EFFECTS OF HOUSING AND TYPE OF FORAGE ON THE RESPONSE OF PREGNANT BEEF COWS TO DIETARY ENERGY INTAKE IN WINTER

1972 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 671-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. E. LISTER ◽  
W. A. JORDAN ◽  
W. J. PIGDEN ◽  
J. M. WAUTHY ◽  
J. E. COMEAU

Pregnant hay-fed beef cows confined in an insulated, forced-air ventilated barn (In) and those in an open yard with access to a log barn (In–Out), gained weight from autumn to late winter (273 and 257 g/day for In and In–Out, respectively), compared with those out-of-doors with only a windbreak shelter (Out), which lost weight (−31 g/day) (P < 0.05), when all groups were adjusted by co-variance to the mean digestible energy (DE) intake for hay-fed cows. For grass silage-fed cows, the In groups gained 196 g/day, more (P < 0.05) than the In–Out (132 g/day), and In, and In–Out groups gained more (P < 0.05) than Out cows (−185 g/day) when all groups were adjusted to the mean DE intake for silage-fed groups. Estimated daily DE intake required for maternal maintenance and fetal growth for the period covered by this experiment (beginning 238–243 days, ending 59–75 days before parturition) was 3.10, 3.12, and 4.32 Mcal/100 kg initial weight (IW) for hay-fed cows In, In–Out, and Out, respectively, and 2.84, 3.00, and 3.91 Mcal/100 kg IW for silage-fed cows In, In–Out, and Out, respectively.

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 42-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Boardman ◽  
T. A. Wickersham ◽  
L. A. Trubenbach ◽  
J. E. Sawyer

2010 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Luana C. dos Santos ◽  
Mariana N. Pascoal ◽  
Mauro Fisberg ◽  
Isa de P. Cintra ◽  
Lígia A. Martini

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m4561
Author(s):  
R A Lewis

AbstractObjectiveTo estimate the daily dietary energy intake for me to maintain a constant body weight. How hard can it be?DesignVery introspective study.SettingAt home. In lockdown. (Except every Tuesday afternoon and Saturday morning, when I went for a run.)ParticipantsMe. n=1.Main outcome measuresMy weight, measured each day.ResultsSleeping, I shed about a kilogram each night (1.07 (SD 0.25) kg). Running 5 km, I shed about half a kilogram (0.57 (SD 0.15) kg). My daily equilibrium energy intake is about 10 000 kJ (10 286 (SD 201) kJ). Every kJ above (or below) 10 000 kJ adds (or subtracts) about 40 mg (35.4 (SD 3.2) mg).ConclusionsBody weight data show persistent variability, even when the screws of control are tightened and tightened.


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-117
Author(s):  
Christopher G. BEAN ◽  
Helen R. WINEFIELD ◽  
Amanda D. HUTCHINSON ◽  
Charli SARGENT ◽  
Zumin SHI

1969 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Davey ◽  
D. P. Morgan ◽  
C. M. Kincaid

2000 ◽  
Vol 2000 ◽  
pp. 107-107
Author(s):  
R. H. Santos Ricalde ◽  
I. J. Lean

Energy requirements for maintenance in pregnant sows increase when they are kept outdoors under temperate climates in comparison to indoors. However, there is little information on the energy requirements of breeding sows kept outdoors in tropical environments. Knowledge about the correct feeding management for pregnant sows kept outdoors will optimise the utilisation of feeding resources available in the tropics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of energy level supply during pregnancy on backfat change and liveweight change of primiparous sows kept outdoors under tropical conditions.


2004 ◽  
Vol 112 (15) ◽  
pp. 1472-1480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Odum ◽  
Helen Tinwell ◽  
Graham Tobin ◽  
John Ashby

1985 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 1164-1171 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Nelssen ◽  
A. J. Lewis ◽  
E. R. Peo ◽  
J. D. Crenshaw

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document