Processes of Reclaiming Rubber and Their Relative Merits
Abstract 1. A more complete reclamation is possible by the thermal and pan process than with the alkali process, and both the former effect a saving in time. 2. The thermal process calls for a higher temperature, but the after-treatment consumes less power for grinding. The pan process makes use of a lower temperature; but the expenditure of more power for grinding before and after treatment, as well as a drying period, are entailed. 3. The new products are neutral, and softer than alkali reclaim. 4. Accelerated with BA, stocks with these new types of reclaim give poor results. On the other hand, MBT offers good prospects, both for aging and acceleration. 5. Whether refined or not, the pan reclaim produced a tensile strength 95 per cent of alkali reclaim, and the thermal reclaim 80 per cent, in MBT stocks. 6. With modified acceleration, thermal reclaim stock can be made to give improved tensile properties. 7. Laboratory abrasion resistance of both new types was superior to the standard, the losses being 92 per cent and 74 per cent for thermal and pan reclaims, respectively. 8. The permanent set was lower despite the softener in the pan reclaim. 9. Despite the lack of refining, articles formed by extrusion from stocks containing thermal and pan reclaims compared favorably with those from alkali reclaim with regard to surface finish. 10. Thermal reclaim ages extremely well. Independent workers in the field of thermal reclaim have been able to exercise a finer control of the process, and a large scale plant is in course of erection as a result of the improvements effected. Further work is proceeding, and it is hoped that a product superior in all respects to alkali reclaim will be obtained.