scholarly journals Legal Protection on the Moral Rights and Economic Rights of the Author of Film Script Writing Pursuant to Law No. 28 of 2014 Concerning Copyright (Analysis of Copyright Infringement Case by a Production House of the “ Benyamin Biang Kerok” Film)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 731-739
Author(s):  
Asima Trismawati Situmeang ◽  
Saidin . ◽  
T. Keizerina Devi A
Keyword(s):  
Film Industry ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Creative Industries ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Original Manuscript ◽  
Production House ◽  
Film Scripts ◽  
Article 5

Moral Rights and Economic Rights are Exclusive Rights that cannot be separated in relation to Copyrights. Copyright protects all forms of work, one of which is Film Script Writing as referred to in Article 40 paragraph (1) of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright (UUHC). One of the forms of infringement on the copyrighted work of the film script is the reuse of the film script without the permission of the creator, resulting in the loss of the moral rights and economic rights of the creator. The problems in this study are: how to use the principles of Moral Rights and Economic Rights of the Author in claiming protection against Copyright infringement on Film Script Writing, how legal remedies can be taken in the form of legal protection for the Author of Film Script Writing used without permission, and how analysis of the Judge's decision on the violation of Moral Rights for the Creator in the dispute of the film "Benyamin Biang Kerok" based on the decision of the Panel of Judges Number 09/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Cipta/2018/PN Niaga Jkt. Pst. This research is descriptive analytical with a normative juridical approach. Qualitative analysis methods are used to process and analyze research data and then draw conclusions using deductive methods through a normative framework. The results of the research show: the use of the Principles of Moral Rights and Economic Rights of the Creator as a claim for infringement of Copyright is listed in Article 4, Article 5. This right will continue to exist and is eternally attached to the Creator and will continue to apply indefinitely. Legal efforts as a form of legal protection for Film Scripts that are used without permission are to follow the provisions in Article 95 to Article 109 of the UUHC, namely by preventing violations from occurring and through alternative dispute resolution through arbitration or through the Commercial Court. The Plaintiff's lawsuit was declared defeated by the Panel of Judges, due to lack of parties. But the production of the film "Benyamin Biang Kerok" is not determined as a violation of the exclusive rights of the Creator. This decision has not provided justice and provided legal protection for the Plaintiff as the author of the original manuscript and it is feared that the same violation will continue to occur in the future. Suggestions that can be given include: in providing explanations and strengthening the importance of the Creator's Exclusive Rights, it is necessary to have awareness, socialization and public education so as not to use other people's creations carelessly. Legal efforts to prevent infringement of film script writing is to conduct socialization in the film industry and other related creative industries. Against a decision that has not provided legal protection for the Plaintiff, the Panel of Judges must also determine that the defendant has violated the exclusive rights of the Plaintiff's written film script and stipulates compensation for the violation of exclusive rights committed. Keywords: Legal Protection, Moral Rights, Economic Rights, The Author, Copyrights,Film Script Writing.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Hak Cipta Terhadap Karya Tulis Pada Media Internet

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bias Lintang Dialog
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Internet Users ◽  
Internet Media ◽  
The Law

The cases of Copyright infringement in the form of plagiarism is done on the internet at the current often take place between them on social media, blogs and websites done by academics and non-academics by internet users. Copyright infringement is very harmful form of plagiarism is certainly given to copyright are moral rights and economic rights that need to be protected, and should receive protection. This study was conducted to examine and analyze the legal protection of the papers on the internet media if the legal consequences of copyright infringement against papers on the internet media and remedies that can be done if the creators of written works was plagiated by others . In order to achieve the objectives and obtain the data, this research using normative juridical approach qualitatively using secondary data in the form of legislation , legal documents and other legal materials. The results of this study stated that the papers found on the internet is protected by Article 12 of the Law of Copyright and reinforced by Article 25 of the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions . If plagiarism is used by a person or a group of academics then used Minister of Education Regulation  No. 40 of 2010 regarding the prevention of plagiarism . Due to the law of copyright infringement can be a claim for damages , fines and or imprisonment in accordance with the rules of the Copyright Act and, where academics will be subject to administrative sanctions and when done in social media it will be socially sanctioned . Legal remedies that can be done by the creators of the paper when his rights are violated can be through settlement through litigation and non-litigation in accordance with the rules of the Copyright Act . Keywords : Protection Law , Papers , Media Internet

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK CIPTA TERHADAP LOGO INSTANSI PEMERINTAH DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PRINSIP ALTER EGO

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-114
Author(s):  
Mahadiena Fatmashara ◽  
Muhamad Amirulloh ◽  
Laina Rafianti
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
The Other ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Natural Right ◽  
Commercial Activities ◽  
The Government ◽  
Alter Ego

ABSTRAKSalah satu instansi pemerintah di Jawa Barat, menggunakan logo yang diciptakan oleh pegawai dari instansi tersebut. Pembuatan logo tidak diperjanjikan khusus, sehingga pencipta tidak mendapatkan royalti (materiil dan ekonomi). Hal tersebut menarik untuk dikaji mengenai Implementasi Prinsip Alter ego yang berkaitan pada hak cipta seseorang yang mengakui pencipta sebagai pemilik hak tertinggi. Pencipta memiliki hak alamiah untuk memanfaatkan ciptaannya dan mempertahankan ciptaannya terhadap gangguan apapun dari pihak lain. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini bersifat deskriptif analitis guna memperoleh gambaran peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dikaitkan dengan teori-teori hukum dan praktek pelaksanaan hukum positif. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif, dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka yang disebut data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, literatur-literatur, artikel-artikel, pendapat dan ajaran para ahli serta implementasinya dalam praktek. Apabila dilihat pada Pasal 35 ayat (1) dan (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta tidak terpenuhi. Meskipun instansi pemerintah tidak bertujuan untuk kegiatan komersial. Namun hak moral dan hak ekonomi hakikatnya wajib dilaksanakan sesuai dengan prinsip perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Perlindungan Hukum terhadap pencipta atas logo tetap harus diakui. Kata kunci: alter ego; hak cipta; hak moral; logo; instansi pemerintah. ABSTRACTOne of the government agencies in West Java, using a logo created by employees of the agency. Logo creation is not specifically promised, so creators do not get royalties (material and economic). It is interesting to review the Implementation of Alter ego Principles relating to the copyright of a person who recognizes the creator as the owner of the highest right. The Creator has the natural right to utilize his creation and defend his creation against any interference from the other party.The research methods used in this writing are analytically descriptive to obtain an overview of the prevailing laws and regulations associated with legal theories and the practice of implementing positive laws. The approach used in this study is normative juridical, by examining library materials called secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, literature, articles, opinions, and teachings of experts and their implementation in practice.If viewed in Article 35 paragraph (1) and (2) of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright is not fulfilled. Although government agencies do not aim for commercial activities. But moral rights and economic rights must essentially be implemented in accordance with the principles of intellectual property protection. Legal protection of creators over logos must still be recognized.Keywords: alter ego; copyright; government agencies; logo; moral rights.

scholarly journals Legal Protection of Brand Rights Holders for Brands Counterfeiting in E-Commerce in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
Gede Angga Prawirayuda ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Domain Names ◽  
The World ◽  
The Government ◽  
Internet Networks

The most detrimental thing is the use of domain names on internet networks that often use company name, brand and services without permission from the brand owner. The position of the brand is very important in the world of advertising and marketing. That happens because consumers in choosing a product related to the reputation of a brand, based on a sense of trust in the experience in using products with that brand. Aside from being a differentiator of a product with other products, a brand is also a valuable and commercial asset that has moral rights and economic rights. This study aims to analyse the preventive and repressive legal protection of trademark rights holders in e-commerce transactions. This research was conducted using the normative legal research method. The results of this study indicate that the preventive legal protection of trademark rights holders in e-commerce transactions is to register the trademark. The emphasis on preventive protection in this research is related to guarantees of the exercise of rights for brand rights holders in e-commerce transactions. That the presence of the government by drafting the Electronic Commerce Act and conducting socialization related to the legal protection of the parties in e-commerce is expected to be able to provide legal certainty of legal protection. Repressive legal protection in resolving trademark disputes is expected to create a guarantee for the enforcement of the rights of registered trademark rights holders in e-commerce transactions. Settlement of trademark disputes in e-commerce transactions can be done in 2 (two) ways, namely litigation and non-litigation.

scholarly journals BENTUK PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMEGANG HAK TERKAIT (NEIGHBOURING RIGHTS)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-35
Author(s):  
Zulvia Makka
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Legal Issue ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Law ◽  
Neighbouring Rights ◽  
Scope Of Protection

ABSTRAKHak terkait adalah hak yang berkaitan dengan hak cipta yang merupakan hak ekslusif bagi pelaku pertunjukan, producer fonogram, atau lembaga penyiaran. Berdasarkan pengertian hak terkait tersebut maka dapat dipahami bahwa yang merupakan pemilik hak terkait adalah pelaku pertunjukan, produser fonogram (lebih dikenal sebagai produser rekaman), dan lembaga penyiaran. Perlu adanya perlindungan untuk pelaku karena pelaku pertunjukan memiliki hak moral dan hak ekonomi yang terdapat pada pasal 23 UUHC. Yang memuat pada pelaku pertunjukan yang tidak dapat dihilang atau tidak dapat dihapus dengan alasan apapun. Namun pada prakteknya seringkali hak terkait ini dikesampingkan, karena lingkup perlindungan tidak hanya mencakup hak ekonomi dan hak moral. Permasalahan diatas menimbulkan isi hukum bentuk perlindungan terhadap hak terkait menurut undang-undang Hak Cipta dan perolehan Hak Terkait dalam Hak Cipta Isu hukum ini diteliti dengan menggunakan metode dengan tipe penelitian Normatif.Bentuk pelindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Terkait menurut Undang-Undang Hak Cipta terdiri dari 2 (dua) yaitu, perlindungn hukum preventif dan perlindungan hukum represif. Perolehan hak terkait dalam UUHC yaitu hak moral dan hak ekonomis. Hak moral pelaku pertunjukan merupakan hak yang melekat pada pelaku pertunjukan yang tidak dapat dihilangkan atau tidak dapat dihapus dengan alasan apapun walaupun hak terkait telah dialihkan. Hak Ekonomi Pelaku Pertunjukan adalah suatu hak yang diberikan oleh Undang-undang secara eksklusif kepada Pencipta untuk untuk memanfaatkan keuntungan suatu ciptaan yang biasanya berupa publikasi suatu salinan ciptaan atau fonogram supaya dapat tersedia untuk publik dalam jumlah tertentu. Kata Kunci : Perlindungan, Hak Terkait, Hak Moral, Hak Ekonomi  AbstractRelated rights are rights relating to copyright which are exclusive rights for performers, producer phonograms, or broadcasters. Based on the understanding of related rights, it can be understood that those who are related rights holders are performers, phonogram producers (better known as record producers), and broadcasting institutions. There needs to be protection for the perpetrators because the performers have the moral rights and economic rights contained in article 23 of UUHC. Which includes the performers who cannot be lost or cannot be removed for any reason. But in practice often these related rights are ruled out, because the scope of protection does not only cover economic rights and moral rights. The above issues give rise to the contents of the law in the form of protection of related rights according to the Copyright law and the acquisition of Related Rights in Copyright This legal issue is examined using methods with normative research types.The form of legal protection against Related Rights according to the Copyright Act consists of 2 (two), namely, preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. The acquisition of related rights in the UUHC is moral rights and economic rights. The moral rights of performers are the rights inherent in the performers who cannot be removed or cannot be removed for any reason even though the related rights have been transferred. The Economic Rights of Performers is a right granted by the Law exclusively to the Creator to utilize the benefits of a work which is usually in the form of the publication of a copy of a work or phonogram so that it can be available to the public in a certain amount. Keywords: Protection, Related Rights, Moral Rights, Economic Rights

scholarly journals PENGATURAN PERLINDUNGAN HAK CIPTA PERMAINAN VIDEO

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1129
Author(s):  
Nusan Indah Permata Sari ◽  
Anak Agung Gede Agung Dharma Kusuma
Keyword(s):  
Video Games ◽  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Know How ◽  
Commercial Activities ◽  
Copyright Laws

Tujuan penulisan jurnal ilmiah ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaturan permainan video dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta dan mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan hukum hak cipta terhadap pelanggaran permainan video. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kekaburan norma pada Undang-Undang Hak Cipta yaitu pada ketentuan pasal 40 ayat (1) huruf r “permainan video”. Kekaburan norma ini terlihat jelas karena tidak adanya penjelasan lebih lanjut terkait dengan pengertian permainan video serta pengklasifikasiannya. Selain itu terlihat jelas pula bahwa terdapat kekosongan norma terkait dengan sanksi bagi pelanggar hak moral pencipta yang tidak dilakukan tidak untuk kegiatan komersiil. Selanjutnya kesimpulan kedua bahwa permainan video merupakan salah satu objek dari suatu ciptaan yang dilindungi oleh Undang-Undang Hak Cipta yang perlindungannya berlaku selama 50 tahun sejak permainan video tersebut dipublikasikan.  Berdasarkan ketentuan pasal 95 Undang-Undang Hak Cipta, pencipta atau pemegang hak cipta atau ahli waris dari pencipta permainan video dapat mengajukan tuntutan ganti rugi ke Pengadilan Niaga kepada pelaku pelanggaran hak ekonomi pencipta permainan video.   The purpose of this scientific journal is to know the rules of the video games in the Copyright law and to know how the copyright legal protection against video games violations. In this paper, the research method used is normative legal research which uses a statutory approach. The result of this journal are indicate there is a blurry norm in Article 40 paragraph letter r of Copyright law. The ambiguity of norm is cleary seen because there is no further explanation related to the understanding of video games and their classification and it is also cleary that there are void norm related to sanction for violators of the creator’s moral rights wich are not carried out not for commercial activities. Then, the second conclusions is that video games are one of the object of a creation that get protection from Copyright laws, the protection os valid for 50 years since the video games was published. Based on the Article 95 of Copyright law, the creator or copyright holder or the heirs of creator of video games can submit compensations claims to the Commersial Court to the perpretators of violations of the economic rights of the video games creator’s.

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION OF LURIK ART CONSERVATION THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 2 IN KLATEN REGENCYLEGAL PROTECTION OF LURIK ART CONSERVATION THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 2 IN KLATEN REGENCY

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
Riska Andi Fitriono ◽  
Sarwono .
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Art Conservation ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

This article aimed to analyze legal protection of Lurik Art Conservation Through <br />Intellectual Property Rights in Klaten Regency. Klaten is the area that is most<br />concerned with the survival of lurik weaving. There is someone mentioned that the<br />Klaten Regency was the capital of lurik weaving. Because the weaving of Looms<br />are not machines or Alat Tenun Bukan Mesin (hereinafter abbreviated to ATBM) <br />is a mainstay of this city. There are countless villages that become centers of lurik <br />craftsmen. This research is empirical or non-doctrinal research, which is a study<br />that sees the law not only from the perspective of legislation, but also sees the law<br />in its implementation. The results of the study show that the first legal protection in<br />preserving the current lurik art in Klaten, namely the Klaten Regency Government,<br />then stipulates the Regent's Regulation Number 53 of 2010 Article 23 Paragraph (9)<br />on the Daily Batik and Traditional Weaving Lurik Service or ATBM Striated and<br />the Klaten Regent's Decree Number : 065/1014/06 December 30, 2010 on Wearing<br />Traditional Weaving, Motives, Colors and Free Models with Attributes. Furthermore,<br />based on the Decree of the Regent of Klaten Number 050/84 of 2016 on Klaten<br />Regency's Superior Products, batik striated is one of the superior products of Klaten<br />Regency. With the issuance of these rules as an effort to protect and preserve lurik<br />art in Klaten district and referring to Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, it has<br />regulated the forms of protection of lurik art in Klaten through Article 40 paragraph<br />(1). The Second Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Against Lurik Art, namely<br />Protection of lurik artworks, besides being accommodated in Law Number 28 of 2014<br />on Copyright (Copyright Law) and Trademark Law and other intellectual property<br />right laws. Elucidation of Article 40 paragraph (1) letter j of the Copyright Law. The<br />work is protected because it has artistic value, both in relation to the picture, style,<br />and color composition. The Copyright Act also emphasizes that it is important to<br />protect Copyright because every creator, in this case, the creator of the lurik motif<br />has the right to moral rights and economic rights.

scholarly journals The Sampling and Remix Dilemma: What is the Role of Moral Rights in the Encouragement and Regulation of Derivative Creativity?

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Adeney
Keyword(s):  
Community Support ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Copyright Material

The borrowing and rearrangement of musical content, especially in the digital context, raises difficult questions for copyright law. There is significant community support for a loosening of the restrictions on the derivative (and particularly creative) use of copyright material. Law reform is called for. This paper discusses the possible introduction of a new exception to copyright infringement but notes that in the drafting of any such exception not only the economic rights but also the moral rights of the originating author need to be taken into account.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL TERHADAP SKETSA DAN BENTUK OGOH-OGOH

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1483
Author(s):  
I Putu Dianda Ega Dinanda ◽  
I Wayan Wiryawan
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Individual Rights ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community Groups ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Or Groups ◽  
The Government ◽  
Traditional Cultural Expressions

Ogoh-ogoh merupakan budaya masyarakat Bali yang pada umumnya berhubungan dengan upacara agama umat hindu. Seiring dengan perkembangan ogoh-ogoh bukan hanya digunakan di dalam upacara agama atau acara adat saja. Pemerintah maupun kelompok masyarakat sering mengadakan lomba ogoh-ogoh dengan berbagai kriteria sebagai dasar penilaiannya. Hal tersebut menyebabkan munculnya nama-nama baik perseorangan maupun kelompok masyarakat yang menjadi terkenal dengan bentuk ogoh-ogohnya yang dinilai sebagai yang terbaik oleh masyarakat Bali. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum atas sketsa dan bentuk ogoh-ogoh sebagai hak cipta guna melindungi sketsa dan bentuk ogoh-ogoh yang diciptakan oleh perseorangan atau kelompok agar tidak digunakan secara tidak bertanggung jawab oleh kelompok atau orang lainnya. Hal ini juga ditekankan pada penghargaan bagi pencipta sketsa dan bentuk ogoh-ogoh tersebut. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil yang didapatkan dari penelitian ini bahwa menurut Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta, sketsa dan bentuk ogoh-ogoh dapat dikatagorikan sebagai modifikasi ekspresi budaya tradisional dan bisa dijadikan individual right. Sketa ogoh-ogoh sebaiknya dapat didaftarkan sebagai hak cipta bagi orang ataupun kelompok yang menciptakannya sehingga terhindar dari pencurian ide serta dapat melindungi hak moral dan hak ekonomi penciptanya. Ogoh-ogoh is a Balinese culture that is generally associated with Hindu religious ceremonies. Along with the development of ogoh-ogoh not only used in religious ceremonies or traditional events. The government and community groups often hold ogoh-ogoh competitions with various criteria as the basis for their assessment. This has led to the emergence of the names of individuals and community groups who have become famous for their ogoh-ogoh forms which are considered the best by the Balinese. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal protection of sketches and forms of ogoh-ogoh as copyright in order to protect the sketches and forms of ogoh-ogoh created by individuals or groups from being used irresponsibly by groups or other people. It also emphasized the appreciation for the creators of the sketches and forms of the ogoh-ogoh. This paper uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study are that according to Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, sketches and forms of ogoh-ogoh can be categorized as modification of traditional cultural expressions and can be used as individual rights. Sketa ogoh-ogoh should be registered as a copyright for the person or group that created it so as to avoid the theft of ideas and can protect the moral rights and economic rights of their creators.

scholarly journals HAK EKONOMI DAN HAK MORAL KARYA CIPTA POTRET DI SOSIAL MEDIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Desyanti Suka Asih K.Tus
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
Exclusive Right

<p>Copyright is an exclusive right which contains economic rights and moral rights. Portrait is part of a protected creation. In a portrait that is distributed offline or online through social media, namely economic rights and moral rights that must be presented and adhered to by users. Copyright infragement that still occur for portraits on social media are related to violations of economic and moral rights. The use of portraits on social media without permission for commercial purposes is a form of violation of economic rights. While the form of violations of moral rights over portraits is not to include the creator or source of portraits used in social media. The regulation and protection of economic and moral rights of portraits on social media are regulated in the Copyright Law. Economic rights are stipulated in Article 12 to Article 15. Moral rights are stipulated in Article 5 to Article 7.</p>

scholarly journals DISSEMINATION OF COPYRIGHT LAW IN DIGITAL PRODUCTS IN SEMARANG CITY

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-54
Author(s):  
Andry Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Creative Work ◽  
Digital Products ◽  
Intellectual Work ◽  
Economic Rights

A creative work created by its creator based on his sense and intention which is supported by his creativity will become an intellectual work with a high economic value. Such creators are like book and song writers who have an ability and idea to produce a work that can be enjoyed by everyone. Based on the principle of justice, it is understood that to produce such work is not an easy task because it requires sacrifice. Therefore, the creator is entitled to economic benefits for his work. An intellectual work having a very high economic value is supposed to get adequate legal protection supported by a sense of justice as the reward of the creator’s intellectual products. In addition to physical copyrighted work products, there are also digital products on which the creator owns a copyright. There are examples of digital products which follow the development of technology such as song files, e-books, software, etc. One of the problems that exists in the community is that the digital product becomes easier to be pirated or illegally downloaded through the internet. How is copyright protection in digital products as the embodiment of the creator's creative works. Copyright protection against creators and copyright holders pursuant to Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright. Article 1 number 1 and Article 24 paragraph (1) and (2). The creator or copyright holder has rights to be protected by the government, namely economic rights and moral rights. The existence of economic rights and moral rights is then someone's creative work will have its own values, so it is not easy to use his property for commercial purposes by the parties who are not responsible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document