scholarly journals Nutrient Removal Efficiencies of <i>Chlorella vulgaris</i> from Urban Wastewater for Reduced Eutrophication

2017 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravipratap Singh ◽  
Rohan Birru ◽  
G. Sibi
Keyword(s):  
Chlorella Vulgaris ◽  
Nutrient Removal ◽  
Urban Wastewater ◽  
Removal Efficiencies

scholarly journals Biomass Production and Nutrient Removal by Chlorella vulgaris from Anaerobic Digestion Effluents

Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcin Dębowski ◽  
Paulina Rusanowska ◽  
Marcin Zieliński ◽  
Magda Dudek ◽  
Zdzisława Romanowska-Duda
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Biomass Production ◽  
Chlorella Vulgaris ◽  
Nutrient Removal

Nutrient removal by alginate‐immobilized Chlorella vulgaris : response to different wastewater matrices

2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 1790-1799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Kube ◽  
Ben Spedding ◽  
Li Gao ◽  
Linhua Fan ◽  
Felicity Roddick
Keyword(s):  
Chlorella Vulgaris ◽  
Nutrient Removal

A pilot bioretention system with commercial activated carbon and river sediment-derived biochar for enhanced nutrient removal from stormwater

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 707-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Sang ◽  
Miansong Huang ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Wu Che ◽  
Huichao Sun
Keyword(s):  
Activated Carbon ◽  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Nutrient Removal ◽  
River Sediment ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Column Experiment ◽  
Average Mass ◽  
Mass Removal ◽  
The Media ◽  
Removal Efficiencies

Abstract Bioretention is an effective technology for urban stormwater management, but the nutrient removal in conventional bioretention systems is highly variable. Thus, a pilot bioretention column experiment was performed to evaluate the nutrient control of systems with commercial activated carbon and river sediment-derived biochar. Significant chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total phosphorus (TP) leaching were found with the addition of activated carbon and biochar, but total nitrogen (TN) leaching was significantly improved when activated carbon was used as the medium. During a semi-synthetic runoff experiment, the bioretention systems containing two types of fluvial biochar showed relatively better COD and TN control (average mass removal efficiencies and cumulative removal efficiencies) than commercial activated carbon. However, the average TP mass removal efficiency with commercial activated carbon (95% ± 3%) was significantly higher than biochar (48% ± 20% and 56 ± 14%). The addition of biochar in the media increased the nitrogen removal efficiency, and the addition of activated carbon significantly increased the phosphorous removal efficiency. Therefore, both biochar and activated carbon are effective materials for bioretention, and fluvial biochar provides an alternative approach to comprehensively utilize river sediment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document