Helical Spring Stress Relaxometer
Abstract Changes in the tensile properties of rubber are obviously of great practical importance. Consequently, measurements of the change in force required to maintain or produce a given extension under controlled conditions of temperature and atmosphere have frequently been made and have advanced our understanding of the physical process of crystallization and of the chemical reactions responsible for thermal aging to the extent that they may become routine test procedures. The decrease in the force required to maintain a constant extension during the period of aging (stress relaxation) has been the most common measurement, in part because rubber elasticity theory predicts an equality between the fractional decrease in force and the fraction of the network chains originally supporting the stress which have become ineffective. Stress-relaxation behavior may characterize the type of scission reaction occurring; for example, the stress relaxation of most vulcanizates can be interpreted as a first-order scission of crosslinks, and not as a random scission of monomeric units in the chains between crosslinks. Stress-relaxation results, however, do not provide all the necessary information on network changes—the final properties of the rubber depend not only on crosslink or chain scission but to a comparable degree on crosslink formation during aging, which does not affect the force at constant extension. To examine this second effect requires measurements on the intermittent stretching of an unstrained sample to a constant extension. Parallel measurements of force at constant and intermittent extension under identical aging conditions are therefore required. The several designs of apparatus already described have usually been rather complicated and require practice and skill in use. A simple apparatus developed in these laboratories, which can readily be used for routine operations, is described in the following paragraphs. The fractional change in force is read directly from a vernier scale on the instrument, and may be immediately plotted on a force-time graph, preferably as log10 (force/forcet=0) vs. time (cf. Reference 3).