scholarly journals There’s no place like home: from cultural plurality to convergence in remote heartbeats

TEXT ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zinia Mitra ◽  
Pablo Musera
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Plurality

Pendidikan Nilai dalam Era Pluralitas

1970 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-311
Author(s):  
Ruslan Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Social Problems ◽  
Values Education ◽  
Moral Values ◽  
Social Solidarity ◽  
Cultural Conflict ◽  
Moral Training ◽  
Education Activity ◽  
Cultural Plurality

Values education is activity which help students in order that they have instruction which determine all of their actions. Values education is considered urgent in education activity. It is purposed to build social solidarity, especially in religion and cultural plurality era. The reality of social, religion, and cultural conflict, showed education functions as transfer of moral values still optimal yet. Therefore, values education include moral training must be aplicated to help students be up against social problems in their life. 

scholarly journals Croquages de langue en formation d’enseignants

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-88
Author(s):  
Annemarie Dinvaut
Keyword(s):  
College Of Education ◽  
Teaching Skills ◽  
Language Awareness ◽  
Nous Proposons ◽  
Affective Experience ◽  
Intercultural Skills ◽  
Cultural Plurality ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cette Question

Le sensoriel et l’expression plastique sont-ils des outils de formation pertinents pour aller à la rencontre de l’altérité et de la diversité linguistique et culturelle ? Nous nous proposons de répondre à cette question en analysant des productions d’étudiants : ceux-ci rendent compte de leur fréquentation d’une langue par une création plastique qui privilégie les aspects sensoriels de cette expérience. Ce double processus les amène à une réflexion métalinguistique et à une posture d’accueil du plurilinguisme. We sketch our languages and develop teaching skills Abstract: Are sensorial and plastic activities appropriate tools to develop language awareness and intercultural skills, in a college of education? To answer this question, we ask students to express their sensorial and affective experience of a language they choose: scrutinizing their productions enables us to see the impact of this activity, regarding their metalinguistic reflection and their receptiveness to linguistic and cultural plurality.

scholarly journals The ordinary, cultures, and management: the organizing processes within the handicraft sector in Piúma (ES), Brazil

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (95) ◽  
pp. 644-673
Author(s):  
Filipe Cabacine Lopes Machado ◽  
Alfredo Rodrigues Leite da Silva ◽  
Talita Almeida Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Popular Culture ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Alternative View ◽  
Everyday Practices ◽  
External Pressures ◽  
Document Collection ◽  
Narrative Practice ◽  
Cultural Plurality ◽  
Narrative Temporality ◽  
The City

Abstract This article aims to understand the ordinary management of the resistances and forms of survival, organized in everyday practices that are in part product and producers of cultural plurality in the field of handicrafts in the city of Piúma, Brazil. From the perspective of practice-based studies (Feldman & Orlikowski, 2011), we articulate theoretically the approach of ordinary management (Carrieri, Perdigão & Aguiar, 2014) of craft production (Sennett, 2009) and the certeaunian contributions. These contributions are directed towards the recognition of the games of force relations within a cultural plurality. In proposing the focus on this plurality, this article fills a gap, because in previous studies on ordinary management, this cultural plurality has not been specifically addressed. The proposal was supported by a qualitative research, accomplished through document collection, participant observation, and unstructured interviews with five artisans from Piúma. In the analysis of the data, we articulate the narrative practice in De Certeau (1985) and narrative temporality in Ricoeur (1994). As results, we identify different networks of force relations in which artisans are involved in organizing practices of ordinary management. In them, cultures have shown themselves as plural productions, moving away from the view of a popular culture, external to everyday practices or submissive to other external pressures. This article contributes to an alternative view at the Ordinary Management of handicrafts and other organizational actions based on cultural plurality.

scholarly journals Mouzelis y Alexander: lecturas críticas del esquema evolucionista de Talcott Parsons

2014 ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Natalio Pagés ◽  
Nicolás Rubí
Keyword(s):  
Social Change ◽  
Social System ◽  
General System ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Talcott Parsons ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Institutional Differentiation ◽  
Last Stage ◽  
Cultural Plurality

Categoría: MonografíaFecha de recepción: 28 de mayo de 2012Fecha de aprobación: 12 de julio de 2012Resumen En la última etapa de su producción teórica, Parsons concentra sus esfuerzos en la construcción de un sistema general que permita pensar la evolución de las sociedades humanas. Propone el concepto de comunidad societal para resolver el problema de la integración del sistema social ante un contexto moderno de procesos de cambio que promueven creciente diferenciación institucional y pluralidad cultural (potenciación del conflicto). En este artículo nos encargaremos de rastrear las lecturas críticas de Alexander y Mouzelis sobre el esquema parsoniano del cambio social, para identificar los núcleos problemáticos que ambos observan y evaluar hasta qué punto sus propuestas logran escapar de los conflictos del marco evolucionista y despejar a la comunidad societal de sus tensiones internas. Palabras clave: Comunidad Societal – Evolucionismo – Diferenciación – Cambio social Abstract In the last stage of his theoretical production, Parsons develops a general system that tries to explain the evolution of human societies. He proposes the notion of Societal Community to solve the problem of Integration within a Social System that presents developed institutional differentiation and cultural plurality. In this article, we will trace the critical readings of Alexander and Mouzelis on the parsonian scheme of Social Change. We’ll approach the theoretical problems that both of them observe and evaluate their proposal. Our main task is to find out if Alexander and Mouzelis manage to avoid the difficulties of the evolutionist framework and liberate the Societal Community from its inner tensions. Keywords: Societal Community – Evolutionism – Differentiation – Social Change 

scholarly journals Disenso, resistencia y dialogismo: sobre el ensayo de Juan Benet como puente entre la república y la democracia actual

2020 ◽  
pp. 15-28
Author(s):  
Ken Benson
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Social Reality ◽  
Literary Production ◽  
Primary Method ◽  
Cultural Plurality ◽  
Aesthetic Formalism ◽  
Post War

El trabajo plantea la relevancia de la ensayística y la producción literaria de Juan Benet (1927-1993) como disenso y resistencia ante la pobreza intelectual en la España de la postguerra. Si bien hay autores que consideran su formalismo estetizante como elitista y alejada de la realidad social, pretendemos mostrar cómo esta postura constituye una ética de disenso y resistencia con respecto al poder fáctico y una continuidad con la riqueza y pluralidad cultural bajo la República. Se argumenta que el método primordial usado por el autor es el dialogismo, constituyendo el texto una especie de campo de batalla de ideas en oposición y en continua lucha. Finalmente, el pensamiento crítico de Benet sirve igualmente de puente en la construcción democrática del país en los años setenta, pero es vista también como de gran actualidad en la crisis de valores del mundo actual.   The work raises the relevance of the essay and literary production of Juan Benet (1927-1993) as dissent and resistance to intellectual poverty in post-war Spain. Although there are authors who consider their aesthetic formalism as elitist and far from social reality, we intend to show how this position constitutes an ethic of dissensus and resistance with respect to the factual power and a continuity with the richness and cultural plurality under the previous Republic. It is argued that the primary method used by the author is dialogism, the text constituting a kind of battleground of ideas in opposition and in continuous struggle. Finally, Benet’s critical thinking also serves as a bridge in the democratic construction of the country in the 1970s, but it is also seen as very topical in the crisis of values ​​in today’s world.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document