Adaptive Cruise Control for Heavy-Duty Vehicles: A Torque-Based Approach

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sorin C. Bengea ◽  
Peter B. Eyabi ◽  
Michael P. Nowak ◽  
Richard M. Avery ◽  
Robert O. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Heavy Duty Vehicles

scholarly journals Ecological Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control for a Heterogeneous Platoon of Heavy-Duty Vehicles With Time Delays

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 146208-146219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunjie Zhai ◽  
Xiyan Chen ◽  
Chenggang Yan ◽  
Yonggui Liu ◽  
Huajun Li
Keyword(s):  
Time Delays ◽  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Heavy Duty Vehicles

Spacing Control of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control for Heavy-Duty Vehicles

2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (21) ◽  
pp. 58-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manabu Omae ◽  
Ryoko Fukuda ◽  
Takeki Ogitsu ◽  
Wen-Po Chiang
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Heavy Duty Vehicles

Study on Stop-and-Go Cruise Control of Heavy-Duty Vehicles

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Bin ◽  
Keqiang Li ◽  
Hiroshi Ukawa ◽  
Masatoshi Handa
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Stop And Go ◽  
Heavy Duty Vehicles

scholarly journals Fuel-Efficient Driving Strategies for Heavy-Duty Vehicles: A Platooning Approach Based on Speed Profile Optimization

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sina Torabi ◽  
Mattias Wahde
Keyword(s):  
Speed Profile ◽  
Fuel Reduction ◽  
Heavy Duty ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Fuel Savings ◽  
Percentage Points ◽  
Profile Optimization ◽  
Layer Control ◽  
Lead Vehicle ◽  
Heavy Duty Vehicles

A method for reducing the fuel consumption of a platoon of heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) is described and evaluated in simulations for homogeneous and heterogeneous platoons. The method, which is based on speed profile optimization and is referred to as P-SPO, was applied to a set of road profiles of 10 km length, resulting in fuel reduction of 15.8% for a homogeneous platoon and between 16.8% and 17.4% for heterogeneous platoons of different mass configurations, relative to the combination of standard cruise control (for the lead vehicle) and adaptive cruise control (for the follower vehicle). In a direct comparison with MPC-based approaches, it was found that P-SPO outperforms the fuel savings of such methods by around 3 percentage points for the entire platoon, in similar settings. In P-SPO, unlike most common platooning approaches, each vehicle within the platoon receives its own optimized speed profile, thus eliminating the intervehicle distance control problem. Moreover, the P-SPO approach requires only a simple vehicle controller, rather than the two-layer control architecture used in MPC-based approaches.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document