scholarly journals Is the SIOP-2001 Classification of Renal Tumors of Childhood accurate with regard to prognosis? A problem revisited

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 684-689
Author(s):  
Jerzy Niedzielski ◽  
Katarzyna Taran ◽  
Wojciech Młynarski ◽  
Anna Sitkiewicz
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 26-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hemamali Samaratunga ◽  
Troy Gianduzzo ◽  
Brett Delahunt

There have been significant changes in the staging, classification and grading of renal cell neoplasia in recent times. Major changes have occurred in our understanding of extra-renal extension by renal cell cancer and how gross specimens must be handled to optimally display extra-renal spread. Since the 1981 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal tumors, in which only a handful of different entities were reported, many new morphological types have been described in the literature, resulting in 50 different entities reported in the 2004 WHO classification. Since 2004, further new entities have been recognized and reported necessitating an update of the renal tumor classification. There have also been numerous grading systems for renal cell carcinoma with Fuhrman grading, the most widely used system. In recent times, the prognostic value and the applicability of the Fuhrman grading system in practice has been shown to be, at best, suboptimal. To address these issues and to recommend reporting guidelines, the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) undertook a review of adult renal neoplasia through an international consensus conference in Vancouver in 2012. The conduct of the conference was based upon evidence from the literature and the current practice amongst recognized experts in the field. Working groups selected to deal with key topics evaluated current data and identified points of controversy. A pre-meeting survey of the ISUP membership was followed by the consensus conference at which a formal ballot was taken on each key issue. A 65% majority vote was taken as consensus. This review summarizes the outcome and recommendations of this conference with regards to staging, classification and grading of renal cell neoplasia.


2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bruce Beckwith
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 687-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddie Fridman ◽  
Zohar Dotan ◽  
Iris Barshack ◽  
Miriam Ben David ◽  
Avital Dov ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 745-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albino Eccher ◽  
Luigino Boschiero ◽  
Brett Delahunt ◽  
Luca Cima ◽  
Francesca Fior ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey N. Schuetz ◽  
Qiqin Yin-Goen ◽  
Mahul B. Amin ◽  
Carlos S. Moreno ◽  
Cynthia Cohen ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ondřej Hes ◽  
Eva Maria Compérat ◽  
Nathalia Rioux-Leclercq ◽  
Naoto Kuroda

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 913-917
Author(s):  
Vinita Agrawal ◽  
Zafar Neyaz ◽  
Rakesh Kapoor

Thyroid-like follicular carcinoma of kidney (TLFCK) is a morphological subtype of renal cell carcinoma, which is included as an emerging/provisional entity in the classification of renal tumors, with only about 40 cases reported in literature. It has a distinct histological appearance and immunohistochemical profile as compared with other renal cell cancers. However, these tumors, while appearing distinctive, have not been characterized fully either morphologically or by ancillary techniques. The reported cases show variable demographical and clinical features. Most are indolent, while some present with metastasis. The histological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural features of a case of TLFCK with clusters of oncocytic cells and pseudosarcomatous stroma are presented. Follow-up of 5 years was uneventful. A review of literature to analyze features in metastatic as compared with non-metastatic TLFCK is discussed. We report a patient of TLFCK and compare the clinicopathological features of metastatic and non-metastatic tumors.


2002 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordan M. Vujani? ◽  
Bengt Sandstedt ◽  
Dieter Harms ◽  
Anna Kelsey ◽  
Ivo Leuschner ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document