Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Nonfermentative Gram negative Bacteria Isolated from Blood Cultures

ANKEM Dergisi ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 79-85
Author(s):  
Esra Gultekin ◽  
M. Hamidullah Uyanik ◽  
Hayrunisa Hanci ◽  
Zeynep Erdil ◽  
Fatma Nesime Gelen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative

scholarly journals Direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative bacteria from positive blood cultures

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Zappavigna ◽  
Enrica Cavatorta ◽  
Rossana Chiarabini ◽  
Roberta Schiavo ◽  
Daniela Padrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative

scholarly journals Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria from positive blood cultures using the Accelerate Pheno™ system

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Måns Ullberg ◽  
Volkan Özenci
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Hands On

Abstract Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing remain a crucial step for early efficient therapy of bloodstream infections. Traditional methods require turnaround times of at least 2 days, while rapid procedures are often associated with extended hands-on time. The Accelerate Pheno™ System provides microbial identification results within 90 min and susceptibility data in approximately 7 h directly from positive blood cultures with only few minutes of hands-on time. The aim of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the performance of the Accelerate Pheno™ System in identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria directly from clinical blood culture samples. We analyzed 108 and 67 blood culture bottles using the Accelerate PhenoTest™ BC kit with software version v1.0 and the FDA-cleared version v1.2, respectively. Reliable identification was achieved for Enterobacteriaceae, staphylococci, and enterococci, with 76/80 (95%), 42/46 (91%), and 10/11 (91%) correct identifications. Limitations were observed in the identification of streptococci, including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes, and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Antimicrobial susceptibility results for Enterobacteriaceae, for amikacin, ertapenem, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam ranged between 86 and 100% categorical agreement. Using v1.2, results for ceftazidime showed 100% concordance with the reference method. For staphylococci, the overall performance reached 92% using v1.2. Qualitative tests for detection of methicillin or macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSB) resistance caused major and very major errors for isolates. Overall, the present data show that the Accelerate Pheno™ system can, in combination with Gram stain, be used as a rapid complementation to standard microbial diagnosis of bloodstream infections.

Rapid demonstration of septic or infectious arthritis due to Gram-negative bacteria

1992 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 686-687
Author(s):  
Jacob S. Hanker ◽  
Paul R. Gross ◽  
Beverly L. Giammara
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Arthritis ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Infectious Arthritis ◽  
Bacterial Arthritis ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria

Blood cultures are positive in approximately only 50 per cent of the patients with nongonococcal bacterial infectious arthritis and about 20 per cent of those with gonococcal arthritis. But the concept that gram-negative bacteria could be involved even in chronic arthritis is well-supported. Gram stains are more definitive in staphylococcal arthritis caused by gram-positive bacteria than in bacterial arthritis due to gram-negative bacteria. In the latter situation where gram-negative bacilli are the problem, Gram stains are helpful for 50% of the patients; they are only helpful for 25% of the patients, however, where gram-negative gonococci are the problem. In arthritis due to gram-positive Staphylococci. Gramstained smears are positive for 75% of the patients.

Carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria: current epidemics, antimicrobial susceptibility and treatment options

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shio-Shin Jean ◽  
Wen-Sen Lee ◽  
Carlos Lam ◽  
Chin-Wang Hsu ◽  
Ray-Jade Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative

Prevalence and Antibiogram of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Producing Gram-negative Bacteria Isolated from Septicemic Neonates in a Tertiary Care Hospital

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 171-175
Author(s):  
Tania Rahman ◽  
Momtaz Begum ◽  
Sharmeen Sultana ◽  
SM Shamsuzzaman
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Beta Lactamase ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase ◽  
Extended Spectrum ◽  
Esbl Producers

Background: In recent years, Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing microorganisms have complicated treatment of infections due to resistance of ESBL producing strains to a wide range of antimicrobials. Objective: Target of this study was to determine the prevalence of ESBL producing gramnegative bacteria in neonatal sepsis cases and to reveal the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of those isolated ESBL producers. Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study was carried out in Dhaka Medical College Hospital (DMCH) over a period of 12 months from January to December in 2016. Following isolation and identification of gram-negative bacteria from blood samples of suspected septicemic neonates, antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed by Kirby Bauer disk-diffusion method and ESBL producers were detected by Double Disk Synergy (DDS) test. Results: Among 52 Gram-negative bacteria isolated from 106 blood samples, 34.61% ESBL producers were detected and Enterobacter spp. (45%) was predominant followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (33.33%). None of the ESBL producers was resistant to colistin and tigecycline. All ESBL producing Acinetobacter baumannii, 77.78% and 66.67% of ESBL producing Enterobacter spp and Klebsiella spp. respectively showed resistance to meropenem. All ESBL producers were resistant to piperacillintazobactam. Conclusion: Appropriate measures should be taken to prevent the spread of ESBL producing strains by combining strategies for infection prevention, control and rational use of antibiotics. KYAMC Journal Vol. 11, No.-4, January 2021, Page 171-175

scholarly journals Sepsis in cancer patients residing in Zimbabwe: Spectrum of bacterial and fungal aetiologies and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
FRANK CHINOWAITA ◽  
Wendy Chaka ◽  
Tinashe K Nyazika ◽  
Tendai C Maboreke ◽  
Inam Chitsike ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Methicillin Resistance ◽  
Antimicrobial Treatment ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Susceptibility Patterns

Abstract Introduction: Cancer and sepsis comorbidity is a major public health problem in most parts of the world including Zimbabwe. The microbial aetiologies of sepsis and their antibiograms vary with time and locations. Knowledge on local microbial aetiologies of sepsis and their susceptibility patterns is critical in guiding empirical antimicrobial treatment choices. Methods: This was a descriptive cross sectional study which determined the microbial aetiologies of sepsis from blood cultures of paediatric and adult cancer patients obtained between July 2016 and June 2017. The TDR-X120 blood culture system and TDR 300B auto identification machine were used for incubation of blood culture bottles and identification plus antimicrobial susceptibility testing, respectively. Results: A total of 142 participants were enrolled; 50 (35.2%) had positive blood cultures with 56.0% gram positive, 42.0% gram negative bacteria and 2.0% yeast isolates. Most common isolates were Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (22.0%), Escherichia coli (16.0%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.0%), Enterococcus faecalis (14.0%) and Staphylococcus aureus (8.0%) in all cancer patients. These isolates were similar in both haematological and solid cancers. Amikacin and meropenem showed 85.7% and 95.2% activity respectively against all gram negative isolates while vancomycin and linezolid were effective against 96.2% and 100.0% of all gram positive isolates respectively. Ten (66.7%) isolates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae were extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) positive and the same proportion was observed on methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus species. Conclusions: The major microbial aetiologies of sepsis among patients with cancer in Zimbabwe were CoNS, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. faecalis and S. aureus. Most isolates were resistant to commonly used empirical antibiotics and there was high level of ESBL and methicillin resistance carriage. A nationwide survey on microbial aetiologies of sepsis and their susceptibility patterns would assist in the guidance of effective sepsis empiric antimicrobial treatment among patients with cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document