scholarly journals Scoring System Approach for Assessment of Critical Illness using Mobile Phones

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 341-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karupothula Madhavi Latha
Keyword(s):  
Critical Illness ◽  
Mobile Phones ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
System Approach

A simplified critical illness severity scoring system (CISSS): Development and internal validation

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spyridon Fortis ◽  
Amy M.J. O'Shea ◽  
Brice F. Beck MAE ◽  
Rajeshwari Nair ◽  
Michihiko Goto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Illness ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Illness Severity ◽  
Internal Validation ◽  
Severity Scoring

An automated computerized critical illness severity scoring system derived from APACHE III: modified APACHE

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 237-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spyridon Fortis ◽  
Amy M.J. O'Shea ◽  
Brice F. Beck ◽  
Rajeshwari Nair ◽  
Michihiko Goto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Illness ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Illness Severity ◽  
Severity Scoring ◽  
Apache Iii

Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Feeding Intolerance in Critical Illness: Do We Need an Objective Scoring System?

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. McClave ◽  
Jill Gualdoni ◽  
Annie Nagengast ◽  
Luis S. Marsano ◽  
Kathryn Bandy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Illness ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Feeding Intolerance ◽  
Gastrointestinal Dysfunction

An Investigation of the Assumptions Underlying the Scoring System of the Arizona Articulation Proficiency Scale: Revised

1979 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 241-245
Author(s):  
Richard J. Schissel ◽  
Linda B. James
Keyword(s):  
Scoring System ◽  
Frequency Of Occurrence

This study examines the assumptions underlying the scoring system of the Arizona Articulation Proficiency Scale: Revised. Twenty-one children between the ages of four years two months and six years 11 months were administered the Arizona Articulation Proficiency Scale: Revised and the Screening Deep Test of Articulation. The subjects' performance on the two tests was compared for the phones: [s], [l], [r], [t∫], [θ], [∫], [k], [f], and [t]. Results suggested that 1) the production of most sounds in only two contexts does not necessarily reflect the accuracy of production of those sounds in other contexts, and 2) for the sounds tested, the weightings assigned on the basis of their frequency of occurrence rather than the frequency with which they were misarticulated overestimated the extent of many articulation errors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document