scholarly journals The United States’ Individual and Corporate Income Tax : Future Reform possibilities

1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K McNulty
2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (7) ◽  
pp. 2679-2691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel Mertens ◽  
Morten O. Ravn

In this reply to a comment by Jentsch and Lunsford, we show that the evidence for economic and statistically significant macroeconomic effects of tax changes in Mertens and Ravn (2013) remains present for a range of asymptotically valid inference methods. (JEL E23, E62, H24, H25, H31, H32)


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Mercer-Blackman ◽  
Shiela Camingue-Romance

Using panel data at the country and sector level spanning almost 15 years, this paper shows that the corporate income tax rate does not affect the United States’ inward foreign direct investment once market size, costs, openness, and the business environment, are taken into account. This is true for United States foreign direct investment bound to developing Asia and across most sectors.


Subject Impact of US tax plans on Mexico. Significance US tax reforms have put Mexico’s competitiveness under pressure, slashing US corporate income tax and creating additional incentives for capital-intensive investments. The new rules are especially relevant for manufacturing firms which form Mexico’s largest source of foreign direct investment (FDI) but are the recipients of the some of the plan’s most generous benefits. Impacts The tax plan may accelerate more capital-intensive, highly automated manufacturing investment in the United States. The erosion of Mexico’s tax advantage will reinforce pressure to keep wages low, exacerbating political tensions. Pressure from Mexican business for a parallel tax cut is likely to mount as the elections approach.


1927 ◽  
Vol 37 (148) ◽  
pp. 637
Author(s):  
J. Sykes ◽  
Harrison B. Spaulding

2021 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 745-790
Author(s):  
Susann Sturm

This study examines the complexity of Canada's corporate income tax system from the perspective of multinational corporations and compares it with the complexity of the US system, also taking into account measures of complexity for 19 other member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The author finds that with regard to the Canadian tax code, the most complex laws are those on corporate reorganization, transfer pricing, and controlled foreign corporations, and with regard to the Canadian tax framework, the most complex areas are tax audits, tax-law enactment, and tax guidance. In comparison with other OECD countries, Canada is remarkably similar to the United States. Both countries have a medium level of overall complexity, and both have a more complex tax code but a less complex tax framework than other countries. However, a closer examination of the Canadian and US tax codes and tax frameworks reveals some significant differences in complexity levels, particularly in respect of certain tax laws.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Danielle Thorne

<p>This paper analyses the Double Irish and Dutch Sandwich tax structures used by large multinational enterprises. These structures enable companies to shift significant profits to offshore tax havens through the use of wholly owned subsidiaries in Ireland and the Netherlands. Application of the New Zealand General Anti-Avoidance rule in s BG 1 of the Income Tax Act 2007 reveals that any attempt to counteract these structures would be highly fact dependent. The paper concludes that it would be possible to apply the rule, but that there would be practical difficulties in relation to enforceability of the Commissioner’s ruling. A similar result was reached when applying the United States General Anti-Avoidance rule. The attempted application of the General Anti-Avoidance rules reveals a fundamental flaw in the income tax system. That is, the inability of the current system to regulate and control intangible resources and technology based transactions.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document