scholarly journals Palmar plating of distal radius fractures : 3-year follow-up with titanium and PEEK plates give similar outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 521-527
Author(s):  
Josephine Berger-Groch ◽  
Ann-Christin Stodtmeister ◽  
Jan P. Petersen ◽  
Michael Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Polyether Ether Ketone ◽  
Type C ◽  
Randomised Controlled

A variety of different plate designs and materials are available to treat distal radius fractures. This study evaluates clinical results with a carbon fibre- reinforced (CFR)-polyether ether ketone (PEEK) plate in comparison to a standard titanium plate. Thirty-one distal radius fractures were included in this randomised controlled trial. Five fractures were classified as type A, 6 as type B and 20 as type C, in accordance with the AO classification. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups : 15 patients for titanium palmar plating (TPP) and 16 patients for PEEK palmar plating (PPP). Follow-up examinations were set at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 3 years postop. In terms of wrist range of motion, radiological evaluation (alignment and fracture healing), DASH score (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand), and VAS (visual analogue scale), no statistically significant differences were detected between the two groups, at all follow-up intervals. PEEK palmar plating and titanium plates give equivalent clinical and radiological outcomes up to 3 years follow-up.

scholarly journals Bone Loss in Distal Radial Fractures Treated with A Composite Xenohybrid Bone Substitute: A Two Years Follow-Up Retrospective Study

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4040
Author(s):  
Riccardo Ferracini ◽  
Alessandro Bistolfi ◽  
Claudio Guidotti ◽  
Stefano Artiaco ◽  
Agnese Battista ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Radius Fractures

(1) Background: Recently, surgical treatment of distal radius fractures has increased exponentially. Many locking plates’ fixation systems have been developed allowing a more stable reduction and early mobilization. Sometimes, open reduction and fixation of distal radius fractures may leave a residual bone loss requiring grafting. This retrospective study reports clinical and radiologic outcomes of distal radius fractures treated with xenohybrid bone grafting in order to assess (i) the safety of the investigated bone graft; (ii) its radiological integration and biomechanical performances, and (iii) clinical outcomes of the patients; (2) Methods: We performed a retrospective study on a cohort of 19 patients. Preoperative X-ray and CT scan were performed. The mean clinical and radiographical follow-up was two years. Safety of the xenohybrid bone graft was constantly evaluated. Clinical results were assessed through the DASH score and Mayo wrist score; (3) Results: No adverse reactions, infections, and local or general complication were related to the use of xenohybrid bone graft. The radiolucency of the xenografts suggested progressive osteointegration. No evidence of bone graft resorption was detected. All the patients reached consolidation with good to excellent clinical results; and (4) Conclusions: Clinical and radiological data demonstrated that xenohybrid bone grafting promotes new bone formation and healing in osteopenic areas caused by fracture reduction.

COMPARISON OF RADIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF INTERNAL FIXATION USING TWO DIFFERENT VOLAR PLATES FOR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES

Hand Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 357-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chul-Hyun Cho ◽  
Si-Wook Lee ◽  
Gu-Hee Jung
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Radial Length ◽  
Type C ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of volar plating using two different implants for distal radius fractures. Fifty-two patients with AO type C fractures were placed in either of two groups: the AO LDRS group (26 patients) or the Acu-Loc group (26 patients). Radiological parameters including radial length, radial inclination, volar tilt, and intra-articular step-off were significantly improved after surgery. The mean Mayo Wrist Performance Score was 84.6 in the AO LDRS group and 81.1 in the Acu-Loc group. The mean Subjective Wrist Value was 86.7% in the AO LDRS group and 86.3% in the Acu-Loc group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to both radiological and clinical outcomes at the final follow-up evaluation. Volar fixed-angle plating for unstable distal radius fractures had satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes. The difference of implant design did not influence overall final outcomes.

scholarly journals The treatment of distal radius fractures accompanying dorsally displaced free fragments beyond the watershed line with turning radius and distal volaris radius system plate fixation via the distal palmar approach

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaofeng Jia ◽  
Shijin Wang ◽  
Wei Jiang ◽  
Chuangli Li ◽  
Jiandong Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Palmar Approach

Abstract Background: Although distal radius fractures (DRFs) are clinically common, DRFs accompanied by dorsally displaced free fragments beyond the watershed line are much less so. At present, it is very difficult to fix and stabilize the displaced free fragments far away from the watershed line with a plate. Our aim was to investigate the clinical effect of DRFs with distally displaced dorsal free mass treated with distal volaris radius (DVR) combined with turning of the radius via the distal palmar approach. Methods: From 2015 to 2019, 25 patients with distal radius fractures associated with dorsally displaced free fragments beyond the watershed line were selected and treated with distal volaris radius (DVR) combined with turning of the radius via the distal palmar approach. This study involved 14 males and 11 females, with an average age of 34.5 years (ranging from 21 to 50 years). The mean follow-up period was 16.5 months (ranging from 12 to 22 months). The dorsal displacement of the free fragments was analyzed by X-ray and three-dimensional computed tomography, allowing characterization of postoperative recovery effects by radial height, volar tilt and radial inclination. For the follow-up, we evaluated effects of the surgery by analyzing range of motion (ROM); Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS); and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Postoperative wound recovery and complications were also monitored to evaluate the clinical therapeutic effects of the surgical procedures. Results: X-ray showed that all patients showed reduced fractures, well-healed wounds and recovered function with no obvious complications. Based on the follow-up, patients had a mean radial height of 10.5mm (ranging from 8.1 to 12.6 mm), mean MMWS of 78.8° (ranging from 61 to 90°), mean DASH score of 16.25 (ranging from 11 to 21), mean ROM for volar flexion of 76.5° (ranging from 62 to 81°), mean ROM for dorsiflexion of 77.1° (ranging from 59 to 83) and mean VAS score of 1.4 (ranging from 1 to 3). Conclusion: Treatment of distal radius fractures with accompanying dorsally displaced free fragments beyond the watershed line with turning of the radius and the DVR plate system via the distal palmar approach is effective and has no obvious complications.

PEEK radiolucent plate for distal radius fractures: multicentre clinical results at 12 months follow up

Injury ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S34-S38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Di Maggio ◽  
Pasquale Sessa ◽  
Patrizia Mantelli ◽  
Pietro Maniscalco ◽  
Fabrizio Rivera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures

Comparison of Forearm and Conventional Bier’s Blocks for Manipulation and Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. S. CHONG ◽  
D. M. K. TAN ◽  
B. S. OOI ◽  
M. MAHADEVAN ◽  
A. Y. T. LIM ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Hand Surgery ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Room Setting ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Bier Block

Forearm-based Bier’s block has been advocated as a useful anaesthesic technique in hand surgery. However, there is limited data comparing forearm blocks with the conventional Bier’s block. We conducted a randomised controlled trial ( n = 30) comparing the two techniques of anaesthesia for manipulation and reduction of closed distal radius fractures in an emergency room setting. Pain scores measured using the Visual Analogue Scale during the procedure were used as the primary outcome assessment. There was no significant difference in pain scores between the forearm and conventional Bier’s block (mean VAS 18.4 SD 22.10 versus 33.7 SD 29.6). No major complications were observed in either group. The forearm-based Bier block is an effective alternative to the conventional block.

scholarly journals The spanning plate as an internal fixator in complex distal radius fractures – a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Liechti ◽  
R Babst ◽  
U Hug ◽  
B -C Link ◽  
B van de Wall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
The United States ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Initial Operation ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Articular Fractures ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Objective Minimal invasive temporary spanning plate (SP) fixation of the wrist has been described as an alternative treatment method in complex distal radius fractures (DRFs). The purpose of this study is to conduct an outcome analysis of all consecutive DRFs treated by SP fixation representing the so far largest published patient cohort outside the United States. Methods Indication for SP fixation included DRFs with severe metaphyseal comminution, radiocarpal luxation fractures with concomitant ligamentous injuries and very distal intra-articular fractures lacking the possibility of adequate plate anchoring. All consecutive patients undergoing SP fixation of DRFs were prospectively included in a single level I trauma centre between 01/01/2018 and 31/12/2020. Post-operative assessments included radiological, functional and patient-rated outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Results In the mentioned timeframe, a total of 508 DRFs were treated operatively of which 28 underwent SP fixation. Average age was 58.1 years (range 22-95 years). The fracture type ranged from AO/OTA type B1.1 to C3.3 and included 8 fracture dislocations. SP removal was performed on average 3.7 months after the initial operation (range 1.4-6.5 months). The mean follow-up time was 14.5 months (range 12-24 months). Radiological evidence of fracture healing appeared on average 9.9 weeks (range 5-28 weeks) after the initial operation. One patient experienced oligosymptomatic non-union. Complications included 2 patients with tendon rupture and one patient with extensor tendon adhesions needing tenolysis at the time of plate removal leaving an overall complication rate of 12%. There was no implant failure and no infection. Mean satisfaction score was 8 (range 0-10) and mean visual analogue scale for resting pain was 0.9 (range 0-9). The mean PRWE score was 17.9 (range 0-59.5) and the mean DASH score was 16.6 (range 0-60.8). Grip strength averaged 23kg (range 4-74kg) amounting to 68% of the opposite side. Mean radial inclination, volar tilt and ulnar variance at 1 year were all within the acceptable limit predictive of symptomatic malunion. Conclusion The radiological, functional and patient-rated outcomes in this study are remarkably good considering the complexity of the included fractures. Therefore, this method represents a valuable alternative for the treatment of complex DRFs in selected patients.

scholarly journals Comparison of functional outcome of extra-articular distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plate versus percutaneous pinning in adults-a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 611
Author(s):  
Shushrut B. Bhavi ◽  
Amith Shanmukgouda Kallanagoudar ◽  
Deepak Kaladagi ◽  
N. B. Sanakal
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Locking Plate ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Volar Locking Plate ◽  
Percutaneous Pinning ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Plate Group

<p><strong>Background</strong>: Distal radius fractures are one of the most common fractures in an adult population and accounts for 17.5% of all the fractures. The management of distal radius fractures remains debatable despite the availability of different methods of treatment. The aim of this study is to assess the functional outcomes of extra-articular distal radius fractures treated with percutaneous pinning or internal fixation with volar locking plate in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study of 40 patients diagnosed with distal radius fracture with AO classification were treated either with percutaneous pinning (n=20) or open reduction and internal fixation with volar locking plate (n=20) were included in study. DASH score and radiographs at 6<sup>th</sup> month was assessed for functional outcome and radiological union.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age in plate group was 40 and 45 years in K wire group. The mean passive wrist ROM at the final follow-up evaluation in plate group was 63.8<sup>o</sup> extension and 70.5<sup>o </sup>flexion, 81.7<sup>o</sup> supination and 79<sup>o</sup> pronation, compared with 56.75<sup>o</sup> extension and 65.25<sup>o</sup> flexion, 74.7<sup>o</sup> supination and 85.5<sup>o</sup> pronation in patients treated with K wire group. Patients with plate group and K wire group had DASH score of 19.85 and 18.49 respectively (p=0.07) at 6 months follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The use of ORIF with plate resulted in stable fixation of the unstable extraarticular fractures, allowing early post-surgical wrist motion and has good radiological outcome whereas K wire also has advantages of being minimal invasive, reduced hospital stay and minimal cost.</p>

scholarly journals Complications of Radial Column Plating of the Distal Radius

Hand ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 614-619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel E. Galle ◽  
Neil G. Harness ◽  
Jacques H. Hacquebord ◽  
Raoul J. Burchette ◽  
Brett Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Outcomes Measures ◽  
Valuable Adjunct ◽  
Supplemental Fixation

Background: Distal radius fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation are commonly stabilized with a volar locking plate; however, more complex fracture patterns may require supplemental fixation with fragment-specific implants. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of distal radius fractures treated with radial column plates. Methods: A consecutive series of 61 patients who sustained distal radius fractures underwent radial column plating alone or in conjunction with other implants between August 2006 and January 2014. Thirty-one patients returned for follow-up or returned a mailed questionnaire at an average of 4.1 years. The outcomes measures included Visual Analog Scale (VAS); Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH); and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores. Results: Sixty-one patients with a mean age of 55 years (range, 20-87) met inclusion criteria and were available for follow-up or chart review at an average of 5.2 years (range, 1.6-9.0 years). Seventeen of 61 (28%) underwent radial column plate removal. Twenty patients returned for final follow-up examination, and 11 completed questionnaires via mail. Subjective scores included a mean postoperative VAS of 0.72, DASH score of 17.2, and PRWE score of 15.7. Hardware sensitivity and wrist stiffness were the most common complications at final follow-up. Conclusions: Radial column plating of the distal radius is a safe treatment modality and a valuable adjunct in the setting of complex distal radius fractures, but patients should be counseled that there is a 28% chance that hardware removal may be required. Our retrospective review found evidence of few complications and objective scores consistent with return to normal function.

Comparison of rehabilitation interventions in nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Tim Coughlin ◽  
Alan R. Norrish ◽  
Brigitte E. Scammell ◽  
Paul A. Matthews ◽  
Jessica Nightingale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Year

Aims Following cast removal for nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures, rehabilitation facilitated by advice leaflet and advice video were compared to a course of face-to-face therapy. Methods Adults with an isolated, nonoperatively treated distal radius fracture were included at six weeks post-cast removal. Participants were randomized to delivery of rehabilitation interventions in one of three ways: an advice leaflet; an advice video; or face-to-face therapy session(s). The primary outcome measure was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at six weeks post intervention and secondary outcome measures included DASH at one year, DASH work subscale, grip strength, and range of motion at six weeks and one year. Results A total of 116 (97%) of 120 enrolled participants commenced treatment. Of those, 21 were lost to follow-up, resulting in 30 participants in the advice leaflet, 32 in the advice video, and 33 face-to-face therapy arms, respectively at six weeks of follow-up. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the DASH at six weeks (advice leaflet vs face-to-face therapy, p = 0.69; advice video vs face-to-face therapy, p = 0.56; advice leaflet vs advice video, p = 0.37; advice leaflet vs advice video vs face-to-face therapy, p = 0.63). At six weeks, there were no differences in any secondary outcome measures except for the DASH work subscale, where face-to-face therapy conferred benefit over advice leaflet (p = 0.01). Conclusion Following cast removal for nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures, offering an advice leaflet or advice video for rehabilitation gives equivalent patient-reported outcomes to a course of face-to-face therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document