scholarly journals Management of the Natural Attractions in the Area Simarjarunjung Simalungun North Sumatra Province

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 450-462
Author(s):  
Rinal Kusnadi

Nature is the utilization of natural resources and environmental governance has been defined as the object of tourist attraction and to be made the target of tourism potential. The natural potential in Indonesia is very diverse, one of which is the potential of Nature Tourism in North Sumatra. Natural potential that is being developed is only one Nature in The Simarjarunjung. This study aims to determine how the institutional management of the Natural Attractions in the Area Simarjarunjung Simalungun Regency and utilization of natural resources on the activities of the Nature in The Simarjarunjung Simalungun. This research method is qualitative using institutional theory has aspects of that structure, shape and norms. The utilization of natural resources using the theory states there are four aspects, namely, the common property, state property, private property and the common property. The result of this research is the institutional management of the Natural Attractions in The Simarjarunjung have the management of the Combined Forest Farmer Group and the Group Aware of Its Loyal Both as a driver and manager. Natural attractions in The Simarjarunjung managed group and personal with having the structure of the management. Natural resources in the Region's Nature Simarjarunjung have natural resources that is different such is the charm of nature, the mountains, the pine stands, agro-forestry plants and microclimate. The utilization of these natural resources will continue to be managed to improve the local economy. Keywords: Nature, Simarjarunjung, Institutional Management, Natural Resources.

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Rodgers

AbstractThis article argues that public property rights should be recognised as a separate category of property interest, different and distinct from private and common property interests and conferring distinctive rights and obligations on both “owners” and members of the public. It develops a taxonomy to differentiate private, public and common property rights. The article concludes that it is a mistake to think in terms of “private property”, “common property” or “public property”. The division and allocation of resource entitlements in land can result in private, common and public property rights subsisting over the same land simultaneously, in different combinations and at different times. The categorisation of property interests in land (as private, common or public) may also shift and change from time to time. The article considers the importance of distinguishing between private, common and public property interests for developing new strategies for environmental governance, and for implementing the effective protection of natural resources.


2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Paletto ◽  
Isabella De Meo ◽  
Fabrizio Ferretti

Abstract The property rights and the type of ownership (private owners, public domain and commons) are two fundamental concepts in relationship to the local development and to the social and environmental sustainability. Common forests were established in Europe since the Middle Ages, but over the centuries the importance of commons changed in parallel with economic and social changes. In recent decades, the scientific debate focused on the forest management efficiency and sustainability of this type of ownership in comparison to the public and private property. In Italy common forests have a long tradition with substantial differences in the result of historical evolution in various regions. In Sardinia region the private forests are 377.297 ha, the public forests are 201.324 ha, while around 120.000 ha are commons. The respect of the common rights changed in the different historical periods. Today, the common lands are managed directly by municipalities or indirectly through third parties, in both cases the involvement of members of community is very low. The main objective of the paper is to analyse forest management differences in public institutions with and without common property rights. To achieve the objective of the research the forest management preferences of community members and managers were evaluated and compared. The analysis was realized through the use of the principal-agent model and it has been tested in a case study in Sardinia region (Arci-Grighine district). The analysis of the results showed that the categories of actors considered (members of community, municipalities and managers) have a marked productive profile, but municipalities manage forests perceiving a moderate multifunctionality. Moreover, the representatives of the municipalities pay more attention to the interests of the collectivity in comparison to the external managers. They also attribute high importance to environmental and social forest functions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Riswandha Risang Aji

ABSTRAK Pariwisata alam merupakan pariwisata yang memiliki banyak potensi di Indonesia. Perkembangan pariwisata diselaraskan dengan pembangunan berkelanjutan yang berfokus pada ekonomi, sosial, dan lingkungan. Di Indonesia sendiri sudah banyak yang mengintegrasikan pariwisata dengan lingkungan melalui konsep ekowisata, di mana pariwisata berkembang tanpa merusak lingkungan sehingga kegiatan pariwisata tersebut berkelanjutan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengkaji pengembangan pariwisata alam yang bisa mendukung dan selaras dengan pembangunan berkelanjutan. Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah di desa wisata Pentingsari terdapat pemanfaatan sumber daya alam untuk dikembangkan sebagai atraksi pariwisata. Selain itu desa wisata Pentingsari juga memiliki sistem sosial yang unik dan bisa menjadi atraksi pariwisata juga. Desa wisata Pentingsari sangat menjaga keberlanjutan lingkungannya melalui sistem sosial yang memanfaatkan sumber daya alam secara proporsional dan menjaga kelestarian sumber daya alam yang ada di sana. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah desa wisata Pentingsari mampu mengembangkan pariwisata alam sebagai atraksi pariwisata yang mendukung pembangunan berkelanjutan berwawasan lingkungan melalui integrasi aspek-aspek pembangunan berkelanjutan seperti ekonomi, sosial, dan lingkungan. Kata kunci: Desa Wisata, Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, Pariwisata Alam ABSTRACT Indonesia has a lot of nature tourism potential. The development of tourism is aligned with sustainable development that focused on the economy, social and environment. In Indonesia itself, most of the tourism had integrated with the environment through the concept of ecotourism, where tourism develops without damaging the environment so that tourism activities are sustainable. The purpose of this study is to examine the development of nature tourism that can support and be aligned with sustainable development. The findings of this study are that in the Pentingsari tourism village there are natural resources which utilised to be developed as tourism attractions. In additions Pentingsari tourism village also has a unique social system and can be a tourism attraction as well. Pentingsari tourism village maintain its environmental sustainability through a social system that utilises natural resources proportionally and preserves the natural resources there. The conclusion of this research is Pentingsari tourism village is able to develop nature tourism as a tourism attraction that supports environmentally sustainable development through sustainable development aspects such as economic, social, and environment. Keywords: Tourism village, sustainable development, nature touris


2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 7-18
Author(s):  
Dariusz Grzybek ◽  

This article analyses the implications from modern economic theory on political philosophy. As economic growth seems the main fact of economic life, so progress of science is a key factor of economic growth in the long perspective. Scientific knowledge analyzed by economic terms appears as a kind of public good. This statement was tested against Lockeian property theory, fundamental for modern liberalism. According to Lockeian arguments, private property is a consequence of human self-ownership. If humans are the owners of their bodies, the fruits of their labor are thus legimatized property for them. Nature is indispensable in production; however we could consider them as God’s Gift. According to Locke’s theory, natural resources are the common property of all humankind, unless the people choose agriculture and animal husbandry. As we consider all natural resources to be God’s Gift, we could see them as the property of the whole human race. This indicates a claim for the egalitarian distribution of social income. This reasoning is an Old Lockeian Argument for Socialism. The New Argument is based on the assumption that scientific knowledge is the key resource used in the process of production and that knowledge is a free gift for humanity from the community of scientists. Using the terminology of economics, scientific knowledge takes the form of public good. Therefore, as science is the main factor in technological progress and economic growth, their fruits should be distributed among all people in an egalitarian mode.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Marie Baland ◽  
Kjetil Bjorvatn

AbstractThe establishment of a private property regime is often proposed as a solution to the degradation of natural resources. While arguably more efficient than open access, private property often comes at a distributional cost (Weitzman, M. (1974), ‘Free access vs private ownership as alternative systems for managing common property’, Journal of Economic Theory 8(2): 225–234) as traditional users of the resource lose income and employment in the process. The present paper demonstrates that, in the case of renewable resources, traditional users may gain from privatization even if they are denied ownership of the resource. Indeed, a private owner maximizing profits tends to preserve the resource, which results in long-term increases in employment. We derive the conditions under which these long-term gains more than compensate traditional users for the short-run fall in labor demand and resource rents.


2000 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Steinvorth

AbstractI agree with Van Parijs that a theory of justice must meet the condition of indicating institutions that eliminate compulsory unemployment, but argue that his basic income is another form of unemployment compensation with all the disadvantages such compensations suffer from. In particular, it does not advance real freedom, but is liable to contribute to narrow political ends. I indicate an alternative and explicate, since Van Parijs disregards it, the right to work and its basis in the common property of natural resources. Finally, I compare the two competing conceptions of a good life that underlie his recommendation of a basic income and my rejection of it.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 155
Author(s):  
Dinov Sambadi Adistria Laksana ◽  
I Nyoman Sukma Arida

Tourism is the largest and fastest growing industry in the world. Tourism in one of the most important sector and has a significant influences in the economic development of the country. Tourism contribution is considered important for economic growth in Indonesia, because in addition to bring in foreign exchange, also felt able to open a new job for the community. Tourim in Bali has developed quite rapidly, tourism potentials in Bali has been developed well enough, so that it can be enjoyed by tourists, which became a leading tourist attraction in Bali that is nature tourism and cultural tourism. This research focuses on the planning and strategy of the packaging of heritage tourism products in Kerta Tourism Village in order to improve the local economy, considering that Kerta Tourism Village has so many heritage tourism potential that has not been developed yet. This research is expected to benefit local communities and Gianyar Government in adding data, as preliminary data, and consideration data for further in-depth research. This research has a scope that is limited to two variables, that is identifying the heritage tourism potential owned by Kerta Tourism Village and compile a strategy to package heritage tiourism in Kerta Tourism Village. The data sources used are primary data obtained from interviews with the informants, observations, and documentation in Kerta Tourim Village, and the secondary data is obtained from various books used as the theoretical basis to supporting the research. Based on the results obtained, in Kerta Tourism Village there are many tourism potentials that can be developed into a tourism attraction, one of which is heritage tourism that can be combined with cycling tourism activities and certainly useful for local people and tourists. Keywords: Heritage Tourism, Cycling Tourism, Kerta Tourism Village.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Faiq Tobroni ◽  
Izzatin Kamala

This paper aims to explore the new concept as an alternative management of natural resources (specifically Coastal Areas and Small Islands/CA-SI). In Decision Number 3/PUU-VIII/2010 (the Court Decision), the Constitutional Court uses the new concept as considerations to cancel the Concession Rights on Coastal Waters (CR-CW) as the mechanism of management of CA-SI in Law Number 27 Year 2007 about Management of Coastal Area and Small Islands (Law 27/2007). Some important questions in this paper are why did the Constitutional Court annul CR-CW in Law 27/2007? Whether the new concept offered in the Court Decision and consistent with 1945 Constitution? And how is the new concept offered consistent with people empowerment?The revoke of CR-CW in Law 27/2007 is caused that the concept of concession is contrary to the norms of natural resources management in the 1945 Constitution and the spirit of people empowerment. The new concept offered in the Decision is the common access. In this concept of access, CA-SI is   regarded as the common property with the rules from members of the community itself. The provisions to access CA-SI  as  the common  property are also determined by agreements of the community itself. Management of CA-SI on the common access is in accordance with people empowerment. The consistency is shown by the relevancy of concept of common access to include three key issues of people empowerment (access, assets and collective  capabilities).


Daímon ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 113-127
Author(s):  
Jean-Fabien Spitz

Nacido en 1790 y fallecido en 1932 víctima de la pandemia de cólera, Thomas Skidmore es uno de los principales representantes del agrarismo en los Estados Unidos de la primera mitad del siglo XIX. Inspirado por las ideas desarrolladas por Thomas Paine en Agrarian Justice, en 1829 publicó el libro The rights of Man to property en el que desarrolla las consecuencias de la idea según la cual, siendo el mundo una propiedad común de todos los hombres, cada uno tiene un derecho imprescriptible a una parte igual de los recursos naturales. Entre estas consecuencias figura la tesis de que este derecho hace imposible todo derecho a testar, pues tal derecho haría de todo punto imposible que cada nuevo individuo incorporado tuviera acceso a la justa parte de propiedad a la que tendría derecho. Skidmore elabora así una teoría precisa acerca de las razones por las que el testador, tras su muerte, no puede tener derecho alguno sobre los bienes de los que fue propietario en vida. Born in 1790 and victim of the cholera pandemics in 1832, Thomas Skidmore is one of the main representatives of agrarianism in the United states during the first half of the XIXth century. Inspired by the principles Thomas Paine had put forth in Agrarian justice, Skidmore publishes in 1829 a book entitled The rights of man to property in which he states the consequences of the idea that, the world being the common property of all men, every individual has an imprescriptible right to an equal share of natural resources. Among those consequences is the claim that such a principle makes any right of bequest and inheritance absolutely impossible, since such a right would make it impossible that each new individual arriving in the world has an effective right of access to the just share of property he is entitled to. Skidmore builds in consequence a precise explanation of the reasons why the testator, after his death, can no longer have any right over the properties he owned during his lifetime.


Author(s):  
Charles Perrings ◽  
Ann Kinzig

This book explores the process by which people decide to conserve or convert natural resources. Building on a seminal study by Harold Hotelling that connects conservation to expected changes in the value of resources, the authors develop the general principles involved in conservation science. The focus of the book is the resources of the natural environment. This includes both directly exploited resources such as agricultural soils, minerals, forests, and fish stocks, and biodiversity—the wild species and natural ecosystems put at risk when people choose to convert natural habitat, or to discharge waste products to water, land, or air. The theory of conservation shows how much or how little to extract from the environment, and how much to leave intact. It also shows how conservation decisions are influenced by the existence of market failures—the external impacts of market decisions on ecosystems, and the public good nature of many ecosystem services. It shows how conservation connects to expected changes in the relative importance or value of natural resources, and what is needed to uncover that value. It shows how context matters. Decisions about the conservation of natural resources are influenced by property rights—whether land is private property or in the public domain; by environmental policies, laws, and regulations within countries; and by environmental agreements between countries. Finally, this book shows how conservation differs within and beyond protected areas, how it connects to the system of environmental governance, and how governance structures have evolved over time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document