scholarly journals Dentoalveolar compensation in different anterioposterior and vertical skeletal malocclusions

2019 ◽  
pp. e745-e753
Author(s):  
MS Alhammadi
2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
Hossein Aghili ◽  
Mahdjoube Goldani Moghadam ◽  
Fateme Torabi ◽  
Afsane Zahtabche Khuzani

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2(S)) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Bruno Di Leonardo ◽  
Luca Contardo ◽  
Riccardo Riatti

In this case report, Authors describe the correction of a class II malocclusion using only an Herbst appliance palatally anchored with miniscrews. Before sagittal correction in the same appliance we applied a palatal screw to obtain maxillary expansion. The device were removed after 12 months of treatment. The final result included the correction of Class II malocclusion by lower dentoalveolar compensation mainly. The lip function favorite the spontaneous correction of upper frontal torque with consequent improvement of facial esthetics. After a follow up of 12 months the clinical result is satisfactory in terms of occlusion and esthetics. This clinical case showed a simple orthopedic and dentoalveolar approach to correct transversal discrepancy, dental class II malocclusion and also frontal proclination only with one appliance in a very short treatment time.


Author(s):  
Maryam Maniyar ◽  
Ajit Kalia ◽  
Ashwith Hegde ◽  
Raja Ganesh Gautam ◽  
Nasim Mirdehghan

2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (5) ◽  
pp. 649-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinder Kuitert ◽  
Stefan Beckmann ◽  
Mignon van Loenen ◽  
Bram Tuinzing ◽  
Andrej Zentner

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-25
Author(s):  
A. B. Mallaeva ◽  
N. S. Drobysheva

Aim. To assess the size of the alveolar ridge / part of the jaws in patients with gnathic mesial occlusion of the dentition.Materials and methods. A study was carried out, during which we determined the structural features of the alveolar ridge of the upper and lower jaws of 50 adult patients (from 18 to 44 years old), and also studied the presence / absence of the relationship of this parameter with the inclination of the teeth.Results. The smallest thickness of the alveolar bone in the upper jaw was observed in the area of the mesio-buccal root of the first molars and in the area of the first premolars and canines. The smallest thickness of the alveolar bone in the lower jaw was observed in the area of the vestibular surface of the first and second premolars, canines and incisors. The greatest thickness of the alveolar bone is observed in the distal-buccal region of the second molars.Conclusions. A natural mechanism promotes dentoalveolar compensation, while maintaining the amount of bone in the region of the vestibular and lingual alveolar bones to maintain the integrity of the periodontium.


2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Fransiska Monika ◽  
Retno Widayati

Background: The treatment options for adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion can be dentoalveolar compensation, also known as orthodontic camouflage, or orthognathic surgery. Camouflage treatment can be carried out with teeth extractions, distalisation of the mandibular dentition, and use of Class III intermaxillary elastics. However, intermaxillary elastics as anchorage has its own risk–benefit. Purpose: To explain that camouflage treatment with teeth extractions can be performed in a mild to moderate skeletal Class III malocclusion using intermaxillary anchorage with elastics, while minimising the deleterious effects and achieving a satisfactory treatment outcome. Case: Our patient was a 25-year-old female who had a skeletal Class III pattern, with normal maxilla and a protruded mandible. She had a straight facial profile with a Class III canine and molar relationship on her right and left sides. Anterior crossbite was also present with crowding on both the maxilla and the mandible. Case Management: The treatment plan was carried out with dentoalveolar compensation by extracting teeth. Extraction of the lower first premolars was conducted to eliminate the crowding and correct the anterior crossbite. The mandibular incisors were retroclined and the maxillary incisors were proclined with dentoalveolar compensation. Passive self-ligating system was used with standard torque prescription, intermaxillary anchorage, and no additional appliances for anchorage control. Class I canine and incisor relationship were both achieved at the end of the treatment, while maintaining the Class III molar relationship. Conclusion: Orthodontic camouflage treatment in an adult patient using a passive self-ligating system and intermaxillary anchorage can improve facial profile and improve dental occlusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document