scholarly journals Characteristics, calibration and measurement uncertainty of RF field strength meters in the frequency range up to 18 GHz

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 435-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Pape ◽  
K. Münter ◽  
T. Schrader

Abstract. Due to their construction, the devices used for the measurement of electromagnetic fields (radiation monitors) must be calibrated individually. The measurement data obtained are documented in a calibration certificate and the user must take them into account in the uncertainty budget he has to draw up. In addition to the uncertainty contributions of the field representation and of the transfer, other contributions occur which depend on the special constructive features of these devices. When the uncertainty budget is drawn up, it depends on the application and the information about the field structure which contributions will have an effect and which will not. The procedure will be explained by an example.

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 7-14
Author(s):  
T. Schrader ◽  
T. Kleine-Ostmann ◽  
J. Bredemeyer

Abstract. We present a traceable calibration of a specially designed horizontally polarised reference antenna with an omnidirectional pattern in the E-plane for the frequency range between 105 MHz and 120 MHz. This antenna is used as a validation tool for absolute field strength measurements at the localizer transmitter of an instrument landing system (ILS) at airports and is carried by a helicopter. We investigate whether we can treat it as a dipole-like antenna in the calibration setup despite its disk-shape body. We also investigate the suitability of an anechoic chamber for antenna calibration though it was not designed for that purpose. The measurements are based on scattering parameters (S-parameters) which we apply in the 3-antenna-method (TAM or 3-AM) to obtain the antenna gain and the antenna factor, respectively. An uncertainty budget for the antenna gain calibration is derived. We also report on the first practical application of the calibrated reference antenna.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 1182-1190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Farrance ◽  
Robert Frenkel ◽  
Tony Badrick

AbstractThe long-anticipated ISO/TS 20914, Medical laboratories – Practical guidance for the estimation of measurement uncertainty, became publicly available in July 2019. This ISO document is intended as a guide for the practical application of estimating uncertainty in measurement (measurement uncertainty) in a medical laboratory. In some respects, the guide does indeed meet many of its stated objectives with numerous very detailed examples. Even though it is claimed that this ISO guide is based on the Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM), JCGM 100:2008, it is with some concern that we believe several important statements and statistical procedures are incorrect, with others potentially misleading. The aim of this report is to highlight the major concerns which we have identified. In particular, we believe the following items require further comment: (1) The use of coefficient of variation and its potential for misuse requires clarification, (2) pooled variance and measurement uncertainty across changes in measuring conditions has been oversimplified and is potentially misleading, (3) uncertainty in the results of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) do not include all known uncertainties, (4) the international normalized ratio (INR) calculation is incorrect, (5) the treatment of bias uncertainty is considered problematic, (6) the rules for evaluating combined uncertainty in functional relationships are incomplete, and (7) specific concerns with some individual statements.


Measurement ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 180-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Unai Mutilba ◽  
Alejandro Sandá ◽  
Ibon Vega ◽  
Eneko Gomez-Acedo ◽  
Ion Bengoetxea ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-104
Author(s):  
Jide Julius Popoola ◽  
Akinlolu Adediran Ponnle ◽  
Yekeen Olajide Olasoji ◽  
Samson Adenle Oyetunji

ABSTRACT: Owing to their speed of excution as well as their limited reliance on detailed knowledge of the terrain characteristics of the service environments, empirical propagation models have enjoyed general acceptability in the wireless communication research community. However, recent industrial observations show that no single propagation model can best fit all the radio service environments, which led to the hypothesis of specific models for specific environments. In order to scientifically verify this hypothesis, the study presented in this paper investigated the performance of the free space propagation loss (FSPL) model in two different radio environments characterised with different types of obstructions. The investigation was conducted through field strength distribution measurement of two broadcasting radio stations transmitting at 96.5 MHz and 102.3 MHz. The field strength measurement data obtained were analysed. The result of the analysis shows gross disparity between the measured path losses and calculated path losses using FSPL model. The disparity thus necessitates the modification of the FSPL model in order to develop each propagation model for each of the two radio stations employed and their environment. The developed models were then evaluated to ascertain their performances relative to the FSPL model. The performance evaluation results show that the predictions of the developed propagation models vary for each of the two environments. Furthermore, the comparative performance evaluation result of the developed models with similar studies in the literature shows that the developed models perform favourably. The overall result from the developed models confirms the hypothesis that each location requires a specific propagation model for proper radio wave design and quality of signal transmission and reception. ABSTRAK: Kelebihan yang ada pada kelajuan perlaksanaannya dan juga kurang pergantungannya pada butiran terperinci ciri-ciri khusus bentuk rupa bumi di persekitaran servisnya, model penyebaran empirik telah diterima umum dalam komuniti kajian komunikasi tanpa wayar. Walau bagaimanapun, pemerhatian industri terkini menunjukkan tidak ada sebarang model penyebaran yang sesuai bagi semua keadaan servis radio, ini menghala kepada hipotesis keperluan model tertentu pada keadaan servis tertentu. Bagi menentusahkan secara saintifik hipotesis ini, kajian yang dibentangkan dalam kertas ini mengkaji tentang prestasi model kehilangan penyebaran pada ruang bebas (FSPL) dalam dua persekitaran radio berlainan melalui beberapa jenis halangan berbeza. Kajian telah dijalankan ke atas dua stesen radio penyiaran pada frekuensi 96.5 MHz dan 102.3 MHz melalui ukuran sebaran ruang keupayaan. Data ukuran ruang keupayaan telah diperoleh dan dianalisa. Keputusan analisis menunjukkan keputusan tidak seragam yang melampau antara ukuran kehilangan laluan dan pada kiraan model FSPL. Ketidaksamaan ini memungkinkan keperluan mengubah model FSPL bagi membangunkan model penyebaran pada setiap dua radio stesen yang digunakan dan persekitarannya. Model yang dibangunkan ini kemudiannya dinilai bagi mengesahkan prestasinya dengan model FSPL. Keputusan penilaian menunjukkan perbezaan pada jangkaan model penyebaran bagi setiap dua keadaan. Tambahan, keputusan perbandingan model yang dibangunkan dalam karya ini adalah serupa seperti kajian lain yang berkaitan. Secara keseluruhannya model yang dibangunkan ini mengesahkan hipotesis bahawa setiap lokasi memerlukan model penyebaran bagi rekaan gelombang radio yang sesuai dan juga kualiti signal penyebaran dan penerimaan.


1992 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reba Godman ◽  
Johann Bumann ◽  
Lin-Xiang Wei ◽  
Ann Shirley-Henderson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document