scholarly journals The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map

1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Giardini ◽  
G. Grünthal ◽  
K. M. Shedlock ◽  
P. Zhang

The Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP), a demonstration project of the UN/International Decade of Natural Disaster Reduction, was conducted in the 1992-1998 period with the goal of improving global standards in seismic hazard assessment. The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map has been compiled by joining the regional maps produced for different GSHAP regions and test areas; it depicts the global seismic hazard as Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) with a 10% chance of exceedance in 50 years, corresponding to a return period of 475 years.

2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurentiu Danciu ◽  
Domenico Giardini

<p>Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program - or simply GSHAP, when launched, almost two decades ago, aimed at establishing a common framework to evaluate the seismic hazard over geographical large-scales, i.e. countries, regions, continents and finally the globe. Its main product, the global seismic hazard map was a milestone, unique at that time and for a decade have served as the main reference worldwide. Today, for most of the Earth’s seismically active regions such Europe, Northern and Southern America, Central and South-East Asia, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, the GSHAP seismic hazard map is outdated. The rapid increase of the new data, advance on the earthquake process knowledge, technological progress, both hardware and software, contributed all in updates of the seismic hazard models. We present herein, a short retrospective overview of the achievements as well as the pitfalls of the GSHAP. Further, we describe the next generation of seismic hazard models, as elaborated within the Global Earthquake Model, regional programs: the 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model, the 2014 Earthquake Model for Middle East, and the 2015 Earthquake Model of Central Asia. Later, the main characteristics of these regional models are summarized and the new datasets fully harmonized across national borders are illustrated for the first time after the GSHAP completion.</p>


1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Giardini

The United Nations, recognizing natural disasters as a major threat to human life and development, designed the 1990-1999 period as the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (UN/IDNDR; UN Res. 42/169/ 1987). Among the IDNDR Demonstration Projects is the Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP), launched in 1992 by the International Lithosphere Program (ILP) and implemented in the 1992-1999 period. In order to mitigate the risk associated to the recurrence of earthquakes, the GSHAP promoted a regionally coordinated, homogeneous approach to seismic hazard evaluation. To achieve a global dimension, the GSHAP established initially a mosaic of regions and multinational test areas, then expanded to cover whole continents and finally the globe. The GSHAP Global Map of Seismic Hazard integrates the results obtained in the regional areas and depicts Peak-Ground-Acceleration (PGA) with 10% chance of exceedance in 50 years, corresponding to a return period of 475 years. All regional results and the Global Map of Seismic Hazard are published in 1999 and available on the GSHAP homepage on http://seismo.ethz.ch/GSHAP/.


1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Grunthal ◽  
The GSHAP Region Working Group

The activities of the Regional Centre 3 of the Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP) covering Europe north of 46°N and west of 32°E are summarized starting with the establishment of the GSHAP Centre at the GFZ Potsdam in 1993 and leading finally in the calculation and creation of the GSHAP seismic hazard map in terms of horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA). Moreover, the activities of separate working groups which contribute with their results for certain parts of the study area to the final product of the Regional Centre are described. Details are given on the development of the homogeneous seismicity working file, the delineation of seismic source zones, the data preprocessing as well as on the chosen PGA-attenuation relations.


Terra Nova ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 623-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Giardini ◽  
P. Basham ◽  
M. Bery

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
G-A. Tselentis ◽  
L. Danciu

Abstract. Seismic hazard assessment represents a basic tool for rational planning and designing in seismic prone areas. In the present study, a probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in terms of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, Arias intensity and cumulative absolute velocity computed with a 0.05 g acceleration threshold, has been carried out for Greece. The output of the hazard computation produced probabilistic hazard maps for all the above parameters estimated for a fixed return period of 475 years. From these maps the estimated values are reported for 52 Greek municipalities. Additionally, we have obtained a set of probabilistic maps of engineering significance: a probabilistic macroseismic intensity map, depicting the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale obtained from the estimated peak ground velocity and a probabilistic seismic-landslide map based on a simplified conversion of the estimated Arias intensity and peak ground acceleration into Newmark's displacement.


2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 881-887 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Simeonova ◽  
D. E. Solakov ◽  
G. Leydecker ◽  
H. Busche ◽  
T. Schmitt ◽  
...  

Abstract. A seismic hazard map proposed as part of a new building code for Bulgaria is presented here on basis of the recommendations in EUROCODE 8. Seismic source zones within an area of about 200 km around Bulgaria were constructed considering seismicity, neotectonic and geological development. The most time consuming work was to establish a homogeneous earthquake catalogue out of different catalogues. The probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in terms of intensities is performed following Cornell (1968) with the program EQRISK (see McGuire, 1976), modified by us for use of intensities. To cope with the irregular isoseismals of the Vrancea intermediate depth earthquakes a special attenuation factor is introduced (Ardeleanu et al., 2005), using detailed macroseismic maps of three major earthquakes. The final seismic hazard is the combination of both contributions, of zones with crustal earthquakes and of the Vrancea intermediate depth earthquakes zone. Calculations are done for recurrence periods of 95, 475 and 10 000 years.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Weijie Loi ◽  
Mavinakere Eshwaraiah Raghunandan ◽  
Varghese Swamy

Abstract. Seismic hazard assessments – both deterministic and probabilistic, for Peninsular Malaysia have been carried out using peak ground acceleration (PGA) data recorded between 2004 and 2016 by the Malaysian Meteorological Department – using triaxial accelerometers placed at 19 seismic stations within the peninsula and monitored. Seismicity source modelling for the deterministic seismic hazard assessment (DSHA) used historical point sources whereas in the probabilistic (PSHA) approach, line and areal sources were used. The earthquake sources comprised the Sumatran Subduction Zone (SSZ), Sumatran Fault Zone (SFZ), and local intraplate (LI) faults. Gutenberg–Richter law b-value for the various zones identified within the SSZ ranged between 0.56 and 1.06 (mean = 0.83) and that for the zones within SFZ, between 0.53 and 1.13 (mean = 0.84). Suitable ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for Peninsular Malaysia along with other pertinent information were used for constructing a logic tree for PSHA of the region. The DSHA critical-worst scenario suggests PGAs of 0.07–0.80 ms−2, whilst the PSHA suggests mean PGAs of 0.06–0.42 ms−2 and 0.12–0.70 ms−2 at 10 % and 2 % probability of exceedance in 50 years, respectively. Both DSHA and PSHA, despite using different source models and methodologies, conclude that the central-western cities of Peninsular Malaysia located between 2° N and 4° N are most susceptible to high PGAs due to neighbouring active Sumatran sources SFZ and SSZ. Surprisingly, the relatively less active SFZ source with low magnitude seismicity appeared as the major contributor, due to its close proximity. Potential hazard due to SSZ mega-earthquakes should not be dismissed, however. Finally, DSHA performed using the limited intraplate seismic data from the Bukit Tinggi (LI) fault at a reasonable Mw 5.0 predicted a PGA of ~ 0.40 ms−2 at Kuala Lumpur.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilis Fitri Handayani ◽  
Serly Marlina

Kabupaten Tambrauw adalah salah satu kabupaten di Provinsi Papua Barat, Indonesia. Pusat pemerintahan berada di Fef. Kabupaten Tambrauw mempunyai luas wilayah 11 529,19 Km², yang terdiri dari daratan dan lautan. Secara geografis Kabupaten Tambrauw pada sebelah Utara berbatasan dengan Samudera Pasifik, sebelah Selatan berbatasan dengan Kabupaten Sorong Selatan dan sebelah Timur berbatasan dengan Distrik Sidey dan Kabupaten Manokwari. Ada beberapa metode yang dapat digunakan dalam Seismic Hazard Assessment untuk membuat prediksi kejadian gempa di masa yang akan datang (gempa rencana). Pada analisa ini, Seismic Hazard Assessment menggunakan The Line Source Method untuk membuat Hazard curve yang dapat memperkirakan kejadian gempa di Kabupaten Tambrauw. Kurva hazard dibuat menggunakan fungsi atenuasi Esteva (1970), fungsi Atenuasi Hou &amp; Hu (1991), fungsi Atenuasi Ambraseys (1995) dan fungsi Atenuasi Crouse-Mc Guirre (1996). Hasil analisa menunjukkan besarnya nilai percepatan tanah (ground acceleration) akan semakin mengecil pada jarak atau radius yang semakin jauh. Analisis kurva hazard pada daerah Kabupaten Tambrauw akibat pergeseran lempeng akan menunjukkan nilai terbesar pada saat menggunakan fungsi atenuasi Hou &amp; Hu (1991) dan analisis kurva hazard pada daerah Kabupaten Tambrauw akibat pergeseran lempeng akan menunjukkan nilai terkecil pada saat menggunakan fungsi atenuasi Crouse-McGuirre (1996), F = 0.


1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Jiménez ◽  
M. García-Fernández

The contribution of the Ibero-Maghreb region to the global GSHAP map has been the result of a fruitful cooperation among the participants in the established Working Group including representatives from Algeria, Morocco, Portugal, Spain and Tunisia and coordinated by ICTJA-CSIC, Spain. For the first time, a map of regional seismic source zones is presented, and agreement on a common procedure for hazard computation in the region has been achieved. The computed Ibero-Maghreb seismic hazard map constitutes the first step towards a uniform hazard assessment for the region. Further joint regional efforts are still needed for earthquake hazard studies based on a homogeneous regional earthquake catalogue. Ongoing initiatives in relation to seismic hazard assessment in the Mediterranean should profit both from these results and the established cooperation among different groups in the region as well as contribute to future regional studies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahid Ullah ◽  
Dino Bindi ◽  
Marco Pilz ◽  
Stefano Parolai

<p>It is well known that variability in the surface geology potentially leads to the modification of earthquake-induced ground motion over short distances. Although this effect is of major importance when seismic hazard is assessed at the urban level, it is very often not appropriately accounted for. In this paper, we present a first attempt at taking into account the influence of the shallow geological structure on the seismic hazard assessment for Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, using a proxy (Vs30) that has been estimated from in situ seismic noise array analyses, and considering response spectral ratios calculated by analyzing a series of earthquake recordings of a temporary seismic network. To highlight the spatial variability of the observed ground motion, the obtained results are compared with those estimated assuming a homogeneous Vs30 value over the whole urban area. The seismic hazard is evaluated in terms of peak ground acceleration (PGA) and spectral acceleration (SA) at different periods (frequencies). The presented results consider the values obtained for a 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years. The largest SA estimated considering a rock site classification of the area (0.43 g) is observed for a period of 0.1 s (10 Hz), while the maximum PGA reaches 0.21 g. When site effects are included through the Vs30 proxy in the seismic hazard calculation, the largest SA, 0.67 g, is obtained for a period of 0.3 s (about 3.3 Hz). In terms of PGA, in this case the largest estimated value reaches 0.31 g in the northern part of the town. When the variability of ground motion is accounted for through response spectrum ratios, the largest SA reaches a value as high as 1.39 g at a period of 0.5 s. In general, considering site effects in the seismic hazard assessment of Bishkek leads to an increase of seismic hazard in the north of the city, which is thus identified as the most hazardous part within the study area and which is more far away from the faults.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document