Pharmaceutical patent protection: the United States and Japan in comparative perspective

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Shinya Kimura ◽  
Carlyn A Burton
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
The United States ◽  
Comparative Perspective ◽  
Pharmaceutical Patent

scholarly journals United States : Good Ideas from Successful Cities : Regional Snapshots in Comparative Perspective

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Turner
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Immigrant Integration ◽  
Comparative Perspective ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Selection Of

<div>Our main report, Good Ideas from Successful Cities: Municipal Leadership in Immigrant Integration, explores these themes through a selection of nearly 40 profiles of municipal practice and policies from cities across Canada, the U.S., Europe and Australasia. In this companion report, United States: Good Ideas from Successful Cities, we present an additional snapshot of municipal leadership and excellence in immigrant integration from cities in the United States. Each of these five city profiles includes a selection of related international city practices to encourage comparative perspective and enriched learning.</div>

Alternative Pluralisms: Israeli and American Constitutionalism in Comparative Perspective

1989 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary J. Jacobsohn
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Free Speech ◽  
The United States ◽  
Comparative Perspective ◽  
Institutional Evolution ◽  
Bill Of Rights ◽  
Alternative Models ◽  
Legal Development ◽  
New Politics ◽  
American Model

Constitutional transplantation, the process by which the constitutional practice of one society becomes an important source for the legal development of another, has figured importantly in the institutional evolution of new politics. In this article, I examine the constitutional experience of Israel and the United States, two societies that share a language of jurisprudential discourse while differing significantly in a number of polically relevant ways. In particular, the fact that both societies can be described as pluralistic only conceals the fact that they represent alternative models of pluralism that may render problematic the the transferablity of constitutional outcomes from one place to another. Thus, the literature of modern constitutionalism, which has tended to emphasize the rights-based liberal ethic of individualism, is arguably more compatible with an American model in which the principles of the “procedural republic” are more unproblematically embraced. To pursue this question, I look at two issues—the advisability of adopting a bill of rights and the appropriate stance of the regime on the question of free speech—that allow us to reflect upon the limits and possibilities of constitutional transplantation.

Nonconstitutional Amendments

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Albert
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
South Africa ◽  
The United States ◽  
Comparative Perspective ◽  
Constitutional Amendment ◽  
Constitutional Change ◽  
Constitutional Democracy ◽  
Liberal Democratic ◽  
Perspective Drawing ◽  
Peculiar Phenomenon

The constitutional text in a constitutional democracy does not necessarily constrain constitutional change. Quite the contrary, constitutional change in a constitutional democracy often occurs in ways that depart from the rigid procedures governing constitutional amendment enshrined in the text of the constitutional.In this article, I illuminate this peculiar phenomenon in comparative perspective, drawing from the constitutional traditions of Canada, Germany, India, South Africa and the United States. In addition to illuminating distinctions in the amendment practices of liberal democratic constitutional states, I deploy those contrasts as a springboard to substantive insights about fundamental principles of statehood, namely sovereignty and legitimacy.

“Conjoint Gas and Mechanical Action as Applied to Flight”

1884 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 96-100
Author(s):  
Fred. W. Brearey
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
The United States ◽  
Mechanical Action ◽  
United States Patent ◽  
Model Form ◽  
Patent Laws ◽  
States Patent ◽  
Mechanical Arrangement ◽  
Made In

The remarks made in this paper are due to the action of the United States Patent Laws, as interpreted by one of the examiners, whose duty it was to adjudicate upon the practicability of an invention submitted to him, and whose decision was adverse to the granting of a patent. Protection was solicited for an improvement upon a previously patented mechanical aërial machine, the success of which had been proved by the inventor through the action of a model. The patent was refused on account of the alleged impracticability of the invention owing to the absence of gas as a supporting, or partly supporting, medium. Total misapprehension of the principles of flight is displayed whenever the balloon is recommended to take off part of the weight of any mechanical arrangement. However successfully the pure mechanical action may have proved itself in the conveyance of weights in the air whilst in the model form, the principle seems to be distrusted by some when proposed for extreme weight. But it fortunately happens that the resistance of the air to a body in motion, upon which we depend for success, bears a greatly increasing ratio to the extent of surface which that body assumes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document