Measuring transient solute transport through the vadoze zone using time domain reflectometry

Soil Research ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Vogeler ◽  
S. Green ◽  
A. Nadler ◽  
C. Duwig

Time domain reflectometry (TDR) was used to monitor the transport of conservative tracers in the field under transient water flow in a controlled experiment under a kiwifruit vine. A mixed pulse of chloride and bromide was applied to the soil surface of a 16 m2 plot that had been isolated from the surrounding orchard soil. The movement of this solute pulse was monitored by TDR. A total of 63 TDR probes were installed into the plot for daily measurements of both the volumetric water content (θ) and the bulk soil electrical conductivity (σa). These TDR-measured σa were converted into pore water electrical conductivities (σw) and solute concentrations using various θ–σa–σw relationships that were established in the laboratory on repacked soil. The depth-wise field TDR measurements were compared with destructive measurement of the solute concentrations at the end of the experiment. These results were also compared with predictions using a deterministic model of water and solute transport based on Richards’ equation, and the convection–dispersion equation. TDR was found to give a good indication of the shape of the solute profile with depth, but the concentration of solute was under- or over-estimated by up to 50%, depending on the θ–σa–σw relationships used. Thus TDR can be used to monitor in situ transport of contaminants. However, only rough estimates of the electrical conductivity of the soil solution can so far be obtained by TDR.

2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 145-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magnus Persson ◽  
Ronny Berndtsson

Two quasi steady-state solute transport experiments were carried out in a loamy sand under field conditions. The flux was 40 mm/d in experiment 1 and 18.7 mm/d in experiment 2. Both water content (θ) and resident concentration (Cr) measurements were taken using 64 time domain reflectometry probes at depths ranging from 0.05 to 0.90 m. The Cr measurement was calibrated in situ for each probe location in the field. The convective dispersive equation (CDE) and convective lognormal transfer function (CLT) models were fitted to the breakthrough curves (BTCs). The results indicated fingered flow, which has been shown to exist in previous studies of this soil. The finger width was larger in experiment 1 leading to smaller horizontal heterogeneity and a relatively smaller solute transport velocity. The location of the fingers was consistent between the two experiments resulting in a high correlation between the velocity and mass balance fields. Mass balance calculations showed that the solute mass integrated over depth one day after the solute application was larger than the mass balance for the entire experiment (integrated over time). The probable reason being that solutes were transported out of the measurement volume by horizontal flow across the Ap/E horizon boundary. The investigation of the transport parameters revealed that both the CDE and CLT models could be successfully used to predict most individual BTCs. Horizontally averaged global CDE and CLT models were also fitted to the data. Global solute transport was better modeled with the CDE model in experiment 1, while in experiment 2, the CLT model was better. This study clearly shows the applicability of using TDR with the in situ calibration technique in field experiments with varying water content.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document