In situ determination of the water desorption characteristics of peat substrates

1993 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Paquet ◽  
J. Caron ◽  
O. Banton

Knowledge of water desorption characteristics of peat substrates is of primary importance in horticulture. However, these characteristics are difficult to measure as they are influenced by sample preparation, particularly when samples are obtained from potted substrates containing growing plants. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of sample preparation on the water desorption characteristics of peat substrates and to propose an alternative method to limit sample disturbance. This study shows that water desorption characteristics of peat substrates obtained using Tempe cells differ from those obtained using pots and a tension table apparatus. However, the latter method is time and resource consuming. An alternative method for routine and rapid determination of water desorption characteristics of undisturbed samples was tested. Measurements of water potential (ψh) in pots were obtained using tensiometers. Volumetric water content (θ) was measured by time domain reflectometry (TDR), a non-destructive in situ method commonly used for mineral soil characterization. The technique measures the apparent dielectric constant of the soil (ka) and empirically relates it to θ. Empirical relationships between θ and ka were derived for three different peat substrates. Using these relationships, water desorption characteristics (θ versus ψh) were derived for three substrates in laboratory experiments and compared to water desorption characteristics obtained using a tension table to establish different ψh and a gravimetric determination of θ. The approach using TDR and tensiometers appears to be reliable, fast and to allow large number of simultaneous water characteristic determinations. Key words: Water characteristics, water release curve, time domain reflectometry, peat sustrates

2018 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 118-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengchao Tian ◽  
Yili Lu ◽  
Tusheng Ren ◽  
Robert Horton ◽  
Joshua L. Heitman

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1131
Author(s):  
Soonkie Nam ◽  
Marte Gutierrez ◽  
Panayiotis Diplas ◽  
John Petrie

This paper critically compares the use of laboratory tests against in situ tests combined with numerical seepage modeling to determine the hydraulic conductivity of natural soil deposits. Laboratory determination of hydraulic conductivity used the constant head permeability and oedometer tests on undisturbed Shelby tube and block soil samples. The auger hole method and Guelph permeameter tests were performed in the field. Groundwater table elevations in natural soil deposits with different hydraulic conductivity values were predicted using finite element seepage modeling and compared with field measurements to assess the various test results. Hydraulic conductivity values obtained by the auger hole method provide predictions that best match the groundwater table’s observed location at the field site. This observation indicates that hydraulic conductivity determined by the in situ test represents the actual conditions in the field better than that determined in a laboratory setting. The differences between the laboratory and in situ hydraulic conductivity values can be attributed to factors such as sample disturbance, soil anisotropy, fissures and cracks, and soil structure in addition to the conceptual and procedural differences in testing methods and effects of sample size.


Soil Research ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Vogeler ◽  
S. Green ◽  
A. Nadler ◽  
C. Duwig

Time domain reflectometry (TDR) was used to monitor the transport of conservative tracers in the field under transient water flow in a controlled experiment under a kiwifruit vine. A mixed pulse of chloride and bromide was applied to the soil surface of a 16 m2 plot that had been isolated from the surrounding orchard soil. The movement of this solute pulse was monitored by TDR. A total of 63 TDR probes were installed into the plot for daily measurements of both the volumetric water content (θ) and the bulk soil electrical conductivity (σa). These TDR-measured σa were converted into pore water electrical conductivities (σw) and solute concentrations using various θ–σa–σw relationships that were established in the laboratory on repacked soil. The depth-wise field TDR measurements were compared with destructive measurement of the solute concentrations at the end of the experiment. These results were also compared with predictions using a deterministic model of water and solute transport based on Richards’ equation, and the convection–dispersion equation. TDR was found to give a good indication of the shape of the solute profile with depth, but the concentration of solute was under- or over-estimated by up to 50%, depending on the θ–σa–σw relationships used. Thus TDR can be used to monitor in situ transport of contaminants. However, only rough estimates of the electrical conductivity of the soil solution can so far be obtained by TDR.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-442
Author(s):  
Raffaele Persico ◽  
Iman Farhat ◽  
Lourdes Farrugia ◽  
Sebastiano D'Amico ◽  
Charles Sammut

In this paper we propose a study regarding some possibilities that can be offered by a time domain reflectometry (TDR) probe in retrieving both dielectric and magnetic properties of materials. This technique can be of interest for several applications, among which the characterization of soil in some situations. In particular, here we propose an extension of the paper “Retrieving electric and magnetic propetries of the soil in situ: New possibilities”, presented at the IWAGPR, held in Edinburgh in 2017, and as a new contribution we will validate a transmission line model with numerical data simulated by the CST code.


2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 1354-1360
Author(s):  
Yili Lu ◽  
Xiaona Liu ◽  
Meng Zhang ◽  
Joshua Heitman ◽  
Robert Horton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document