scholarly journals A memory facilitation effect due to the comparison process within self-choice

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-47
Author(s):  
Mariko ITOH ◽  
Saho AYABE-KANAMURA ◽  
Tadashi KIKUCHI
Keyword(s):  
Comparison Process ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Memory Facilitation

Investigation into the significance of task difficulty and divided allocation of resources on the glucose memory facilitation effect

2002 ◽  
Vol 160 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra I. Sünram-Lea ◽  
Jonathan K. Foster ◽  
Paula Durlach ◽  
Catalina Perez
Keyword(s):  
Task Difficulty ◽  
Allocation Of Resources ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Memory Facilitation

scholarly journals Glucose enhancement of human memory: A comprehensive research review of the glucose memory facilitation effect

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 770-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Smith ◽  
Leigh M. Riby ◽  
J. Anke M. van Eekelen ◽  
Jonathan K. Foster
Keyword(s):  
Human Memory ◽  
Research Review ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Memory Facilitation

The Influence of Fat Co-administration on the Glucose Memory Facilitation Effect

2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra I. Sünram-Lea ◽  
Jonathan K. Foster ◽  
Paula Durlach ◽  
Catalina Perez
Keyword(s):  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Memory Facilitation

Observing painful events in others leads to a temporally extended general response facilitation in the self

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Michael Orquiola Galang
Keyword(s):  
Motor System ◽  
Response Times ◽  
Motor Evoked Potentials ◽  
Painful Stimulus ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Motor Responses ◽  
Response Facilitation ◽  
Task Instructions ◽  
General Response ◽  
Muscle Specificity

Excitability in the motor cortex is modulated when we observe other people receiving a painful stimulus (Avenanti et al., 2005). However, the task dependency of this modulation is not well understood, as different paradigms have yielded seemingly different results. Previous neurophysiological work employing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) suggests that watching another person’s hand being pierced by a needle leads to a muscle specific inhibition, assessed via motor evoked potentials. Results from previous behavioural studies suggest that overt behavioural responses are facilitated due to pain observation (Morrison et al., 2007a; 2007b). There are several paradigmatic differences both between typical TMS studies and behavioural studies, and within behavioural studies themselves, that limit our overall understanding of how pain observation affects the motor system. In the current study, we combine elements of typical TMS experimental designs in a behavioural assessment of how pain observation affects overt behavioural responding. Specifically, we examined the muscle specificity, timing, and direction of modulation of motor responses due to pain observation. To assess muscle specificity, we employed pain and non-pain videos from previous TMS studies in a Go/No-Go task in which participants responded by either pressing a key with their index finger or with their foot. To assess timing, we examined response times for Go signals presented at 0ms or 500ms after the video. Results indicate that observation of another individual receiving a painful stimulus leads to a non-effector specific, temporally extended response facilitation (e.g., finger and foot facilitation present at 0ms and 500ms delays), compared to observation of non-pain videos. This behavioural facilitation effect differs from the typical motor inhibition seen in TMS studies, and we argue that the effects of pain observation on the motor system are state-dependent, with different states induced via task instructions. We discuss our results in light of previous work on motor responses to pain observation.

scholarly journals Neural mechanisms of credit card spending

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sachin Banker ◽  
Derek Dunfield ◽  
Alex Huang ◽  
Drazen Prelec
Keyword(s):  
Credit Card ◽  
Credit Cards ◽  
Purchase Behavior ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Product Price ◽  
Personal Credit ◽  
Psychological Mechanisms ◽  
Network Activation ◽  
Payment Instruments ◽  
Reward Network

AbstractCredit cards have often been blamed for consumer overspending and for the growth in household debt. Indeed, laboratory studies of purchase behavior have shown that credit cards can facilitate spending in ways that are difficult to justify on purely financial grounds. However, the psychological mechanisms behind this spending facilitation effect remain conjectural. A leading hypothesis is that credit cards reduce the pain of payment and so ‘release the brakes’ that hold expenditures in check. Alternatively, credit cards could provide a ‘step on the gas,’ increasing motivation to spend. Here we present the first evidence of differences in brain activation in the presence of real credit and cash purchase opportunities. In an fMRI shopping task, participants purchased items tailored to their interests, either by using a personal credit card or their own cash. Credit card purchases were associated with strong activation in the striatum, which coincided with onset of the credit card cue and was not related to product price. In contrast, reward network activation weakly predicted cash purchases, and only among relatively cheaper items. The presence of reward network activation differences highlights the potential neural impact of novel payment instruments in stimulating spending—these fundamental reward mechanisms could be exploited by new payment methods as we transition to a purely cashless society.

Brains that Fire Together Wire Together: Interbrain Plasticity Underlies Learning in Social Interactions

2021 ◽  
pp. 107385842199668
Author(s):  
Simone G. Shamay-Tsoory
Keyword(s):  
Social Interactions ◽  
Brain Structures ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Long Term Experience

Social interactions are powerful determinants of learning. Yet the field of neuroplasticity is deeply rooted in probing changes occurring in synapses, brain structures, and networks within an individual brain. Here I synthesize disparate findings on network neuroplasticity and mechanisms of social interactions to propose a new approach for understanding interaction-based learning that focuses on the dynamics of interbrain coupling. I argue that the facilitation effect of social interactions on learning may be explained by interbrain plasticity, defined here as the short- and long-term experience-dependent changes in interbrain coupling. The interbrain plasticity approach may radically change our understanding of how we learn in social interactions.

High-Resolution Facial Feature Saliency Mapping

Perception ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel D Haig
Keyword(s):  
Image Processing ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
Facial Feature ◽  
Human Beings ◽  
Comparison Process ◽  
Compression Technique ◽  
Feature Saliency ◽  
Basic Set ◽  
Computational Speed ◽  
The Individual

For recognition of a target there must be some form of comparison process between the image of that target and a stored representation of that target. In the case of faces there must be a very large number of such stored representations, yet human beings seem able to perform comparisons at phenomenal speed. It is possible that faces are memorised by fitting unusual features or combinations of features onto a bland prototypical face, and such a data-compression technique would help to explain our computational speed. If humans do indeed function in this fashion, it is necessary to ask just what are the features that distinguish one face from another, and also, what are the features that form the basic set of the prototypical face. The distributed apertures technique was further developed in an attempt to answer both questions. Four target faces, stored in an image-processing computer, were each divided up into 162 contiguous squares that could be displayed in their correct positions in any combination of 24 or fewer squares. Each observer was required to judge which of the four target faces was displayed during a 1 s presentation, and the proportion of correct responses for each individual square was computed. The resultant response distributions, displayed as brightness maps, give a vivid impression of the relative saliency of each feature square, both for the individual targets and for all of them combined. The results, while broadly confirming previous work, contain some very interesting and surprising details about the differences between the target faces.

scholarly journals Cross-linguistic interactions across modalities: Effects of the oral language on sign production

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Marc Gimeno-Martínez ◽  
Andreas Mädebach ◽  
Cristina Baus
Keyword(s):  
Sign Language ◽  
Oral Language ◽  
Distractor Word ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Interference Task ◽  
Target Picture

Abstract To investigate cross-linguistic interactions in bimodal bilingual production, behavioural and electrophysiological measures (ERPs) were recorded from 24 deaf bimodal bilinguals while naming pictures in Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Two tasks were employed, a picture-word interference and a picture-picture interference task. Cross-linguistic effects were explored via distractors that were either semantically related to the target picture, to the phonology/orthography of the Spanish name of the target picture, or were unrelated. No semantic effects were observed in sign latencies, but ERPs differed between semantically related and unrelated distractors. For the form-related manipulation, a facilitation effect was observed both behaviourally and at the ERP level. Importantly, these effects were not influenced by the type of distractor (word/picture) presented providing the first piece of evidence that deaf bimodal bilinguals are sensitive to oral language in sign production. Implications for models of cross-linguistic interactions in bimodal bilinguals are discussed.

Noncontingent Nonreinforcement of a Response as the Aversive Event in a Cer Paradigm

1971 ◽  
Vol 29 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1196-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Calef ◽  
Richard A. Kaufman ◽  
Ronald N. Bone ◽  
Steven A. Werk
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Schedule ◽  
Present Experiment ◽  
High Density ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Aversive Event ◽  
Necessary Condition ◽  
Facilitation Effect ◽  
Response Facilitation ◽  
Early Training ◽  
Low Rate

The present experiment investigated the effects of noncontingent nonreinforcement as the aversive event in a CER paradigm. The results showed a significant response-facilitation effect during early training, but none during later training with a high rate-producing, high-density reinforcement schedule. The present results imply that a low rate-producing, high-density reinforcement schedule is not a necessary condition for response facilitation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document