scholarly journals An Outlook on Intangible Assets and Transfer Pricing in China

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jierui (Jerry) Zhan
Keyword(s):  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Transfer Pricing

scholarly journals Pengaruh Mekanisme Bonus, Exchange Rate, Intangible Assets, dan Kompensasi Rugi Fiskal Terhadap Keputusan Perusahaan Melakukan Transfer Pricing

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 3125-3143
Author(s):  
Weni Avri Rahman ◽  
Charoline Cheisviyanny
Keyword(s):  
Exchange Rate ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Loss Compensation ◽  
Positive Effect

This research aims to examine to analyze the effect of bonus scheme, exchange rate, intangible assets, and fiscal loss compensation on the company’s decision to do transfer pricing. The population in this research are all of the companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2014 until 2018. The sample of study was determined by using purposive sampling method, and that total sample 93 companies. The data used secondary data and collected by documentation at www.idx.com. This research use logistic regression analysis as analysis method. The result of analysis in this research showed that bonus scheme, exchange rate, and fiscal loss compensation had no effect on the company’s decision to do transfer pricing. Intangible Assets had a positive effect on the company’s decision to do transfer pricing

scholarly journals Determinant of Transfer Pricing Decision in Infrastructure, Utility, and Transportation Companies

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 150
Author(s):  
Maharamya Karuna Anggani ◽  
Trisni Suryarini
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Sample Selection ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Tax Planning ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Thin Capitalization

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui besarnya pengaruh tax planning, thin capitalization, dan intangible assets terhadap keputusan perusahaan dalam melakukan transfer pricing. Penelitian ini menggunakan 78 perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) tahun 2014 hingga 2018 sebagai populasi penelitian. Pemilihan sampel penelitian ini menggunakan metode purposive sampling, dan diperoleh hanya 65 data yang dapat digunakan untuk data analisis. Metode analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis statistik deskriptif dan analisis statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan uji linear berganda untuk model regresi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa thin capitalization dan intangible assets tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap keputusan perusahaan dalam melakukan transfer pricing. Sedangkan, tax planning berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap keputusan perusahaan dalam melakukan transfer pricing.  Kata kunci: Transfer Pricing; Tax Planning; Thin Capitalization; Intangible Assets ABSTRACTThis study aims to analyze and determine the affect of tax planning, thin capitalization, and intangible assets on company decisions in transfer pricing. This study uses 78 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2014 to 2018 as the study population. The sample selection of this study used a purposive sampling method, and the final sample was obtained by 65 data which is can use for data of analysis. Data analysis methods used in this study are descriptive statistical analysis and inferential statistical analysis using multiple linear tests for regression models. The results showed that thin capitalization and intangible assets did not significantly influence the company's decision to transfer pricing. At the same time, tax planning significantly influenced the company's decision to transfer pricing.Keywords: Transfer Pricing; Tax Planning; Thin Capitalization; Intangible Assets 

scholarly journals TRANSFER PRICING DECISIONS AT MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES IN INDONESIA: TAX EXPENSES, FOREIGN OWNERSHIP, INTANGIBLE ASSETS

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Anggun Budi Utami S Depari ◽  
Reza Ramadhan ◽  
Amrie Firmansyah
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Foreign Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Pricing Decisions ◽  
Final Sample

<p>This study aims to examine the effect of tax expenses, foreign ownership on transfer pricing decisions. This study employs quantitative methods. This study's data type is secondary data from the financial statements of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2017 to 2019. Data were obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange's official website at http: //www.idx.co.id. Sampling was conducted by purposive sampling technique with a final sample of 30 observations. Hypothesis testing is done by multiple regression analysis with panel data. This study concludes that tax expenses and intangible assets are positively associated with transfer pricing decisions, while foreign ownership is not associated with transfer pricing decisions. This study indicates that Indonesia's Tax Authority needs to exercise tighter supervision on MNCs with intangible assets.</p>

Multinationality, Tax Havens, Intangible Assets, and Transfer Pricing Aggressiveness: An Empirical Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grantley Taylor ◽  
Grant Richardson ◽  
Roman Lanis
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Analysis ◽  
Multinational Firms ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Tax Havens ◽  
Joint Effects ◽  
Tax Haven ◽  
Tax Benefits ◽  
The Individual

ABSTRACT This study examines the individual and joint effects of multinationality, tax havens, and intangible assets on transfer pricing aggressiveness. Based on a hand-collected sample of 286 publicly listed U.S. multinational firms over the 2006–2012 period (2,002 firm-year observations), the regression results indicate that multinationality, tax haven utilization, and intangible assets are significantly positively associated with transfer pricing aggressiveness. The regression results also show that firms magnify their international transfer pricing aggressiveness through the joint effects of intangible assets, multinationality, and tax havens. Overall, the empirical findings demonstrate that the utilization of tax havens and the level of intangible assets are economically important factors that assist firms in obtaining tax benefits through transfer pricing aggressiveness. Data Availability: All data are available from public sources identified in the paper.

GlaxoSmithKline Plc.: International Transfer Pricing and Taxation

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 749-759
Author(s):  
Mahendra R. Gujarathi
Keyword(s):  
Multinational Corporations ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Tax Credits ◽  
Internal Revenue Service ◽  
Internal Revenue ◽  
The U.S

This comprehensive case intends to develop your understanding of the complexities involved in the international transfer pricing and taxation of intangible assets. The backdrop for the case is GlaxoSmithKline's $5.2 billion settlement in 2006 with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. You are required to provide possible rationales for the positions advocated by the Company as well as the IRS. You are also required to present calculations under different transfer pricing methods, identify the most appropriate method, compute Foreign Tax Credits for different scenarios, and suggest possible strategies for multinational corporations to reduce the odds of negative settlements with tax authorities.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Pajak, Mekanisme Bonus, Kepemilikan Asing, Debt Covenant Dan Intangible Assets Terhadap Transfer Pricing (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Tahun 2015 – 2017)

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Destriana Br Ginting ◽  
Yulita Triadiarti ◽  
Erny Luxy Purba
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Multiple Regression Analysis ◽  
Multiple Regression ◽  
Intangible Assets ◽  
Transfer Pricing ◽  
Foreign Ownership ◽  
Statistical Test ◽  
Coefficient Of Determination ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Debt Covenant

Abstrak :  The problem in this research is Transfer pricing is a company policy in determining the price of transactions between division members in a multinational company, which makes it easy for companies to adjust internal prices for goods, services and intangible assets traded so as not to create prices that are too low or too high. But in practice transfer pricing is one of the efforts of corporate tax planning with the aim of minimizing the tax burden that must be paid by engineering transfer prices between companies that have special relationships. The population of this research is 143 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2017. The research sample was 16 companies with purposive sampling method, with quantitative research types. The data used is secondary data, namely the company's financial statements obtained from www.idx.co.id. The data analysis technique used is descriptive statistics, classic assumption test, multiple regression analysis, coefficient of determination, F-statistical test, and t-statistical test. The data analysis technique used is descriptive statistics, classic assumption test, multiple regression analysis, coefficient of determination, F-statistical test, and t-statistical test. The dependent variable in this study is Transfer Pricing which is Proxied with RTP ( Related Party Transaction) . Independent variables used are Profitability, Tax, Bonus Mechanisms, Foreign Ownership , Debt Covenant and Intangible Assets . The analytical method used in this study is multiple regression analysis with SPSS 20. Based on the results of this study simultaneously Profitability, Taxes, Mechanisms of Bonuses, Foreign Ownership, Debt Covenants and Intangible Assets no significant effect on Transfer Pricing . Partially Only Intangible Assets that affect Transfer Pricing .  The conclusion of this study is that Profitability has no effect on Transfer Pricing, Tax has no effect on Transfer Pricing, Bonus Mechanism has no effect on Transfer Pricing, Foreign Ownership has no effect on Transfer Pricing, Debt Covenant has no effect on Transfer Pricing and Intangible Assets Influence Transfer Pricing. Keywords: Transfer Pricing , profitability, Taxes, Bonus Mechanisms, Foreign Ownership, Debt Covenant , Intangible Assets

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document