scholarly journals Anticoagulant Rodenticides: Resistance and Residues in Norway Rats in France

Author(s):  
Philippe , J. Berny ◽  
Isabelle Fourel ◽  
V. Lattard
1995 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger J. Quy ◽  
David P. Cowan ◽  
Colin V. Prescott ◽  
J. Erica Gill ◽  
Gerard M. Kerins ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 87 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. W. Witmer ◽  
P. W. Burke

Rodents introduced to islands have caused the extinction of many species of animals. Anticoagulant rodenticides are relied on to eradicate rodents from these islands, but if the rodents are eating plant materials that contain high amounts of vitamin K (the antidote to anticoagulants) anticoagulant rodenticides may not be effective. In a laboratory trial, individually caged Norway Rats Rattus norvegicus, Black Rats R. rattus and House Mice Mus musculus were fed fresh plant material high in vitamin K (Collards [0.62 mg vitamin K per 100 g] and Brussels Sprouts [0.19 mg vitamin K per 100 g]) for a period of 7 days. When presented later with anticoagulant rodenticides (0.0025% brodifacoum pellets or 0.005% diphacinone pellets) along with the diet of plant material, 94% of the rodents died. We conclude from this study that the presence of green feed rich in vitamin K does not reduce the effectiveness of anticoagulant rodenticides. However, we add a word of caution on one of the findings of our study. While we think the low efficacy (75%) we found in the case of brodifacoum and Black Rats was probably an artifact of small sample size in that treatment group, the result warrants further investigation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (11) ◽  
pp. 2555-2560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohui Ma ◽  
Dawei Wang ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Lan Liu ◽  
Lin Tian ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura A. Kwasnoski ◽  
Kristina A. Dudus ◽  
Allen M. Fish ◽  
Emily V. Abernathy ◽  
Christopher W. Briggs

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Kettler ◽  
Manon K. Schweinfurth ◽  
Michael Taborsky

AbstractDirect reciprocity, where individuals apply the decision rule ‘help someone who has helped you’, is believed to be rare in non-human animals due to its high cognitive demands. Especially if previous encounters with several partners need to be correctly remembered, animals might either stop reciprocating favours previously received from an individual, or switch to the simpler generalized reciprocity mechanism. Here we tested the decision rules Norway rats apply when interacting with multiple partners before being able to return received help. In a sequential prisoner’s dilemma situation, focal subjects encountered four different partners that were either helpful or not, on four consecutive days. On the fifth day, the focal subject was paired with one of the previous four partners and given the opportunity to provide it with food. The focal rats returned received help by closely matching the quantity of help their partner had previously provided, independently of the time delay between received and given help, and independently of the ultimate interaction preceding the test. This shows that direct reciprocity is not limited to dyadic situations in Norway rats, suggesting that cognitive demands involved in applying the required decision rules can be met by non-human animals even when they interact with multiple partners differing in helping propensity.


2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Fülöp ◽  
Wenguang Feng ◽  
Dongqi Xing ◽  
Kai He ◽  
László G. Nőt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document