Correcting for Static Shift of Magnetotelluric Data with Airborne Electromagnetic Measurements: A Case Study from Rathlin Basin, Northern Ireland

Galvanic distortions of magnetotelluric (MT) data, such as the static shift effect, are a known problem that can lead to incorrect estimation of resistivities and erroneous modelling of geometries with resulting misinterpretation of subsurface electrical resistivity structure. A wide variety of approaches have been proposed to account for these galvanic distortions, some depending on the target area, with varying degrees of success. The natural laboratory for our study is a hydraulically permeable volume of conductive sediment at depth, the internal resistivity structure of which can be used to estimate reservoir viability for geothermal purposes, however static shift correction is required in order to ensure robust and precise modelling accuracy. We propose a method employing frequency–domain electromagnetic data for static shift correction, which in our case are regionally available with high spatial density. The spatial distributions of the derived static shift corrections are analysed and applied to the uncorrected MT data prior to inversion. Two comparative inversion models are derived, one with and one without static shift corrections, with instructive results. As expected from the one–dimensional analogy of static shift correction, at shallow model depths, where the structure is controlled by a single local MT site, the correction of static shift effects leads to vertical scaling of resistivity-thickness products in the model, with the corrected model showing improved correlation to existing borehole wireline resistivity data. In turn, as these vertical scalings are effectively independent of adjacent sites, lateral resistivity distributions are also affected, with up to half a decade of resistivity variation between the models estimated at depths down to 2000 m. Simple estimation of differences in bulk porosity, derived using Archie’s Law, between the two models reinforces our conclusion that the sub–order of magnitude resistivity contrasts induced by correction of static shifts correspond to similar contrasts in estimated porosities, and hence, for purposes of reservoir investigation or similar cases requiring accurate absolute resistivity estimates, galvanic distortion correction, especially static shift correction, is essential.