scholarly journals Book Review: Reading at University: How to Improve Your Focus and Be More Critical. Jamie Q Roberts and Caitlin Hamilton

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-138
Author(s):  
Georgina Spencer ◽  

Writing this review during the United Kingdom’s COVID-19 lockdown, I am reminded of George Orwell’s essay ‘Confessions of a Book Reviewer’, “In a cold but stuffy bed-sitting room littered with cigarette ends and half-empty cups of tea, a man in a moth-eaten dressing-gown sits at a rickety table”. Although neither male nor a smoker, but certainly a tea drinker in need of a new dressing gown, what better time to read about reading? The terminology ‘reading’ for a degree has been replaced in everyday speech by ‘studying’, yet this archaic usage of reading put the importance of this activity front and centre of what was expected of students for success at university. While this focus in the everyday language has been removed, the skills of reading are no less vital to student success. Reading at University aims to dispel assumptions around academic reading and help students become more critical and productive in their reading. It is another addition to the study skills shelf and there is a lot of competition out there, so it really needs to be offering something different to compete.

2021 ◽  
pp. 119-129
Author(s):  
Erin Sharpe ◽  
Jocelyn Murtell ◽  
Alex Stoikos

Abstract There are children who bike regularly despite biking trending otherwise. For the past year, including through the global COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown, the researchers have been talking with biking-supportive parents and biking-active kids about their perspectives and experiences of biking. At the heart of this research the researchers wanted to know: what is it about biking that parents and children value so much that they are willing to keep riding, despite the changing context and attitudes toward children's biking? How do parents and children make sense of, negotiate and ultimately resist dominant discourses regarding children's biking, particularly children biking without adult supervision? Through the fall of 2019 and spring of 2020, the researchers held interviews with 19 parents and 24 kids (aged 10 to 16) who rode bikes regularly (at least once a the week), and whenever possible the researchers interviewed parents and children separately. The researchers prefer to use the descriptors of 'kids' (versus children) and 'biking' (versus cycling) to more closely reflect the everyday language used by kids to describe their bicycling activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document