scholarly journals Foundation biology students’ critical thinking ability: Self-efficacy versus actuality

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 36-50
Author(s):  
Gerry M. Rayner ◽  
◽  
Theo Papakonstantinou ◽  

Critical thinking (CT) is a highly valued skill, based on feedback from a wide range of stakeholders, and thus academics have long sought to embed CT into undergraduate curricula. In this study, we investigated foundation biology students’ self-efficacy of their CT skills (including three CT sub-elements), and whether such self-efficacies changed over a year of study. We also assessed students’ actual CT ability, and whether there were differences in self-efficacy and actual ability between male and female students. While students’ self-efficacy of their overall CT ability increased over the course of the year, this value was significantly lower than each of the CT sub-element efficacies, at both commencement and completion of the study. Conversely, students’ actual CT skills did not change over the year, although females scored higher than males in the one of the two units of study. We conclude that (i) there is a disconnect between our students’ self-efficacy of, and actual, CT ability; and (ii) there is a gender-based difference in their selfefficacy and actual CT ability. We recommend interventions to enhance foundation biology students’ understanding of CT and through this, improve the concordance between their self-efficacy of their CT skills and their actual CT ability.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syafruddin Kaliky ◽  
Fahruh Juhaevah

Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam menyelesaikan masalah identitas trigonometri ditinjau dari gender di SMA. Dalam pengambilan subjek dilakukan dengan cara think a loud. Siswa yang cenderung memenuhi kriteria berpikir kritis selanjutnya dikelompokkan berdasarkan gender. Berdasarkan data jenuh yang diperoleh berdasarkan masing-masing gender, selanjutnya di ambil masing-masing satu orang untuk dianalisis kemampuan berpikir kritis. Berdasarkan hasil analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis ditinjau dari gender dalam menyelesaikan masalah identitas trigonometri diperoleh bahwa siswa yang berjenis kelamin laki-laki dan siswa yang berjenis kelamin perempuan cenderung memenuhi 5 indikator berpikir kritis yaitu (1) mampu merumuskan pokok permasalahan; (2) mampu mengungkapkan fakta yang dibutuhkan dalam menyelesaikan suatu masalah; (3) mampu memilih argumen yang logis, relevan dan akurat; (4) mampu mendeteksi bias berbeda pada sudut pandang berbeda dan (5) Mampu menentukan akibat dari suatu pernyataan yang di ambil sebagai suatu keputusan. Dalam proses penyelesaian berdasarkan tahapannya tampak bahwa siswa perempuan cenderung teliti dan sistematis dibandingkan siswa laki-laki. Kata kunci: Kemampuan berpikir kritis, gender. Abstract This study aimed to analyze critical thinking ability when solved trigonometry identity problem based on gender difference in senior high school. Subject were selected by think a loud. Most of student can do critical thinking criteria and then make a group difference based on gender. Based on saturated data that have obtained for each gender, and then take one of them to analyze critical thinking ability. Based on result shows that male student and female student mostly can complete five indicators of critical thinking such as 1) can formulate the core problem; 2) can express fact that requirement to solve the problem; 3) can choose logically argument, relevant, and accurate; 4) can detect different refraction when get different solution; and 5) can determint cause of the statement that it have took as a decision. When solved the problem based on the its phase, showed that female student are more careful and more sistematic than male student.


Author(s):  
Triana Jamilatus Syarifah ◽  
Budi Usodo ◽  
Riyadi Riyadi

<p>Kompetensi dalam kurikulum 2013 adalah mengembangkan kreativitas, rasa ingin tahu, kemampuan merumuskan pertanyaan untuk membentuk pikiran kritis yang perlu untuk hidup cerdas dan belajar sepanjang hayat sehingga, siswa perlu dibekali dengan kemampuan-kemampuan tertentu untuk mengembangkan dan mengevaluasi argumen dalam suatu pemecahan masalah tertentu. Salah satu kemampuan yang harus dikembangkan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut adalah kemampuan berpikir kritis. Kemampuan berpikir kritis adalah kemampuan untuk mengidentifikasi, menganalisis, dan memecahkan masalah secara kreatif dan logis sehingga mampu menghasilkan keputusan yang tepat. Sementara itu, kemampuan berpikir kreatif dipengaruhi oleh keyakinan akan kemampuan diri yang dinamakan <em>self efficacy. </em><em>Self-efficacy </em>ini berbeda dengan aspirasi (cita-cita), karena cita-cita menggambarkan sesuatu yang ideal yang seharusnya (dapat dicapai), sedang efikasi menggambarkan penilaian kemampuan diri. Untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir  kritis dan <em>self efficacy</em>, pembelajaran matematika haruslah mengarah pada soal-soal tidak algoritmik dan komplek dalam menyelesaikan suatu masalah atau tugas, dan juga tidak dapat diprediksi, pendekatan latihan yang tepat, atau petunjuk yang tegas yang disarankan oleh tugas, petunjuk tugas atau contoh jalan keluar. Soal-soal yang seperti itu dikategorikan soal <em>Higher Order Thingking</em> (HOT). Oleh karena itu, soal kategori <em>Higher Order Thingking</em> (HOT) dapat digunakan untuk mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan <em>self efficacy </em>siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika siswa di sekolah dasar.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wahyu Hardiyanto ◽  
Rusgianto Heri Santoso

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan keefektifan pendekatan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) dan problem-based learning (PBL) setting think pair share (TPS) serta mendeskripsikan perbedaan keefektifan antara PBL setting TTW dan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data adalah tes prestasi belajar, tes kemampuan berpikir kritis dan angket self-efficacy siswa. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis dengan menggunakan one sample t-test, dan analisis multivariat (MANOVA). One sample t-test dilakukan untuk menguji keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan keefektifan pendekatan PBL setting TPS, sedangkan analisis multivariat (MANOVA) dilakukan untuk menguji perbedaan keefektifan antara kedua treatment tersebut ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan PBL setting TTW dan pendekatan PBL setting TPS efektif ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. Selain itu hasil analisis multivariat menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan keefektifan yang signifikan antara pendekatan PBL setting TTW dengan pendekatan PBL setting TPS ditinjau dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan self-efficacy siswa. The Effectiveness of PBL Setting TTW and TPS Seen from Students Learning Achievement, Critical Thinking and Self-Efficacy  AbstractThis study aims to describe the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) setting think talk write (TTW) and PBL setting think pair share (TPS) and describe the difference of the effectiveness between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and self-efficacy of grade students. This research is quasi-experimental research. The research instruments to collect the data are a learning achievement test, a test to examine the ability to think critically and a self-efficacy questionnaire. One sample t-test was conducted to examine the effectiveness PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. Meanwhile, multivariate test (MANOVA) was carried out to determine the difference between PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS. The results show that both PBL setting TTW and PBL setting TPS are effective in terms of students learning achievements, critical thinking ability, and self-efficacy and there is no significant difference between the effectiveness of PBL setting TTW and the effectiveness of PBL setting TPS in terms of learning achievements, critical thinking ability and student self-efficacy.


KadikmA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 18
Author(s):  
Anggraini Dwi Ikhwani

This study aims to describe the critical thinking ability of male and female students in solving jumping task problems on proportion. The jumping task question used is a question with level C4 in Taksonomi Bloom. This type of research used is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The data collection method used consisted of the documentation mathematics students report in the first semester, critical thinking test, and interviews. The subjects used in this study are 32 students of class VII G on SMPN 4 Jember. consists of 16 male students and 16 female students. The students are divided into three groups based on the mathematics students report in the first semester. The groups are high, medium, and low category mathematics ability. The results showed that male students with high category mathematics ability had TKBK 3 (critical), male students with medium category mathematics ability had TKBK 1 (less critical), male students with low category mathematics ability had TKBK 0 (not critical). While female students with high category mathematics ability had TKBK 3 (critical), female students with medium category mathematics ability had TKBK 2 (quite critical), female students with low category mathematics ability had TKBK 1 (less critical).


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-339
Author(s):  
Yasin Yasin ◽  
Abin Syamsudin ◽  
Daeng Arifin ◽  
Waska Warta

tudents' critical thinking ability in teaching and learning activities on human digestive system material is still low, where students are less skilled in collecting and analyzing data, relevant facts and identifying problems, so students have difficulty in solving problems with alternatives that fit the logic. Based on the results of the hypothetical test analysis obtained t hit > t daf (1.67), then accept. Hi means that there is an influence on the use of audiovisual learning media on critical thinking ability in human digestive system materials in grade VIII students of SMP Negeri 1 And SMP Negeri 2 Sindang Indramayu Regency. From the calculation of t test above obtained t count = 4,957 while t table at the level of trust 95% (significance 5%) with dk numerator is 1.70. Because t count (4,957) > t table (1,70) Hi accepted means there is an influence on the use of audiovisual learning media on self-efficacy in human digestive system materials in grade VIII students smp negeri 1 Filled And SMP Negeri 2 Sindang Indramayu. The result of this study is a description of the efficacy of students of grade VIII SMP Negeri 1 Filled And SMP Negeri 2 Sindang Indramayu Regency, by using audiovisual media learning system in human digestive system materials belongs to high category. There is an influence of audiovisual media learning system on self-efficacy on human digestive system materials in students VIII SMP Negeri 1 Filled And SMP Negeri 2 Sindang Indramayu.


EDUSAINS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-225
Author(s):  
Siti Mulya Agnah ◽  
Rusdi Rusdi ◽  
Yanti Herlanti

PENGARUH METODE PETA ARGUMEN DAN EFIKASI DIRI TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS  AbstractThe aim of this study is to know the effect of argument mapping method and self efficacy on critical thinking ability and interaction between argument mapping method and self efficacy on critical thinking ability. The method that used in this research is quasi experiment with 2 x 2 factorial design. The instruments that used in this research are critical thinking ability essay test and self efficacy questionnaire. The subject of this study is students of XI IPA 1 and 3 from SMAN in Jakarta totalling 72 students. Samples were taken using simple random sampling. Analysis of data used two way anova. The result showed that : 1) There is effect of argument mapping method on critical thinking ability with p< 0,05, p = 0,000. 2). There is effect of self efficacy on argument mapping method and self efficacy on critical thinking ability with p< 0,05, p = 0,000. 3) There is no interaction between argument mapping method and self efficacy on critical thinking ability with p> 0,05, p = 0,602.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh metode peta argumen dan efikasi diri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis, serta interaksi antara pengaruh metode peta argumen dan efikasi diri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah kuasi eksperimen dengan desain ANAVA dua arah dengan rancangan faktorial 2x2. Populasi penelitian ialah XI MIPA SMA Negeri di Jakarta dengan sampel penelitian sebanyak dua kelas, yaitu XI MIPA 1dan 3 yang berisi 72 peserta didik. Instrumen yang digunakan pada penelitian ini berupa tes uraian dan kuesioner efikasi diri. Berdasarkan analisis data hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) terdapat pengaruh metode peta argumen terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik dengan p<0,05, p = 0,00, (2) terdapat pengaruh efikasi diri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik dengan p<0,05, p = 0,00, (3) tidak terdapat interaksi pengaruh metode peta argumen dan efikasi diri terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik dengan p>0,05, p = 0,602. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document