Development Status of the Metal Oxide Regenerable CO2 Removal System for the NASA EMU

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
LeRoy B. Butler ◽  
Jeffrey J. Faszcza ◽  
Gretchen A. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Metal Oxide ◽  
Co2 Removal ◽  
Development Status ◽  
Removal System

Development of a Regenerable Metal Oxide Sheet Matrix CO2 Removal System

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy A. Nalette ◽  
Thomas P. Filbum ◽  
Robert J. Cusick
Keyword(s):  
Metal Oxide ◽  
Co2 Removal ◽  
Removal System

Performance Characteristics of the Regenerable CO2 Removal System for the NASA EMU

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon F. Allen ◽  
Gail S. Baker ◽  
Timothy A. Nalette ◽  
Michael J. Mankin ◽  
Gretchen A. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Performance Characteristics ◽  
Co2 Removal ◽  
Removal System

scholarly journals Role and potentials of low-flow CO2 removal system in mechanical ventilation

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierpaolo Terragni ◽  
Giorgia Maiolo ◽  
V. Marco Ranieri
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Co2 Removal ◽  
Removal System

First Experience With a New Miniaturized Pump-Driven Venovenous Extracorporeal CO2 Removal System (iLA Activve)

ASAIO Journal ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Hermann ◽  
Thomas Staudinger ◽  
Andja Bojic ◽  
Katharina Riss ◽  
Philipp Wohlfarth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Co2 Removal ◽  
Extracorporeal Co2 Removal ◽  
Removal System

Orbiter Upgrade Activities for a Fail Safe Regenerative CO2 Removal System

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Graf ◽  
Steve Tongue ◽  
Tom Filburn ◽  
Edmund Taddey
Keyword(s):  
Co2 Removal ◽  
Fail Safe ◽  
Removal System

scholarly journals Absorption of CO2 With Amines in a Semiclosed GT Cycle: Plant Performance and Operating Costs

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Corti ◽  
L. Lombardi ◽  
G. Manfrida
Keyword(s):  
Flow Rate ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Energy Requirement ◽  
Co2 Concentration ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Plant Performance ◽  
Co2 Removal ◽  
Additional Costs ◽  
Increased Co2 Concentration ◽  
Removal System

A CO2 removal system, using aqueous solutions of amines, is applied to a Semi-Closed Gas Turbine/Combined Cycle (SCGT/CC) power plant. The SCGT/CC is interesting because of the possibility of achieving low emissions at the stack, with a decreased overall flow rate, lower NOx concentration and an increased CO2 concentration (over 15% in volume), which facilitates the removal treatment. Several compositions of the absorbing solution have been investigated, by means of simulations with ASPEN PLUS. A 18% DEA + 12% MDEA composition resulted the most convenient in terms of flow rate and energy requirement for the stripping. A cost analysis of the removal plant allows to estimate additional costs for CO2 removal with respect to conventional power plants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document