Implications of late fall and early spring 2,4-D applications on subsequent canola production on Black, Dark Brown and Gray Wooded Soil

1997 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 699-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Kirkland
Keyword(s):  
Weed Management ◽  
Growth And Development ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Brassica Napus L ◽  
Green Seed ◽  
Late Fall ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Annual Weeds ◽  
Fall Application ◽  
Made In

Late fall or early spring application of 2,4-D to control winter annual weeds prior to canola has not been recommended as the herbicidal effects on canola growth and development on varying soil types are not well defined. 2,4-D was applied to Black, Dark Brown and Gray Wooded soils located in west-central and northwest Saskatchewan. Applications were made in the fall and early spring prior to planting Brassica napus L. and Brassica rapa L. canola from 1992 to 1994 at the recommended (0.42 kg ha−1) and twice the recommended rate. The rate of 2,4-D applied had no effect on canola plant population, pods per plant, yield, green seed, chlorophyll, kernel or test weight. Application of 2,4-D in the fall had no effect on any variable while spring application reduced plant stands and increased green content but had no effect on pod production, yield or chlorophyll content. Late fall application of 2,4-D prior to canola in rotation should be recognized as a valuable addition to weed management in canola, particularly when direct seeding is practised. Key words: Canola, 2,4-D, soil residual, injury

Fall and Spring Preplant Herbicide Applications Influence Spring Emergence of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza canadensis)

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vince M. Davis ◽  
Greg R. Kruger ◽  
Bryan G. Young ◽  
William G. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Early Spring ◽  
Late Spring ◽  
Conyza Canadensis ◽  
No Till ◽  
Early Fall ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Winter Annual Weeds ◽  
Annual Weeds ◽  
Spring Emergence ◽  
Residual Control

Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) is a common weed in no-till crop production systems. It is problematic because of the frequent occurrence of biotypes resistant to glyphosate and acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides and its ability to complete its life cycle as a winter or summer annual weed. Tactics to control horseweed while controlling other winter annual weeds routinely fail; herbicide application timing and spring emergence patterns of horseweed may be responsible. The objectives of this experiment were to (1) determine the influence of fall and spring herbicides with and without soil residual horseweed activity on spring-emerging glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed density and (2) evaluate the efficacy and persistence of saflufenacil on GR horseweed. Field studies were conducted in southern Indiana and Illinois from fall 2006 to summer 2007 and repeated in 2007 to 2008. Six preplant herbicide treatments were applied at four application timings: early fall, late fall, early spring, and late spring. Horseweed plants were counted every 2 wk following the first spring application until the first week of July. Horseweed almost exclusively emerged in the spring at both locations. Spring horseweed emergence was higher when 2,4-D + glyphosate was fall-applied and controlled other winter annual weeds. With fall-applied 2,4-D + glyphosate, over 90% of the peak horseweed density was observed before April 25. In contrast, only 25% of the peak horseweed density was observed in the untreated check by April 25. Starting from the initiation of horseweed emergence in late March, chlorimuron + tribenuron applied early fall or early spring, and spring-applied saflufenacil at 100 g ai/ha provided greater than 90% horseweed control for 12 wk. Early spring–applied saflufenacil at 50 g ai/ha provided 8 wk of greater than 90% residual control, and early spring–applied simazine provided 6 wk of greater than 90% control. When applied in late spring, saflufenacil was the only herbicide treatment that reduced horseweed densities by greater than 90% compared to 2,4-D + glyphosate. We concluded from this research that fall applications of nonresidual herbicides can increase the rate and density of spring emerging horseweed. In addition, spring-applied saflufenacil provides no-till producers with a new preplant herbicide for foliar and residual control of glyphosate- and ALS-resistant horseweed.

Interference of Annual Weeds in Seedling Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Weed Science ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 583-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert J. Fischer ◽  
Jean H. Dawson ◽  
Arnold P. Appleby
Keyword(s):  
Medicago Sativa ◽  
Bromus Tectorum ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Amaranthus Retroflexus ◽  
Downy Brome ◽  
Weed Interference ◽  
Alfalfa Hay ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Annual Weeds

Barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli(L.) Beauv. #4ECHCG] and pigweeds (mixture ofAmaranthus retroflexusL. # AMARE andA. powelliiS. Wats. # AMAPO) seeded separately with alfalfa (Medicago sativaL.) in mid-August suppressed alfalfa severely before frost killed them in October and November. Some alfalfa was killed, and yield of alfalfa forage was reduced in each of three harvests the following year. These weeds did not harm alfalfa seeded in mid-September. Downy brome (Bromus tectorumL. # BROTE) and tumble mustard (Sisymbrium altissimumL. # SSYAL) suppressed alfalfa seeded in August and September. They reduced alfalfa stands and reduced yield of alfalfa forage in each of three harvests the following year. Alfalfa seeded August 27 and allowed to compete with a mixture of these species for various periods was injured most by weeds that emerged with the alfalfa and remained uncontrolled until forage harvest in May. These weeds did not reduce alfalfa yields if removed by 36 days after alfalfa emergence. Thereafter, yield decreased as the period of weed interference increased. Interference was most damaging in early spring, when growth of winter annual weeds was rapid and vigorous. Weeds seeded 65 or more days after alfalfa emergence did not reduce alfalfa yields but sometimes produced enough biomass to reduce the quality of the first-cutting alfalfa hay.

scholarly journals Winter Annual Rye Seeding Date Influence on Nitrogen Recovery and Ammonia Volatilization from Late Fall Surface-Applied Manure

Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parisa Akbari ◽  
Stephen Herbert ◽  
Masoud Hashemi ◽  
Allen Barker ◽  
Omid Reza Zandvakili ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cover Crop ◽  
Ammonia Volatilization ◽  
Ammonia Emission ◽  
Winter Rye ◽  
Planting Dates ◽  
Manure Application ◽  
Late Fall ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Forage Rape ◽  
Fall Application

Dairy farmers in the northeast face challenges in the application of manure in fall and on-time planting of cool-season grasses to maximize recovery of residual N and nutrients released from fall applied manure. Ammonia emission from animal manure is a serious environmental concern and can be reduced if cover crop is integrated in the farming system. On-time planting of cover crops can reduce ammonia volatilization from fall, surface-applied manure, and prevents N loss to leaching. A two-year study was conducted in 2015 and 2016 to investigate if time of planting of winter annual rye (Secale cereale L.) along with late fall application of manure when air temperature is low can influence ammonia emission and preserve nitrogen (N) to meet the N requirement of forage rape. Three planting dates (16 September, 30 September, and 14 October) of rye cover crop with two manure application treatments including late-fall application and no manure were assessed for mitigating ammonia volatilization, and also yield and recovery of N by forage rape (Brassica napus L.). The highest rates of ammonia volatilization were detected in the first 24 hours after manure spreading regardless of the treatment. The result indicated that cover crop use significantly limited volatilization compared with no cover crop. The earliest planting date produced 3823 kg ha−1 dry matter of winter rye cover crop that was 16 and 35 percent higher than second and third dates of planting, respectively. The manured cover crop accumulated 132 kg N ha−1 when planted early. However, biomass yield of forage rape was more when planted after all cover crop treatments with manure application. Prior to forage planting, the nitrate-N content in all three soil depths (0–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm) in the plots with manure was higher than plots with no manure. No significant differences in forage rape yield was detected among winter rye planting dates; however, forage rape planted after winter rye was higher than after no-cover crop. The results of this study suggest that when immediate incorporation of manure into soil is not feasible, establishing cover crop early and then applying manure in the late fall, is a practical management to limit nonpoint source pollution from ammonia loss.

Buckwheat Residue Effects on Emergence and Growth of Weeds in Winter-Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Cropping Systems

Weed Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 567-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virender Kumar ◽  
Daniel C. Brainard ◽  
Robin R. Bellinder ◽  
Russell R. Hahn
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Cropping Systems ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
Bare Soil ◽  
Weed Species ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Winter Annual Weeds ◽  
Annual Weeds

Field and pot studies were conducted in Central New York to determine the potential weed-management benefits of a buckwheat cover crop grown before winter wheat. Specific objectives were to determine buckwheat residue effects on (1) emergence and growth of winter annual weeds; (2) wheat establishment and yield; and (3) emergence of summer annual weeds in the spring following overwinter seed burial. In a field study, buckwheat was sown at two timings (July or August), mowed, and either incorporated or left on the soil surface. Winter wheat was drilled into buckwheat residue in September and weed and crop growth were monitored. In a complementary pot study, four winter annual weeds were sown in soil removed from buckwheat and bare-soil plots at 0 or 15 d after incorporation and monitored for emergence and early growth. To assess buckwheat residue effects on spring emergence from overwintering seeds, seeds of three weed species were buried in buckwheat residue and bare-soil plots in the fall, exhumed in April, and evaluated for emergence. To investigate the mechanism for possible effects of buckwheat residue on overwintering seeds, two levels each of seed treatment (none or fungicide) and fertilization (none or 170 kg ha−1) were applied before burial. Buckwheat residue had no negative effect on wheat yields but suppressed emergence (22 to 72%) and growth (0 to 95%) of winter annual weeds, although effects were often small and inconsistent. Buckwheat residue had no effect on the emergence of buried weed seeds in spring. However, fungicide treatment enhanced the emergence of Powell amaranth seeds by 12.5 to 25.5% and of barnyardgrass seeds by 0 to 12%. Our results suggest that buckwheat residue can contribute to weed management in wheat cropping systems, but that further studies investigating the mechanistic basis for the inconsistent selective effects of buckwheat residue on weeds are needed before buckwheat use can be optimized.

Postemergence Winter Weed Control in Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) Turf

Weed Science ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Cynodon Dactylon ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Combination Treatments ◽  
Anisic Acid ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Annual Weeds ◽  
Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid ◽  
Made In

Several herbicides were applied in January, February, and March with a comparison of the intervals of treatment of 2 and 4 weeks after the initial treatment each month for postemergence control of winter annual weeds in bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon(L.) Pers.] turf. Glyphosphate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] treatments applied at 2-week intervals with the initial treatment made in January or February controlled a higher percentage of annual bluegrass (Poa annuaL.) than when applied in March. Hop clover (Trifolium agrariumL.) control was also higher when glyphosate was initially applied in January or February than when applied in March regardless of time interval between first and second treatment. Combination treatments of (a) 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] + dicamba (3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid) and (b) 2,4-D + mecoprop {2-[(4-chloro-o-tolyl)oxy] propionic acid} + dicamba applied at 2-week intervals with the initial treatment made in January or February controlled more corn speedwell (Veronica arvensisL.) and hop clover than when applied in March. Highest henbit (Lamium amplexicauleL.) control was obtained from the combination 2,4-D treatments made at 4-week intervals when initial treatment was made in February and March. Weed control was not influenced by dates and interval of repeated treatments with either paraquat (1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ion) or atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] treatments. Germination and regrowth of weeds were greater in plots treated with glyphosate and paraquat initially in January or February than other herbicide-treated plots. Weeds were not reestablished in any of the atrazine-treated plots. Paraquat and combinations of 2,4-D + dicamba or 2,4-D + mecoprop + dicamba injured bermudagrass when applied initially in January and February even though they were applied to turf that appeared dormant. All herbicides injured bermudagrass more when applied to semi-dormant turf in March than to dormant turf in January or February. Atrazine affected bermudagrass less than any of the other herbicides tested when initial treatment was applied in March to semi-dormant turf.

A review of the recruitment biology of winter annual weeds in Canada

2009 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 575-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Z.H. Cici ◽  
R. C. Van Acker
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Seed Longevity ◽  
Plant Vigour ◽  
Seed Biology ◽  
Winter Annuals ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Winter Annual Weeds ◽  
Annual Weeds

Typically, summer annual weeds have been the primary management target for field crop farmers in Canada, but with changes in cropping systems and with acknowledged global climate change there will be an increasing need to consider the management of species that are present very early in the spring, including winter annual weeds. Knowledge of weed recruitment biology and emergence patterns can be used to guide weed management practices. A review was conducted of the recruitment biology of winter annual weeds in Canada. The key finding was that all of the significant winter annual weeds in Canadian agriculture are facultative, with the majority of species emerging at two peak periods, April-May and September-October. For the weed species included in this review, the information available on recruitment and seed biology was far from comprehensive, and for some species there was very little published information, in particular on specific base temperatures for germination, documented field-based emergence periods and data that could be used to create simple predictive population dynamics models, including fecundity (× environment), seed longevity and overwintering probability. This is particularly true with respect to information in Canadian agricultural contexts. A number of questions result from this review, a key one being whether spring versus fall emergence creates significant differences in fundamental biological characteristics of winter annual weeds including seed dormancy status, microsite requirements, phenology, plant vigour and competitive ability. Given that none of the winter annuals in Canada are constitutive and given ongoing climate change, farmers in Canada should be careful not to encourage summer annuals to become winter annuals. Movement away from fall weed management, including tillage and repeated sowing of winter annual crops will encourage facultative winter annual behaviour. In addition, farmers should be wary of invasion by populations of persistent winter annuals including stinkweed, chickweed and American dragonhead.Key words: Facultative winter annual, dormancy, microsites, emergence pattern, seed rain, seed longevity, weed management

AGRONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF SPRING WHEAT, BARLEY, AND OATS SOWN IN LATE FALL AND EARLY SPRING IN WESTERN CANADA

1972 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-187
Author(s):  
H. M. AUSTENSON
Keyword(s):  
Common Wheat ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Western Canada ◽  
Agronomic Performance ◽  
Wheat Cultivars ◽  
Grain Yields ◽  
Late Fall ◽  
The One ◽  
Made In

Over a 4-year period, four cultivars of wheat, two of barley, and two of oats were sown shortly before the soil was continuously frozen in the fall (average date October 28) and soon after land could be prepared in the spring (average date May 8). Fall-sown wheat emerged in the spring each year, and in 2 of the 4 years outyielded spring-sown wheat. Mainly because of 1 very poor year fall-sown wheat yields averaged 20% lower than spring-sown. Increased seeding rates were partially effective in improving stands of fall-sown wheat. Common wheat cultivars were better adapted to fall-seeding than the one durum cultivar tested. Heading and maturity dates were 4–7 days earlier in fall-sown than in early spring-sown wheat. Fall-sown barley and oats emerged in the spring in only 2 of the 4 years. In these 2 years grain yields of fall-sown barley were reduced 22% and oats 17% as compared with spring seeding. Heading and maturity dates of barley and oats were from 0 to 4 days earlier in seedings made in the fall.

Post-harvest Management of Tobacco Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Overwintering in Peanut Fields

1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Chamberlin ◽  
J. W. Todd ◽  
A. K. Culbreath ◽  
W. C. Johnson ◽  
J. W. Demski
Keyword(s):  
Early Spring ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Harvest Management ◽  
Post Harvest ◽  
Peanut Crop ◽  
Survival And Reproduction ◽  
Tobacco Thrips ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Winter Annual Weeds ◽  
Annual Weeds

A combination of fallow tillage and a March application of carbofuran were assessed as tactics for decreasing survival and reproduction of tobacco thrips overwintering in six harvested peanut fields. Large numbers of tobacco thrips, Frankliniella fusca (Hinds) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), developed in three fields on volunteer peanut, Arachis hypogaea L., and winter annual weeds. Adult tobacco thrips collected during the late winter were predominantly brachypterous, with percent brachyptery averaging 71–95% for females. Brachypterous adults tended to be more abundant in fields harvested in September than in those harvested in October. Disking during November and February greatly reduced the density of volunteer peanut and winter annual weeds but did not measurably decrease abundance of brachypterous tobacco thrips. Carbofuran application reduced abundance of brachypterous adults and thrips larvae on volunteer peanut by 85–100% during the early spring. Post-harvest tillage and carbofuran application did not measurably reduce incidence of tomato spotted wilt virus in the subsequent peanut crop. Implications for winter ecology and management of spotted wilt are discussed.

Effect of 2,4-D and Dicamba Residues on Following Crops in Conservation Tillage Systems

1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Moyer ◽  
Peter Bergen ◽  
G. Bruce Schaalje
Keyword(s):  
Dry Matter ◽  
Conservation Tillage ◽  
Residual Effect ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Slight Reduction ◽  
Dry Matter Yield ◽  
Tillage Systems ◽  
Late Fall ◽  
Field Pennycress ◽  
Winter Annual

Dicamba and 2,4-D, which are used prior to seeding in conservation tillage systems, were applied in late fall and early spring to determine their residual effect on subsequent spring-seeded crops. The herbicides 2,4-D ester and 2,4-D amine with dicamba or glyphosate, applied 0 or 15 d prior to spring seeding, damaged canola, peas, lentils, and alfalfa. The legumes were damaged by spring-applied dicamba. There was also a slight reduction in the total dry matter yield of wheat and barley by 2,4-D applied in spring prior to seeding. All crops tested, except lentils, were tolerant of recommended fall applications of 2,4-D for the control of winter annual flixweed and field pennycress.

Preplant and Residual Herbicide Application Timings for Weed Control in No-Till Soybean

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt M. Vollmer ◽  
Mark J. VanGessel ◽  
Quintin R. Johnson ◽  
Barbara A. Scott
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Herbicide Application ◽  
Emergence Period ◽  
No Till ◽  
Winter Annual ◽  
Winter Annual Weeds ◽  
Annual Weeds ◽  
Residual Herbicide ◽  
Application Programs

AbstractTimely herbicide applications for no-till soybean can be challenging given the diverse communities of both winter and summer annual weeds that are often present. Research was conducted to compare various approaches for nonselective and preplant weed control for no-till soybean. Nonselective herbicide application timings of fall (with and without a residual herbicide) followed by early-spring (4 wk before planting), late-spring (1 to 2 wk before planting), or sequential-spring applications (4 wk before planting and at planting) were compared. Spring applications also included a residual herbicide. For consistent control of winter annual weeds, two herbicide applications were needed, either a fall application followed by a spring application or sequential-spring applications. When a fall herbicide application did not include a residual herbicide, greater winter annual weed control resulted from early- or sequential-spring treatments. However, application timings that effectively controlled winter annual weeds did not effectively control summer annual weeds that have a prolonged emergence period. Palmer amaranth and large crabgrass control at 4 wk after planting was better when the spring residual treatment (chlorimuron plus metribuzin) was applied 1 to 2 wk before planting or at planting, compared with 4 wk before planting. Results indicate that in order to optimize control, herbicide application programs in soybean should coincide with seasonal growth cycles of winter and summer annual weeds.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document