Comparison of Forearm and Conventional Bier’s Blocks for Manipulation and Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. S. CHONG ◽  
D. M. K. TAN ◽  
B. S. OOI ◽  
M. MAHADEVAN ◽  
A. Y. T. LIM ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Hand Surgery ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Room Setting ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Bier Block

Forearm-based Bier’s block has been advocated as a useful anaesthesic technique in hand surgery. However, there is limited data comparing forearm blocks with the conventional Bier’s block. We conducted a randomised controlled trial ( n = 30) comparing the two techniques of anaesthesia for manipulation and reduction of closed distal radius fractures in an emergency room setting. Pain scores measured using the Visual Analogue Scale during the procedure were used as the primary outcome assessment. There was no significant difference in pain scores between the forearm and conventional Bier’s block (mean VAS 18.4 SD 22.10 versus 33.7 SD 29.6). No major complications were observed in either group. The forearm-based Bier block is an effective alternative to the conventional block.

scholarly journals Palmar plating of distal radius fractures : 3-year follow-up with titanium and PEEK plates give similar outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 521-527
Author(s):  
Josephine Berger-Groch ◽  
Ann-Christin Stodtmeister ◽  
Jan P. Petersen ◽  
Michael Hoffmann
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Polyether Ether Ketone ◽  
Type C ◽  
Randomised Controlled

A variety of different plate designs and materials are available to treat distal radius fractures. This study evaluates clinical results with a carbon fibre- reinforced (CFR)-polyether ether ketone (PEEK) plate in comparison to a standard titanium plate. Thirty-one distal radius fractures were included in this randomised controlled trial. Five fractures were classified as type A, 6 as type B and 20 as type C, in accordance with the AO classification. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups : 15 patients for titanium palmar plating (TPP) and 16 patients for PEEK palmar plating (PPP). Follow-up examinations were set at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 3 years postop. In terms of wrist range of motion, radiological evaluation (alignment and fracture healing), DASH score (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand), and VAS (visual analogue scale), no statistically significant differences were detected between the two groups, at all follow-up intervals. PEEK palmar plating and titanium plates give equivalent clinical and radiological outcomes up to 3 years follow-up.

scholarly journals A randomized controlled trial on Aspirin and complex regional pain syndrome after radius fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-209
Author(s):  
Amir Sobhani Eraghi ◽  
Amir Khazanchin ◽  
Nima Hosseinzadeh ◽  
Alireza Pahlevansabagh
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Aspirin Group

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is often diagnosed in patients who are recovered with surgery or injury. CRPS is usually diagnosed in patients recovering from distal radius fractures. The aim of study was the effects of aspirin in prevention of the complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) following a fracture of distal radius. In a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 91 patients with unilateral extra-articular distal radius fractures were randomly allocated to receive either placebo (PLA) or 500 mg of aspirin (ASA) daily for 7 days. The effect of aspirin on the occurrence of CRPS was evaluated. The patients were assessed clinically and radiographically in the second, fourth and twelfth weeks by a physician who was unaware of the treatment allocation. Ninety-one patients (ASA, n=44; PLA, n=47) were enrolled in the study. The prevalence of CRPS in all patients was 16.5%. The prevalence of CRPS in the aspirin group was lower (13.6%) than the placebo group (19.1%), but this difference was not statistically significant. The only significant difference was the lower rate of regional osteoporosis seen in the radiographs of aspirin group. Mean age was significantly higher in the patients with CRPS. Also, comminuted distal radius fractures (A3-type) were significantly more common in the patients with CRPS. Administration of aspirin in patients with a distal radius fracture was associated with a lower incidence of CRPS, but, not statistically significant. Further investigations needs to be done with a larger sample size, longer follow-up period and multi-center design.

scholarly journals Surgical treatment is not cost-effective compared to nonoperative treatment for displaced distal radius fractures in patients 65 years and over

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 1027-1034
Author(s):  
Sondre Hassellund ◽  
Zinajda Zolic-Karlsson ◽  
John Håkon Williksen ◽  
Torstein Husby ◽  
Jan Erik Madsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Life Years

Aims The purpose was to compare operative treatment with a volar plate and nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in patients aged 65 years and over in a cost-effectiveness analysis. Methods A cost-utility analysis was performed alongside a randomized controlled trial. A total of 50 patients were randomized to each group. We prospectively collected data on resource use during the first year post-fracture, and estimated costs of initial treatment, further operations, physiotherapy, home nursing, and production loss. Health-related quality of life was based on the Euro-QoL five-dimension, five-level (EQ-5D-5L) utility index, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated. Results The mean QALYs were 0.05 higher in the operative group during the first 12 months (p = 0.260). The healthcare provider costs were €1,533 higher per patient in the operative group: €3,589 in the operative group and 2,056 in the nonoperative group. With a suggested willingness to pay of €27,500 per QALY there was a 45% chance for operative treatment to be cost-effective. For both groups, the main costs were related to the primary treatment. The primary surgery was the main driver of the difference between the groups. The costs related to loss of production were high in both groups, despite high rates of retirement. Retirement rate was unevenly distributed between the groups and was not included in the analysis. Conclusion Surgical treatment was not cost-effective in patients aged 65 years and older compared to nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in a healthcare perspective. Costs related to loss of production might change this in the future if the retirement age increases. Level of evidence: II Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(12):1027–1034.

Clinical Outcomes in Distal Radius Fractures Accompanied by Volar Lunate Facet Fragments: A Comparison between Dorsal and Volar Displaced Fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 417-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Obata ◽  
Kiyohito Naito ◽  
Ayaka Kaneko ◽  
Keniji Goto ◽  
Yoichi Sugiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Fragment Size ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Postoperative Outcome ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Bone Fragment ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The treatment strategy for distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment is controversial. In most cases, only the bone fragment size was discussed and a plate for distal placement is selected due to the accompanying volar lunate facet fragment regardless of the direction of bone fragment displacement. In this study, we divided distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment into dorsal and volar displaced fractures, and treated these surgically based on different treatment strategies. Methods: The subjects were 25 patients with distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment treated by reduction and fixation using a volar locking plate (VLP) (male: 14, female: 11, mean age: 57.8 years old). A proximal VLP (PVLP) was selected for 13 dorsal displaced fractures and a distal VLP (DVLP) was selected for 12 volar displaced fractures. The range of motion, VAS, Q-DASH, and Mayo score were evaluated at 12 months after surgery, and compared. Results: No significant difference due to the difference in the direction of displacement was noted in the range of motion, VAS, Q-DASH, or Mayo score at 12 months after surgery and there were no perioperative complications. In addition, no re-displacement of volar lunate facet fragment was noted after surgery in any patient and bone fusion was observed. Conclusions: Reduction and fixation with a PVLP are possible even for dorsal displaced distal radius fractures accompanied by volar lunate facet fragment. For the volar displaced distal radius fractures, a favorable postoperative outcome is possible by applying a DVLP to the distal ulnar.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document