scholarly journals Effects of Button Pressing and Mental Counting on N100, N200, and P300 of Auditory-Event-Related Potential Recording

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimitaka Kaga ◽  
Tadanori Fukami ◽  
Naoyuki Masubuchi ◽  
Bunnoshin Ishikawa
Keyword(s):  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Auditory Event ◽  
Potential Recording ◽  
Mental Counting

scholarly journals N100, N200, and P300 Auditory Event-Related Potentials Depending on Handedness and Response Tasks such as Button Pressing and Mental Counting

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-320
Author(s):  
Jinsook Kim ◽  
Kieun Lee ◽  
Eunsung Lee
Keyword(s):  
Event Related Potentials ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
P300 Amplitude ◽  
Oddball Paradigm ◽  
Auditory Event ◽  
Counting Task ◽  
Left Handed ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Related Potentials ◽  
Mental Counting

Purpose: This study was to determine the effects of response tasks, such as button pressing and mental counting, and handedness on N100, N200, and P300 auditory event-related potential (AERP).Methods: A total of 50 normal-hearing young adults with the average age of 21.6 (±1.5) years participated in this study. Among them, 15 men and 15 women were right-handed and 10 men and 10 women were left-handed. An oddball paradigm was used to deliver 30 stimuli of 2 kHz target tone bursts and 120 stimuli of 1 kHz nontarget tone bursts. The stimuli were presented at 70 dB sound pressure level with the rate of 1/s.Results: The button pressing task elicited significantly smaller N100 and larger P300 amplitudes than the mental counting task. N200 latency was significantly lower and P300 amplitude was higher in left-handed participants than those who are right-handed. Appearance percentages of right-/left-handed participants for N100, N200, and P300 were 80/95%, 85/85%, and 75/75% for the button pressing task and 80/90%, 80/80%, and 70/70% for mental counting task, respectively.Conclusion: The significant difference in appearance percentage between response tasks supported that P300 was a strong endogenous potential. N100 and N200 were thought to have both endogenous and exogenous characteristics. A more sensitive approach in selecting the task of response for the target stimuli and careful consideration for the handedness is necessary for AERP recordings.

A combined forced-attention dichotic listening – Go/Nogo task to assess response inhibition and interference suppression: An auditory event-related potential investigation.

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1136-1150
Author(s):  
Nathalie Bedoin ◽  
Raphaëlle Abadie ◽  
Jennifer Krzonowski ◽  
Emmanuel Ferragne ◽  
Agathe Marcastel
Keyword(s):  
Response Inhibition ◽  
Dichotic Listening ◽  
Interference Suppression ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Auditory Event

scholarly journals Effect of Distracting Background Speech in an Auditory Brain–Computer Interface

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Álvaro Fernández-Rodríguez ◽  
Ricardo Ron-Angevin ◽  
Ernesto J. Sanz-Arigita ◽  
Antoine Parize ◽  
Juliette Esquirol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Computer Interface ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Computer Interface ◽  
Cognitive Workload ◽  
Auditory Event ◽  
Shared Attention ◽  
Attentional Condition ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Auditory Bci

Studies so far have analyzed the effect of distractor stimuli in different types of brain–computer interface (BCI). However, the effect of a background speech has not been studied using an auditory event-related potential (ERP-BCI), a convenient option when the visual path cannot be adopted by users. Thus, the aim of the present work is to examine the impact of a background speech on selection performance and user workload in auditory BCI systems. Eleven participants tested three conditions: (i) auditory BCI control condition, (ii) auditory BCI with a background speech to ignore (non-attentional condition), and (iii) auditory BCI while the user has to pay attention to the background speech (attentional condition). The results demonstrated that, despite no significant differences in performance, shared attention to auditory BCI and background speech required a higher cognitive workload. In addition, the P300 target stimuli in the non-attentional condition were significantly higher than those in the attentional condition for several channels. The non-attentional condition was the only condition that showed significant differences in the amplitude of the P300 between target and non-target stimuli. The present study indicates that background speech, especially when it is attended to, is an important interference that should be avoided while using an auditory BCI.

scholarly journals Neuro Cognitive Improvement During Pregnancy: An Auditory Event Related Potential (ERP) and Neuropsychological Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atiyah Ali ◽  
Tahamina Begum ◽  
Faruque Reza ◽  
Wan Rosilawati Wan Rosli ◽  
Wan Nor Azlen Wan Mohamad
Keyword(s):  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Auditory Event ◽  
Cognitive Improvement ◽  
Neuropsychological Study

Serotonin Dysfunction and Suicide Attempts in Major Depressives: An Auditory Event-Related Potential Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tai-Jui Chen ◽  
Younger W.-Y. Yu ◽  
Ming-Chao Chen ◽  
Shing-Yaw Wang ◽  
Shih-Jen Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Suicide Attempts ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Auditory Event ◽  
Potential Study

The P300 auditory event-related potential as a method to assess the benefit of contralateral hearing aid use in bimodal listeners: a proof-of-concept

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-80
Author(s):  
Lindsey N. Van Yper ◽  
Ingeborg J. M. Dhooge ◽  
Katrien Vermeire ◽  
Eddy F. J. De Vel ◽  
Andy J. Beynon
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Proof Of Concept ◽  
Auditory Event ◽  
Hearing Aid Use
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document