scholarly journals The Corporate Income Tax: United States of America Report

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Ordower
2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (7) ◽  
pp. 2679-2691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karel Mertens ◽  
Morten O. Ravn

In this reply to a comment by Jentsch and Lunsford, we show that the evidence for economic and statistically significant macroeconomic effects of tax changes in Mertens and Ravn (2013) remains present for a range of asymptotically valid inference methods. (JEL E23, E62, H24, H25, H31, H32)


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie Mercer-Blackman ◽  
Shiela Camingue-Romance

Using panel data at the country and sector level spanning almost 15 years, this paper shows that the corporate income tax rate does not affect the United States’ inward foreign direct investment once market size, costs, openness, and the business environment, are taken into account. This is true for United States foreign direct investment bound to developing Asia and across most sectors.


2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 547-566
Author(s):  
Leonard Willemse ◽  
David Badenhorst

The premature termination of lease agreements is a common occurrence in the South African and international business arena. When a lease is terminated prematurely, it is currently the practice that the person who terminates the lease agreement has to pay a termination penalty. This article investigates the income tax treatment possibilities of the penalty paid by a lessor. For purposes of this investigation the income tax treatment of lease termination penalties in Australia, Canada, the United States of America and South Africa are investigated. This is done in order to identify guidelines and principles that could possibly be used in a South African context, which may lead to the efficient and correct treatment of lease termination penalties for South African income tax purposes. The investigation concludes that the factors surrounding the lease termination transaction as well as the intention of the parties involved, will determine the appropriate income tax treatment of the penalty. The question must be asked whether or not the termination penalty was incurred as part of a ‘profit-making scheme’ and what happens after the penalty has been incurred. It is recommended that, where the penalty is deemed to be capital in nature, the merit of allowing some sort of capital allowance (similar to the one used in the United States of America) should be investigated.


Subject Impact of US tax plans on Mexico. Significance US tax reforms have put Mexico’s competitiveness under pressure, slashing US corporate income tax and creating additional incentives for capital-intensive investments. The new rules are especially relevant for manufacturing firms which form Mexico’s largest source of foreign direct investment (FDI) but are the recipients of the some of the plan’s most generous benefits. Impacts The tax plan may accelerate more capital-intensive, highly automated manufacturing investment in the United States. The erosion of Mexico’s tax advantage will reinforce pressure to keep wages low, exacerbating political tensions. Pressure from Mexican business for a parallel tax cut is likely to mount as the elections approach.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document