A combined forced-attention dichotic listening – Go/Nogo task to assess response inhibition and interference suppression: An auditory event-related potential investigation.

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1136-1150
Author(s):  
Nathalie Bedoin ◽  
Raphaëlle Abadie ◽  
Jennifer Krzonowski ◽  
Emmanuel Ferragne ◽  
Agathe Marcastel
Keyword(s):  
Response Inhibition ◽  
Dichotic Listening ◽  
Interference Suppression ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Auditory Event

scholarly journals Dissociable Components of Cognitive Control: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Study of Response Inhibition and Interference Suppression

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e34482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brydges ◽  
Karen Clunies-Ross ◽  
Madeleine Clohessy ◽  
Zhao Li Lo ◽  
An Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Control ◽  
Response Inhibition ◽  
Interference Suppression ◽  
Event Related Potential

scholarly journals Inhibitory Dimensions and Delay of Gratification: A Comparative Study on Individuals with Down Syndrome and Typically Developing Children

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 636
Author(s):  
Martina Fontana ◽  
Maria Carmen Usai ◽  
Sandra Pellizzoni ◽  
Maria Chiara Passolunghi
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Response Inhibition ◽  
Interference Suppression ◽  
Delay Of Gratification ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Older Individuals ◽  
Typically Developing Children ◽  
Mental Age ◽  
Two Samples

While previous research on inhibition in people with Down syndrome (DS) reported contradictory results, with no explicit theoretical model, on the other hand, a more homogeneous impaired profile on the delay of gratification skills emerged. The main goal of the present study was to investigate response inhibition, interference suppression, and delay of gratification in 51 individuals with DS matched for a measure of mental age (MA) with 71 typically developing (TD) children. Moreover, we cross-sectionally explored the strengths and weaknesses of these components in children and adolescents vs. adults with DS with the same MA. A battery of laboratory tasks tapping on inhibitory sub-components and delay of gratification was administrated. Results indicated that individuals with DS showed an overall worse performance compared to TD children on response inhibition and delay of gratification, while no differences emerged between the two samples on the interference suppression. Additionally, our results suggested that older individuals with DS outperformed the younger ones both in response inhibition and in the delay of gratification, whereas the interference suppression still remains impaired in adulthood. This study highlights the importance of evaluating inhibitory sub-components considering both MA and chronological age in order to promote more effective and evidence-based training for this population.

scholarly journals Effect of Distracting Background Speech in an Auditory Brain–Computer Interface

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Álvaro Fernández-Rodríguez ◽  
Ricardo Ron-Angevin ◽  
Ernesto J. Sanz-Arigita ◽  
Antoine Parize ◽  
Juliette Esquirol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Computer Interface ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Computer Interface ◽  
Cognitive Workload ◽  
Auditory Event ◽  
Shared Attention ◽  
Attentional Condition ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Auditory Bci

Studies so far have analyzed the effect of distractor stimuli in different types of brain–computer interface (BCI). However, the effect of a background speech has not been studied using an auditory event-related potential (ERP-BCI), a convenient option when the visual path cannot be adopted by users. Thus, the aim of the present work is to examine the impact of a background speech on selection performance and user workload in auditory BCI systems. Eleven participants tested three conditions: (i) auditory BCI control condition, (ii) auditory BCI with a background speech to ignore (non-attentional condition), and (iii) auditory BCI while the user has to pay attention to the background speech (attentional condition). The results demonstrated that, despite no significant differences in performance, shared attention to auditory BCI and background speech required a higher cognitive workload. In addition, the P300 target stimuli in the non-attentional condition were significantly higher than those in the attentional condition for several channels. The non-attentional condition was the only condition that showed significant differences in the amplitude of the P300 between target and non-target stimuli. The present study indicates that background speech, especially when it is attended to, is an important interference that should be avoided while using an auditory BCI.

scholarly journals Neuro Cognitive Improvement During Pregnancy: An Auditory Event Related Potential (ERP) and Neuropsychological Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atiyah Ali ◽  
Tahamina Begum ◽  
Faruque Reza ◽  
Wan Rosilawati Wan Rosli ◽  
Wan Nor Azlen Wan Mohamad
Keyword(s):  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Auditory Event ◽  
Cognitive Improvement ◽  
Neuropsychological Study

N2 event-related potential correlates of response inhibition in an auditory Go/Nogo task

2006 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Kaiser ◽  
Oliver Weiss ◽  
Holger Hill ◽  
Jaana Markela-Lerenc ◽  
Markus Kiefer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Inhibition ◽  
Event Related Potential

Serotonin Dysfunction and Suicide Attempts in Major Depressives: An Auditory Event-Related Potential Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tai-Jui Chen ◽  
Younger W.-Y. Yu ◽  
Ming-Chao Chen ◽  
Shing-Yaw Wang ◽  
Shih-Jen Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Suicide Attempts ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Auditory Event ◽  
Potential Study

Working memory demand of a task modulates bilingual advantage in executive functions

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Jiao ◽  
Cong Liu ◽  
Ruiming Wang ◽  
Baoguo Chen
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Response Inhibition ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Flanker Task ◽  
Interference Suppression ◽  
Memory Processing ◽  
Bilingual Advantage ◽  
Processing Demand ◽  
Memory Experiment ◽  
Storage Demand

Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the effect of task demand in working memory on bilingual cognitive advantage (interference suppression and response inhibition) in young bilinguals. Methodology: Experiment 1 was performed with the flanker, Go/No-go, and modified flanker tasks, in which the first two tasks were involved in lower storage demand of working memory and the last task was involved in higher storage demand of working memory. Experiment 2 was performed with the Conditional-Go/No-go task, with a higher processing demand of working memory. Data and analysis: Reaction time and accuracy data were analyzed using a repeated measures analysis of variance. Findings/Conclusions: In Experiment 1, results showed that compared to monolinguals, the bilingual advantage in interference suppression occurred in the task with high storage demand (i.e., modified flanker task) and not in the low demand task (i.e., flanker task); however, this advantage effect was not observed in response inhibition. In Experiment 2, with the increasing working memory processing demand of tasks, the bilingual advantage in response inhibition was observed. Originality: The current study firstly examined the effect of task working memory demand on the bilingual advantage and provided some restrictive conditions for the advantage. Significance/Implications: Our results provide new evidence to support the effect of bilingual cognitive advantage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document