A systematic review on interventions increasing organ donation

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Yang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Organ Donation

scholarly journals Impact of Donation Physicians on Deceased Organ Donation: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet E. Squires ◽  
Laura D. Aloisio ◽  
Wilmer John Santos ◽  
Danielle Cho-Young ◽  
Monica Taljaard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
Deceased Donor ◽  
Organ Donors ◽  
Consent Rate ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Deceased Organ Donation

Abstract Background: An emerging strategy to increase deceased organ donation is to use dedicated donation physicians to champion organ donation. We sought to conduct a systematic review of the effectiveness of donation physicians in improving organ donation outcomes.Methods: A systematic review was conducted following Cochrane principles. MEDLINE, Embase, and CINHAL databases were searched from inception to March 26, 2020. Quantitative studies examining the effects of donation physicians on all deceased organ donation outcomes were considered for inclusion. Review articles, editorials and opinion articles, and case studies were excluded. Study selection was completed independently by two team members; all discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Two team members independently extracted data from studies. Results: A total of 1,017 studies were screened, and 12 met inclusion criteria. Included studies were published between 1994 and 2019. Half used an interrupted time series design (n = 6; 50%), three (25%) were cohort studies, and three (25%) used a before-and-after study design. Outcomes (reported in greater than 50% of included articles) included consent/refusal rate (n = 8; 67%), number of potential donors (n = 7; 58%), and number of actual donors (n = 7; 58%). Across studies and design types, there was an increase in potential organ donors ranging from 8 to 143% (Mdn = 33%), an increase in actual organ donors from 15 to 113% (Mdn = 27%), an increase in donor consent rate from -3 to 258% (Mdn = 12%) and an increase in deceased donor transplants from 13 to 24% (Mdn = 19%) following the introduction of donation physicians.Conclusions: Donation physicians have the potential to significantly improve deceased organ donation. Further implementation and evaluation of donation physician programs is warranted. However, implementation should be undertaken with a clear plan for a methodologically rigorous evaluation of outcomes.

scholarly journals Modifiable factors influencing relatives' decision to offer organ donation: systematic review

BMJ ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 338 (apr21 2) ◽  
pp. b991-b991 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Simpkin ◽  
L. C. Robertson ◽  
V. S. Barber ◽  
J. D. Young
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Modifiable Factors

scholarly journals P098: Solid organ donation from the emergency department - a systematic review

CJEM ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (S1) ◽  
pp. S91-S91
Author(s):  
J. McCallum ◽  
B. Ellis ◽  
I. G. Stiell
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Arrest ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Organ Transplant ◽  
Donation After Cardiac Death ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Organ Donors ◽  
Human Adults

Introduction: There is a significant gap between the number of organ donors and people awaiting an organ transplant; therefore it is essential that all potential donors are identified. Given the nature of Emergency Medicine it is a potential source of organ donors. The purpose of this study is to determine what percent of successful donors come from the Emergency Department (ED) and whether there are any missed potential donors. Methods: Electronic searches of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL were performed July 7, 2017 using PRISMA guidelines. Primary literature in human adults were included if they described identification of patients in the ED who went on to become successful solid organ donors, or described missed potential donors in the ED. Data on the total population of actual or missed donors was required to allow calculation of a percentage. Studies describing non-solid organ donation, consent, ethics, survey of attitudes, teaching curricula, procurement techniques, donation outside the ED, and recipient factors were excluded. 2 authors independently screened articles for inclusion and discrepancies were resolved through consensus. Quality was assessed using STROBE for observational studies. Heterogeneity of patient populations precluded pooling of the data to conduct a meta-analysis. Results: 1058 articles were identified, 17 duplicates were removed, 800 articles were excluded based on title and abstract, and 217 full text articles were excluded, yielding 24 articles for the systematic review. For neurologic determination of death (NDD), ED patients comprised 4 44% of successful donors. ED death reviews revealed 0 84% of patients dying in the ED are missed as potential donors and hospital-wide death reviews revealed 13 80.9% of missed donors die in the ED. For donation after cardiac death (DCD), 4 20% of successful donors came from the ED and studies investigating potential donors suggest 2 36% of patients dying the in the ED could be potential DCD donors. The most common population of successful DCD organ donors was in traumatic cardiopulmonary arrest (TCPA), with 3.6 8.9% of TCPA patients presenting to the ED becoming successful donors. Conclusion: Patients dying in the Emergency Department are a significant source of both successful organ donors and missed potential donors. Emergency physicians should be familiar with their local organ donation protocol to ensure potential organ donors are not missed.

scholarly journals Solid organ donation from the emergency department – A systematic review

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 626-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica McCallum ◽  
Brittany Ellis ◽  
Sonny Dhanani ◽  
Ian G. Stiell
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Organ Donors ◽  
Determination Of Death ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

ABSTRACTObjectivesA significant gap exists between people awaiting an organ transplant and organ donors. The purpose of this study was to determine what percent of successful donors come from the emergency department (ED), whether there are any missed donors, and to identify factors associated with successful and missed donation.MethodsThis systematic review used electronic searches of EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL according to PRISMA guidelines on July 7, 2017. We included primary literature in adults describing successful and missed organ donation. Two authors independently screened articles, and discrepancies were resolved through consensus. Quality was assessed using the STROBE checklist.ResultsThis systematic review identified 1,058 articles, and 25 articles were included. For neurologic determination of death, ED patients comprised 4%–50% of successful donors and 3.6%–8.9% of successful donors for donation after circulatory determination of death. ED death reviews revealed up to 84% of missed neurologic determination of death, and 46.2% of missed circulatory determination of death donors who died in the ED are missed due to a failure to refer for consideration of organ donation. Clinical heterogeneity precluded pooling of the data to conduct a meta-analysis.ConclusionsThe ED is a source of actual and missed donors. Potential donors are often missed due to incorrect assumptions regarding eligibility criteria and failure of the healthcare team to refer for consideration of donation. ED healthcare professionals should be aware of organ donation referral protocols at their institution to ensure that no organ donors are missed.

Adolescent classroom education on knowledge and attitudes about deceased organ donation: A systematic review

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin Ho-Ting Li ◽  
Amanda M. Rosenblum ◽  
Immaculate F. Nevis ◽  
Amit X. Garg
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Knowledge And Attitudes ◽  
Deceased Organ Donation ◽  
Classroom Education

Guiding Strategies for the Future of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Systematic Review of Organ Donation Campaigns

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. 922-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Mills ◽  
Julia H. Felsenheld ◽  
Zoe P. Berman ◽  
Allyson R. Alfonso ◽  
Gustave K. Diep ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Organ Donation ◽  
Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation ◽  
The Future
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document