Discussion:Microstructural Observations on the Sulfide Stress Cracking of Low Alloy Steel Tubulars

CORROSION ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 40 (10) ◽  
pp. 517-517
Author(s):  
B. E. Blanchard
Keyword(s):  
Alloy Steel ◽  
Low Alloy Steel ◽  
Stress Cracking ◽  
Sulfide Stress ◽  
Sulfide Stress Cracking

Effect of Buffer System on the Sulfide Stress Cracking Susceptibility of Low-Alloy Steel

CORROSION ◽  
10.5006/2626 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 788-800
Author(s):  
Kenji Kobayashi ◽  
Tomohiko Omura ◽  
Hisashi Amaya
Keyword(s):  
Partial Pressure ◽  
Buffer System ◽  
Low Alloy Steel ◽  
High Co2 ◽  
Co2 Partial Pressure ◽  
Stress Cracking ◽  
Test Conditions ◽  
Sulfide Stress ◽  
Ratio Condition ◽  
Sulfide Stress Cracking

The effects of a buffer system in test solution and CO2 partial pressure on sulfide stress cracking (SSC) susceptibility of low-alloy steel were investigated under pH 4.0 at 0.03 MPa H2S partial pressure. A double cantilever beam test was used to quantitatively evaluate SSC susceptibility. The corrosion rates and absorbed diffusible hydrogen concentration were also evaluated. Acetic acid/sodium acetate (acetate buffered solution) and carbonic acid/bicarbonate (bicarbonate buffered solution) buffered solutions were used as buffer systems in this study. From the results, in atmospheric pressure tests, KISSC values in bicarbonate buffered solutions were equivalent to or lower than those in acetate buffered solutions. In high CO2 partial pressure conditions, KISSC values in bicarbonate buffered solutions were much higher than those in acetate buffered solutions. At a high CO2 partial pressure and H2S partial pressure (pCO2/pH2S) ratio condition, hydrogen entry is considered to be greatly prevented by corrosion products probably containing amorphous iron carbonate. Presence of the corrosion product with high protectiveness produced in the high pCO2/pH2S ratio condition suggests the possibility that conventional test conditions using acetate buffered solutions are conservative or are equivalent test conditions for actual field conditions.

scholarly journals Comparison of 2507 Duplex and 28 % Cr- Austenitic Stainless Steel Corrosion Behavior for High Pressure and High Temperature (HPHT) in Sour Service Condition with C-ring Experiment

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harris Prabowo ◽  
Badrul Munir ◽  
Yudha Pratesa ◽  
Johny W. Soedarsono
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
High Temperature ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Corrosion Behavior ◽  
Material Selection ◽  
Stress Cracking ◽  
Sulfide Stress ◽  
Sulfide Stress Cracking ◽  
Sour Service

The scarcity of oil and gas resources made High Pressure and High Temperature (HPHT) reservoir attractive to be developed. The sour service environment gives an additional factor in material selection for HPHT reservoir. Austenitic 28 Cr and super duplex stainless steel 2507 (SS 2507) are proposed to be a potential materials candidate for such conditions. C-ring tests were performed to investigate their corrosion behavior, specifically sulfide stress cracking (SSC) and sulfide stress cracking susceptibility. The C-ring tests were done under 2.55 % H2S (31.48 psia) and 50 % CO2 (617.25 psia). The testing was done in static environment conditions. Regardless of good SSC resistance for both materials, different pitting resistance is seen in both materials. The pitting resistance did not follow the general Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN), since SS 2507 super duplex (PREN > 40) has more pitting density than 28 Cr austenitic stainless steel (PREN < 40). SS 2507 super duplex pit shape tends to be larger but shallower than 28 Cr austenitic stainless steel. 28 Cr austenitic stainless steel has a smaller pit density, yet deeper and isolated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document