Stakeholders' perceptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) : case studies from Bangladesh and Pakistan

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asghar Naeem Malik
2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar Marques ◽  
Pilar Presas ◽  
Alexandra Simon

This study addresses the heterogeneity of family firms in their engagement with corporate social responsibility (CSR). We build on stewardship theory and socioemotional wealth to explore the foundations of CSR in family firms and to examine whether the extent of engagement is based on values, and how and why this happens. We use the interpretative method of grounded theory to address these questions. Based on 12 case studies of Spanish family firms, this article illustrates the patterns of influence of family involvement and values in explaining the extent and scope of CSR.


Info ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 24-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewan Sutherland

Purpose The paper aims to examine the reporting of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the telecommunications sector and to consider how the obligations and regulations imposed on operators affect what is considered as CSR compared to other sectors. Design/methodology/approach The paper provides a review of the academic literature on CSR, relating this to developments in the regulatory state and the adoption by governments and intergovernmental bodies of CSR instruments. Also, the paper conducts an analysis of coltan, greenhouse gas emissions and privacy as short case studies where CSR issues and regulations meet. Findings Many activities that in other sectors would be considered CSR are required by licence or legislation, together with much more detailed scrutiny and reporting. Originality/value The paper provides a review of existing literature on CSR in telecommunications, related to theories about CSR and the regulatory state.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 176
Author(s):  
Rachmad Robby Nugraha ◽  
Siti Hamidah ◽  
Moch. Fadli

the purpose of the author of this article is to discuss the meaning of propriety and reason- ableness in Article 74 paragraph (2) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Compa- nies (UUPT) on a corporate social responsibility agreement in the distribution. The method uses normative legal studies with legislative approaches, concepts, and case studies. The propriety meaning is conformity based on balance, meaning that it must fulfill the element of conformity with the situation or the balance between the company’s ability to risk the activities of the company. Fairness is interpreted as something that should or should be done based on the order and the appropriate rules. Compliance and reasonableness are viewed from the point of view of the amount that is spent on the company’s CSR must be in proportion and not contrary to the provisions of the legislation. Compliance and reasonableness are related to the number, objectives, and form of the agreement. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Concetta Nazzaro ◽  
Marcello Stanco ◽  
Giuseppe Marotta

This paper contributes to the theoretical debate in agri-food economics focusing on corporate social responsibility. Specifically, it aims to define an interpretative model of the processes of social responsibility and value creation in the food industry. An empirical investigation was conducted using an analysis of case studies—representative of sustainable innovation and social responsibility models—as well as in-depth interviews and focus groups with managers of food industries and the sector’s experts. The paper focuses on a topic that has yet to be analysed in agri-food economics literature: corporate social responsibility as a value-creating strategy. Further, it proposes a life cycle model of social responsibility in business processes. The study findings reveal that corporate social responsibility actions may affect the agri-food process and/or the product. Specifically, the investigated case studies reveal that the production sector in which a company operates strongly influences its orientation towards one or more corporate social responsibility dimensions. This study’s results contribute to the debate on the topic and provide useful insights for practitioners and policy-makers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Vandy Yoga Swara ◽  
Erwinton Simatupang

<p>Many believe that corporate social responsibility (CSR) is able to present social license to operate (SLO) of company’s community and stakeholders. In fact, CSR is not in line with SLO. The root of the problem lies on a CSR approach that differenciates economic and social value. Therefore, pressure, expectation, and need of company’s community and stakeholder will not be able to be met by a corporation despite it has proposed the best CSR programs. Through a series of literature reviews on SLOs and case studies at one company, this article offers an alternative approach to present SLO on business by emphasizing corporate social entrepreneurship (CSE) spirit.</p>


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina A. Cedillo Torres ◽  
Mercedes Garcia-French ◽  
Rosemarie Hordijk ◽  
Kim Nguyen ◽  
Lana Olup

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document