scholarly journals Seismic hazard assessment in the Northern Andes (PILOTO Project)

1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Dimaté ◽  
L. Drake ◽  
H. Yepez ◽  
L. Ocola ◽  
H. Rendon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Test Area ◽  
Exceedance Probability ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Earthquake Catalogues ◽  
Andean Countries ◽  
Program Test

Five Andean countries (Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela) and four European countries (Italy, Spain, Holland, Germany) cooperated in the PILOTO program ("Test area for earthquake monitoring and seismic hazard assessment"), launched under GSHAP and sponsored by the European Union (Ct.94-0103) to produce a unified SHA for the Andean region. Activities included the integration of national earthquake catalogues and source zonings in common regional databases and joint technical workshops for the assessment of the regional hazard, expressed in terms of expected peak ground acceleration with 10% exceedance probability in 50 years.

scholarly journals Seismic hazard of Northern Eurasia

1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
V. I. Ulomov ◽  
. The GSHAP Region Working Group
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Exceedance Probability ◽  
Hazard Mapping ◽  
Northern Eurasia ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Border Regions ◽  
Seismic Catalogue ◽  
Close Cooperation

The GSHAP Regional Centre in Moscow, UIPE, has coordinated the seismic hazard mapping for the whole territory of the former U.S.S.R. and border regions. A five-year program was conducted to assemble for the whole area, subdivided in five overlapping blocks, the unified seismic catalogue with uniform magnitude, the strong motion databank and the seismic zones model (lineament-domain-source), which form the basis of a newly developed deterministic-probabilistic computation of seismic hazard assessment. The work was conducted in close cooperation with border regions and GSHAP regional centers. The hazard was originally computed in terms of expected MSK intensity and then transformed into expected peak ground acceleration with 10% exceedance probability in 50 years.

scholarly journals SEISMIC HAZARD ESTIMATION IN STABLE CONTINENTAL REGIONS: DOES PSHA MEET THE NEEDS FOR MODERN ENGINEERING DESIGN IN AUSTRALIA?

2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trevor I. Allen
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Analysis ◽  
Ground Motions ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Earthquake Hazard ◽  
Exceedance Probability ◽  
Earthquake Catalogues ◽  
Seismic Safety ◽  
Seismic Demands ◽  
Almost All

Damaging earthquakes in Australia and other regions characterised by low seismicity are considered low probability but high consequence events. Uncertainties in modelling earthquake occurrence rates and ground motions for damaging earthquakes in these regions pose unique challenges to forecasting seismic hazard, including the use of this information as a reliable benchmark to improve seismic safety within our communities. Key challenges for assessing seismic hazards in these regions are explored, including: the completeness and continuity of earthquake catalogues; the identification and characterisation of neotectonic faults; the difficulties in characterising earthquake ground motions; the uncertainties in earthquake source modelling, and; the use of modern earthquake hazard information to support the development of future building provisions. Geoscience Australia recently released its 2018 National Seismic Hazard Assessment (NSHA18). Results from the NSHA18 indicate significantly lower seismic hazard across almost all Australian localities at the 1/500 annual exceedance probability level relative to the factors adopted for the current Australian Standard AS1170.4–2007 (R2018). These new hazard estimates have challenged notions of seismic hazard in Australia in terms of the recurrence of damaging ground motions. This raises the question of whether current practices in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) deliver the outcomes required to protect communities and infrastructure assets in low-seismicity regions, such as Australia. This manuscript explores a range of measures that could be undertaken to update and modernise the Australian earthquake loading standard, in the context of these modern seismic hazard estimates, including the use of alternate ground-motion exceedance probabilities for assigning seismic demands for ordinary-use structures. The estimation of seismic hazard at any location is an uncertain science, particularly in low-seismicity regions. However, as our knowledge of the physical characteristics of earthquakes improve, our estimates of the hazard will converge more closely to the actual – but unknowable – (time independent) hazard. Understanding the uncertainties in the estimation of seismic hazard is also of key importance, and new software and approaches allow hazard modellers to better understand and quantify this uncertainty. It is therefore prudent to regularly update the estimates of the seismic demands in our building codes using the best available evidence-based methods and models.

scholarly journals The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map

1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Giardini ◽  
G. Grünthal ◽  
K. M. Shedlock ◽  
P. Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Hazard Map ◽  
Disaster Reduction ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Assessment Program ◽  
Global Standards ◽  
Seismic Hazard Map ◽  
International Decade

The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP), a demonstration project of the UN/International Decade of Natural Disaster Reduction, was conducted in the 1992-1998 period with the goal of improving global standards in seismic hazard assessment. The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map has been compiled by joining the regional maps produced for different GSHAP regions and test areas; it depicts the global seismic hazard as Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) with a 10% chance of exceedance in 50 years, corresponding to a return period of 475 years.

scholarly journals Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in Greece – Part 1: Engineering ground motion parameters

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
G-A. Tselentis ◽  
L. Danciu
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Peak Ground Acceleration ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Peak Ground Velocity ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard ◽  
Arias Intensity ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Cumulative Absolute Velocity

Abstract. Seismic hazard assessment represents a basic tool for rational planning and designing in seismic prone areas. In the present study, a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in terms of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, Arias intensity and cumulative absolute velocity computed with a 0.05 g acceleration threshold, has been carried out for Greece. The output of the hazard computation produced probabilistic hazard maps for all the above parameters estimated for a fixed return period of 475 years. From these maps the estimated values are reported for 52 Greek municipalities. Additionally, we have obtained a set of probabilistic maps of engineering significance: a probabilistic macroseismic intensity map, depicting the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale obtained from the estimated peak ground velocity and a probabilistic seismic-landslide map based on a simplified conversion of the estimated Arias intensity and peak ground acceleration into Newmark's displacement.

scholarly journals Revisiting Seismic Hazard Assessment For Peninsular Malaysia Using Deterministic And Probabilistic Approaches

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Weijie Loi ◽  
Mavinakere Eshwaraiah Raghunandan ◽  
Varghese Swamy
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
B Value ◽  
Peninsular Malaysia ◽  
Point Sources ◽  
Potential Hazard ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Proximity Potential ◽  
Source Models

Abstract. Seismic hazard assessments – both deterministic and probabilistic, for Peninsular Malaysia have been carried out using peak ground acceleration (PGA) data recorded between 2004 and 2016 by the Malaysian Meteorological Department – using triaxial accelerometers placed at 19 seismic stations within the peninsula and monitored. Seismicity source modelling for the deterministic seismic hazard assessment (DSHA) used historical point sources whereas in the probabilistic (PSHA) approach, line and areal sources were used. The earthquake sources comprised the Sumatran Subduction Zone (SSZ), Sumatran Fault Zone (SFZ), and local intraplate (LI) faults. Gutenberg–Richter law b-value for the various zones identified within the SSZ ranged between 0.56 and 1.06 (mean = 0.83) and that for the zones within SFZ, between 0.53 and 1.13 (mean = 0.84). Suitable ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for Peninsular Malaysia along with other pertinent information were used for constructing a logic tree for PSHA of the region. The DSHA critical-worst scenario suggests PGAs of 0.07–0.80 ms−2, whilst the PSHA suggests mean PGAs of 0.06–0.42 ms−2 and 0.12–0.70 ms−2 at 10 % and 2 % probability of exceedance in 50 years, respectively. Both DSHA and PSHA, despite using different source models and methodologies, conclude that the central-western cities of Peninsular Malaysia located between 2° N and 4° N are most susceptible to high PGAs due to neighbouring active Sumatran sources SFZ and SSZ. Surprisingly, the relatively less active SFZ source with low magnitude seismicity appeared as the major contributor, due to its close proximity. Potential hazard due to SSZ mega-earthquakes should not be dismissed, however. Finally, DSHA performed using the limited intraplate seismic data from the Bukit Tinggi (LI) fault at a reasonable Mw 5.0 predicted a PGA of ~ 0.40 ms−2 at Kuala Lumpur.

scholarly journals ANALISA KURVA HAZARD PADA KABUPATEN TAMBRAUW DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN BEBERAPA FUNGSI ATENUASI

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilis Fitri Handayani ◽  
Serly Marlina
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Line Source ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Source Method ◽  
Hazard Curve ◽  
Papua Barat

Kabupaten Tambrauw adalah salah satu kabupaten di Provinsi Papua Barat, Indonesia. Pusat pemerintahan berada di Fef. Kabupaten Tambrauw mempunyai luas wilayah 11 529,19 Km², yang terdiri dari daratan dan lautan. Secara geografis Kabupaten Tambrauw pada sebelah Utara berbatasan dengan Samudera Pasifik, sebelah Selatan berbatasan dengan Kabupaten Sorong Selatan dan sebelah Timur berbatasan dengan Distrik Sidey dan Kabupaten Manokwari. Ada beberapa metode yang dapat digunakan dalam Seismic Hazard Assessment untuk membuat prediksi kejadian gempa di masa yang akan datang (gempa rencana). Pada analisa ini, Seismic Hazard Assessment menggunakan The Line Source Method untuk membuat Hazard curve yang dapat memperkirakan kejadian gempa di Kabupaten Tambrauw. Kurva hazard dibuat menggunakan fungsi atenuasi Esteva (1970), fungsi Atenuasi Hou & Hu (1991), fungsi Atenuasi Ambraseys (1995) dan fungsi Atenuasi Crouse-Mc Guirre (1996). Hasil analisa menunjukkan besarnya nilai percepatan tanah (ground acceleration) akan semakin mengecil pada jarak atau radius yang semakin jauh. Analisis kurva hazard pada daerah Kabupaten Tambrauw akibat pergeseran lempeng akan menunjukkan nilai terbesar pada saat menggunakan fungsi atenuasi Hou & Hu (1991) dan analisis kurva hazard pada daerah Kabupaten Tambrauw akibat pergeseran lempeng akan menunjukkan nilai terkecil pada saat menggunakan fungsi atenuasi Crouse-McGuirre (1996), F = 0.

scholarly journals Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, considering empirically estimated site effects

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahid Ullah ◽  
Dino Bindi ◽  
Marco Pilz ◽  
Stefano Parolai
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Site Effects ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Geological Structure ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Site Classification ◽  
Ground Acceleration

<p>It is well known that variability in the surface geology potentially leads to the modification of earthquake-induced ground motion over short distances. Although this effect is of major importance when seismic hazard is assessed at the urban level, it is very often not appropriately accounted for. In this paper, we present a first attempt at taking into account the influence of the shallow geological structure on the seismic hazard assessment for Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, using a proxy (Vs30) that has been estimated from in situ seismic noise array analyses, and considering response spectral ratios calculated by analyzing a series of earthquake recordings of a temporary seismic network. To highlight the spatial variability of the observed ground motion, the obtained results are compared with those estimated assuming a homogeneous Vs30 value over the whole urban area. The seismic hazard is evaluated in terms of peak ground acceleration (PGA) and spectral acceleration (SA) at different periods (frequencies). The presented results consider the values obtained for a 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years. The largest SA estimated considering a rock site classification of the area (0.43 g) is observed for a period of 0.1 s (10 Hz), while the maximum PGA reaches 0.21 g. When site effects are included through the Vs30 proxy in the seismic hazard calculation, the largest SA, 0.67 g, is obtained for a period of 0.3 s (about 3.3 Hz). In terms of PGA, in this case the largest estimated value reaches 0.31 g in the northern part of the town. When the variability of ground motion is accounted for through response spectrum ratios, the largest SA reaches a value as high as 1.39 g at a period of 0.5 s. In general, considering site effects in the seismic hazard assessment of Bishkek leads to an increase of seismic hazard in the north of the city, which is thus identified as the most hazardous part within the study area and which is more far away from the faults.</p>

scholarly journals Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment (PSHA) for Lesvos Island Using the Logic Tree Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Vavlas ◽  
Anastasia Kiratzi ◽  
Basil Margaris ◽  
George Karakaisis
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
High Efficiency ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Aegean Sea ◽  
Peak Ground Velocity ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard ◽  
Building Stock ◽  
Ground Acceleration

We carry out a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA) for Lesvos Island, in the northeastern Aegean Sea. Being the most populated island in the northern Aegean Sea and hosting the capital of the prefecture, its seismic potential has significant social-economic meaning. For the seismic hazard estimation, the newest version of the R-CRISIS module, which has high efficiency and flexibility in model selection, is used. We incorporate into the calculations eight (8) ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs). The measures used are peak ground acceleration, (PGA), peak ground velocity, (PGV), and spectral acceleration, (SA), at T=0.2 sec representative of the building stock. We calculate hazard curves for selected sites on the island, sampling the southern and northern parts: Mytilene, the capital, the village of Vrisa, Mithymna and Sigri. Hazard maps are also presented in terms of all three intensity measures, for a mean return period of 475 years (or 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years), assuming a Poisson process. Our results are comparable to the predictions of on-going EU hazard models, but higher than the provisions of the Greek Seismic Code. Finally, we perform disaggregation of hazard to depict the relative contribution of different earthquake sources and magnitudes to the results.

scholarly journals Seismic hazard assessment for the Caucasus test area

1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Balassanian ◽  
T. Ashirov ◽  
T. Chelidze ◽  
A. Gassanov ◽  
N. Kondorskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
Seismic Source ◽  
Test Area ◽  
The Caucasus ◽  
Seismicity Rate ◽  
Seismic Catalogue ◽  
Seismic Source Models ◽  
Source Models

The GSHAP CAUCAS test area was established under the INTAS Ct.94-1644 (Test Area for sismic Hazard Assessment in the Caucasus) and NATO ARW Ct.95-1521 (Historical and Prehistorical Earthquakes in the Caucasus), with the initial support of IASPEI, UNESCO and ILP. The high tectonic interest and seismicity rate of the whole area, the availability of abundant multi-disciplinary data and the long established tradition in hazard assessment provide a unique opportunity to test different methodologies in a common test area and attempt to establish some consensus in the scientific community. Starting from the same input data (historical and instrumental seismic catalogue, lineament and homogeneous seismic source models) six independent approaches to seismic hazard assessment have been used, ranging from pure historical deterministic to seismotectonic probabilistic and areal assessment methodologies. The results are here compared.

Crustal strain and seismic hazard of the NE Tibetan Plateau

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Ou ◽  
Simon Daout ◽  
Chris Rollins ◽  
Jonathan Weiss ◽  
Barry Parsons
Keyword(s):  
Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Seismic Hazard ◽  
Strain Rate ◽  
Hazard Assessment ◽  
Release Rate ◽  
Seismic Hazard Assessment ◽  
B Value ◽  
Earthquake Catalogues ◽  
Seismic Moment Release ◽  
Ne Tibetan Plateau

&lt;p&gt;Seismic hazard assessment for the NE Tibetan Plateau is of paramount importance because of the growing population density and the accelerated communication and trade activities along the rejuvenated Ancient Silk Road, following the Belt and Road Initiative, and the opening of the high speed railways. Previous-generation seismic hazard assessments were largely based on earthquake catalogues which are shorter than typical earthquake cycles and are temporally and spatially incomplete. This is exacerbated by the fact that magnitudes of many historical Chinese earthquakes are overestimated. In this study, we present new earthquake rate estimates for the NE Tibetan Plateau derived from both an InSAR strain rate map and a re-estimated magnitude of the 1920 Haiyuan Earthquake. First, we obtain a ~100 m resolution strain rate map from five years of Sentinel-1 InSAR data covering an area of 439254 km2 which shows strain concentrated along the Haiyuan and East Kunlun Faults and distributed across the Qilian thrusts and the West Qingling Fault. Second, the magnitude of the Haiyuan Earthquake has been re-estimated to Mw 7.9 &amp;#177; 0.2 using both historical seismograms and offset measurements. Taking the total moment release rate given by the strain rate map and the magnitude of the 1920 Haiyuan Earthquake as the largest magnitude in the Gutenberg-Richter relationship, we generate rate-balancing frequency-magnitude models with different b values and percentages of seismic moment release. Comparing our models against four earthquake catalogues covering different periods and magnitude ranges suggests the following: (1) With a b value of 1 and 75% seismic moment release, the calculated relationship fits well the International Seismological Centre - Global Earthquakes Catalogue (ISC-GEM, 97 years) catalogue in the range Mw&gt;6.5, but overestimates all other catalogues not containing the Haiyuan Earthquake; (2) keeping a b value of 1 and in order to fit the Global Centroid Moment Tensor Catalogue (GCMT, 34 years), the China Earthquake Networks Center Catalogue (CENC, 12 years) and the China Historical Strong Earthquakes Catalogue (CHSEC, 411 years), a low seismic release rate of 30% would be required; the resultant relationship also fits the ISC-GEM catalogue excluding the Haiyuan Earthquake and its aftershocks; (3) to fit all of the catalogues, it is necessary to reduce the b value to 0.7, in which case only 25% aseismic moment release would be required, giving confidence that Mw 7.9 &amp;#177; 0.2 is likely the largest magnitude required to balance the tectonic strain in the NE Tibetan Plateau. This study highlights the dominating strain release by, and the effect on the b value of, the largest earthquake and demonstrates the advantage of combining tectonic strain and earthquake catalogues for seismic hazard assessment.&lt;/p&gt;

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document