used this simple model for a qualitative estimation of the changes of the relative orbit in two cases: A) the Sun-asteroid case (the fast rotating rigid body), B) a small satellite of a big planet in resonant rotation.The motion is described in the rigid body fixed frame. An appropriate change of physical units (Goźdiewski,1998a) leads to nondimensional dynamical variables and parameters. After that the Hamiltonian of the problem, written in polar variables, is the followingwhere (I1, I2, I3) are the principal moments of inertia, (r, φ) are the relative polar coordinates of the point mass in the body frame, (Pr, pφ) are the canonical momenta, (G3 represents the constant of total angular momentum, ε = (ro/r)2, and ro is the mean radius of the body.


1896 ◽  
Vol 59 (353-358) ◽  
pp. 185-189

1. It is well known that if a rigid body, whose principal moments of inertia are A, A, C, be set rotating about its axis of symmetry and then be subjected to a slight disturbance, it will execute oscillations about its mean position, in consequence of which the axis of rotation will undergo periodic displacements relatively to the body in a period which bears to the period of rotation the ratio A : C—A. The object of the present investigation is to determine to what extent this period will be modified if the body, instead of being perfectly rigid, is capable of elastic deformations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-124
Author(s):  
Géza Lámer

The motion (displacement) of the Euclidean space can be decomposed into translation and rotation. The two kinds of motion of the Euclidean space based on two structures of the Euclidean space: The first one is the topological structure, the second one is the idea of distance. The motion is such a (topological) map, that the distance of any two points remains the same. The bounded and closed domain of the Euclidean space is taken as a model of the rigid body. The bounded and closed domain of the Euclidean space is also taken as a model of the deformable solid body. The map – i.e. the displacement field – of the deformable solid body is continuous, but is not (necessarily) motion; the size and the shape of body can change. The material has atomic-molecular structure. In compliance with it, the material can be comprehended as a discrete system. In this case the elements of the material, as an atom, molecule, grain, can be comprehended as either material point, or rigid body. In the first case the kinematical freedom is the translation, in the latter case the translation and the rotation. In the paper we analyse how the kinematical behaviour of the discrete and continuous mechanical system can be characterise by translation and rotation. In the discrete system the two motions are independent variable. At the same time they characterise the movement of the body different way. For instance homogeneous local translation gives the global translation, but the homogeneous local rotation does not give the global rotation. To realise global rotation in a discrete system on one hand global rotation of the position of the discrete elements, on the other hand homogeneous local rotations of the discrete elements in harmony with global rotation are required. In the continuous system the two kinds of movement cannot be interpreted: a point cannot rotate, a rotation of surrounding of a point or direction can be interpreted. The kinematical characteristics, as the displacement (practically this is equal to translation) of (neighbourhood of) point, the rotation of surrounding of that point and the rotation of a direction went through that point are not independent variables: the translation of a point determines the rotation of the surrounding of that point as well as the rotation of a direction went through that point. With accordance this statement the displacement (practically translation) (field) as the only kinematical variable can be interpreted in the continuous medium.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameh Shenawy

Abstract Let $\mathcal {W}^{n}$ W n be the set of smooth complete simply connected n-dimensional manifolds without conjugate points. The Euclidean space and the hyperbolic space are examples of these manifolds. Let $W\in \mathcal {W}^{n}$ W ∈ W n and let A and B be two convex subsets of W. This note aims to investigate separation and slab horosphere separation of A and B. For example,sufficient conditions on A and B to be separated by a slab of horospheres are obtained. Existence and uniqueness of foot points and farthest points of a convex set A in $W\in \mathcal {W}$ W ∈ W are considered.


2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-543
Author(s):  
Ricardo Sa Earp ◽  
Eric Toubiana

We present another proof of a theorem due to Hoffman and Osserman in Euclidean space concerning the determination of a conformal immersion by its Gauss map. Our approach depends on geometric quantities, that is, the hyperbolic Gauss mapGand formulae obtained in hyperbolic space. We use the idea that the Euclidean Gauss map and the hyperbolic Gauss map with some compatibility relation determine a conformal immersion, proved in a previous paper.


Author(s):  
X. Tong ◽  
B. Tabarrok

Abstract In this paper the global motion of a rigid body subject to small periodic torques, which has a fixed direction in the body-fixed coordinate frame, is investigated by means of Melnikov’s method. Deprit’s variables are introduced to transform the equations of motion into a form describing a slowly varying oscillator. Then the Melnikov method developed for the slowly varying oscillator is used to predict the transversal intersections of stable and unstable manifolds for the perturbed rigid body motion. It is shown that there exist transversal intersections of heteroclinic orbits for certain ranges of parameter values.


2000 ◽  
Vol 203 (22) ◽  
pp. 3391-3396 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Walker

Whether a rigid body limits maneuverability depends on how maneuverability is defined. By the current definition, the minimum radius of the turn, a rigid-bodied, spotted boxfish Ostracion meleagris approaches maximum maneuverability, i.e. it can spin around with minimum turning radii near zero. The radius of the minimum space required to turn is an alternative measure of maneuverability. By this definition, O. meleagris is not very maneuverable. The observed space required by O. meleagris to turn is slightly greater than its theoretical minimum but much greater than that of highly flexible fish. Agility, the rate of turning, is related to maneuverability. The median- and pectoral-fin-powered turns of O. meleagris are slow relative to the body- and caudal-fin-powered turns of more flexible fish.


2012 ◽  
Vol 538-541 ◽  
pp. 3137-3144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Wei Wang ◽  
Cheng Jun Zhou ◽  
Cheng Lin ◽  
Jiao Yang Chen

The finite-element model of pure electric bus has been built and the free model analysis, displacement and stress analysis under bending condition and torsion condition have been conducted. Optimally design the pure electric bus frame based on multiple constrains. Reduce the body frame quality by 4.3% and meanwhile meet the modal and stress requirements.


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (06) ◽  
pp. 1250049 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. RASTI ◽  
S. A. FAZELZADEH

In this paper, multibody dynamic modeling and flutter analysis of a flexible slender vehicle are investigated. The method is a comprehensive procedure based on the hybrid equations of motion in terms of quasi-coordinates. The equations consist of ordinary differential equations for the rigid body motions of the vehicle and partial differential equations for the elastic deformations of the flexible components of the vehicle. These equations are naturally nonlinear, but to avoid high nonlinearity of equations the elastic displacements are assumed to be small so that the equations of motion can be linearized. For the aeroelastic analysis a perturbation approach is used, by which the problem is divided into a nonlinear flight dynamics problem for quasi-rigid flight vehicle and a linear extended aeroelasticity problem for the elastic deformations and perturbations in the rigid body motions. In this manner, the trim values that are obtained from the first problem are used as an input to the second problem. The body of the vehicle is modeled with a uniform free–free beam and the aeroelastic forces are derived from the strip theory. The effect of some crucial geometric and physical parameters and the acting forces on the flutter speed and frequency of the vehicle are investigated.


1969 ◽  
Vol 10 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 177-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Danicic

Let K be an open convex domain in n-dimensional Euclidean space, symmetric about the origin O, and of finite Jordan content (volume) V. With K are associated n positive constants λ1, λ2,…,λn, the ‘successive minima of K’ and n linearly independent lattice points (points with integer coordinates) P1, P2, …, Pn (not necessarily unique) such that all lattice points in the body λ,K are linearly dependent on P1, P2, …, Pj-1. The points P1,…, Pj lie in λK provided that λ > λj. For j = 1 this means that λ1K contains no lattice point other than the origin. Obviously


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document