scholarly journals Effect of surface treatment on the dislocation resistance of prefabricated esthetic fiber posts bonded with self-adhesive resin cement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
ManuelSebastian Thomas ◽  
ShwetaElizabeth Jacob ◽  
SabahMohd Zubair ◽  
Vinod Jathanna ◽  
Ramya Shenoy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Effect Of Surface

The Role of Resin Cement on Bond Strength of Glass-fiber Posts Luted Into Root Canals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of In Vitro Studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. E31-E44 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Sarkis-Onofre ◽  
JA Skupien ◽  
MS Cenci ◽  
RR Moraes ◽  
T Pereira-Cenci
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Glass Fiber Posts

SUMMARY Because there are several ways to cement glass-fiber posts (GFPs) into root canals, there is no consensus on the best strategy to achieve high bond strengths. A systematic review was conducted to determine if there is difference in bond strength to dentin between regular and self-adhesive resin cements and to verify the influence of several variables on the retention of GFPs. This report followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. In vitro studies that investigated the bond strength of GFPs luted with self-adhesive and regular resin cements were selected. Searches were carried out in the PubMed and Scopus databases. No publication year or language limit was used, and the last search was done in October 2012. A global comparison was performed between self-adhesive and regular resin cements. Two subgroup analyses were performed: 1) Self-adhesive × Regular resin cement + Etch-and-rinse adhesive and 2) Self-adhesive × Regular resin cement + Self-etch adhesive. The analyses were carried out using fixed-effect and random-effects models. The results showed heterogeneity in all comparisons, and higher bond strength to dentin was identified for self-adhesive cements. Although the articles included in this meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity and high risk of bias, the in vitro literature seems to suggest that use of self-adhesive resin cement could improve the retention of GFPs into root canals.

Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Resin Relined Fiber Posts Cemented With Self-adhesive Resin Cement on Push-out and Microtensile Bond Strength Tests

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. E185-E195
Author(s):  
RV Machry ◽  
PE Fontana ◽  
TC Bohrer ◽  
LF Valandro ◽  
OB Kaizer
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Push Out

Clinical Relevance When luting relined fiber posts with self-adhesive cement, the surface treatment of the posts influences the adhesion of the fiber posts to root dentin. SUMMARY This study evaluated the effect of surface treatment and silanization of resin composite on the bond strength of relined fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Push-out and microtensile bond strength (MTBS) tests were performed in this study. The endodontic treatment of 80 single-rooted bovine teeth was first performed in the push- out test segment, followed by weakening the intracanal walls by diamond bur. Then, the glass fiber posts were adapted with resin composite to fill the root canals, followed by photoactivation and resin surface conditioning according to four different experimental conditions: no conditioning as control, 10% hydrofluoric acid, 35% hydrogen peroxide, or air abrasion with alumina particle (all groups were subdivided into “with silanization” or “without silanization,” thus totaling eight experimental groups). Self-adhesive resin cement was used for the post cementation. Four slices per tooth were obtained for the push-out tests. Next, 160 blocks of resin composite were first produced for the MTBS tests; their bonding surfaces were conditioned (as mentioned, ie, eight treatments), and they were cemented to each other. The 80 sets (n=10/treatment) were then cut into microbars (16/set): eight were immediately tested, while the other eight were thermocycled (12,000×) and stored (120 days) before MTBS. Failure modes and topographic analyses were performed after treatments. There was no statistically significant difference for the push-out results. In MTBS, surface treatment and silanization had a significant effect (p<0.001). Aging decreased bond strength for all groups. Considering the aged groups, air abrasion promoted the highest values and silanization improved bond strength for all treatments except air abrasion. The alumina particle air abrasion of the relining resin composite promoted the highest bond strengths when luting with self-adhesive resin cement.

The Effect of Surface Treatment on Shear Bond Strength between Y-TZP and Veneer Ceramic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 624-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Cantieri de Mello ◽  
Sandro Basso Bitencourt ◽  
Daniela Micheline dos Santos ◽  
Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira ◽  
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Effect Of Surface

scholarly journals Influence of Non-Thermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Treatment on Shear Bond Strength between Y-TZP and Self-Adhesive Resin Cement

Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 3321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae-Sung Kim ◽  
Jong-Ju Ahn ◽  
Eun-Bin Bae ◽  
Gyoo-Cheon Kim ◽  
Chang-Mo Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Atmospheric Pressure ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Atmospheric Pressure Plasma ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Pressure Plasma ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma (NTP) on shear bond strength (SBS) between yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) and self-adhesive resin cement. For this study, surface energy (SE) was calculated with cube-shaped Y-TZP specimens, and SBS was measured on disc-shaped Y-TZP specimens bonded with G-CEM LinkAce or RelyX U200 resin cylinder. The Y-TZP specimens were classified into four groups according to the surface treatment as follows: Control (no surface treatment), NTP, Sb (Sandblasting), and Sb + NTP. The results showed that the SE was significantly higher in the NTP group than in the Control group (p < 0.05). For the SBS test, in non-thermocycling, the NTP group of both self-adhesive resin cements showed significantly higher SBS than the Control group (p < 0.05). However, regardless of the cement type in thermocycling, there was no significant increase in the SBS between the Control and NTP groups. Comparing the two cements, regardless of thermocycling, the NTP group of G-CEM LinkAce showed significantly higher SBS than that of RelyX U200 (p < 0.05). Our study suggests that NTP increases the SE. Furthermore, NTP increases the initial SBS, which is higher when using G-CEM LinkAce than when using RelyX U200.

Self-Adhesive Resin Cement for Luting Glass Fiber Posts

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 417-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noéli Boscato ◽  
Tatiana Pereira-Cenci ◽  
Rafael R. Moraes
Keyword(s):  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Glass Fiber Posts ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

scholarly journals Relining effects on the push-out shear bond strength of glass fiber posts

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-233
Author(s):  
Adriana Rosado Valente ANDRIOLI ◽  
Margareth COUTINHO ◽  
Andréa Araújo de VASCONCELLOS ◽  
Milton Edson MIRANDA
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Cervical Region ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Glass Fiber Posts ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Push Out

Abstract Introduction The correct use of glass fiber posts in endodontically treated teeth is essential for the clinical success of restorative treatment. Objective This study evaluated the push-out shear bond strength of relined (R) or non-relined (NR) glass fiber posts, cemented with self-adhesive resin cement [RelyXTM U100 (U100)] and conventional resin cement [RelyXTM ARC (ARC)]. Material and method Sixty human single-rooted teeth were endodontically treated and divided into ARC-NR; U100-NR; ARC-R; U100-R groups. The teeth were sectioned into cervical, middle and apical thirds, and subjected to the push-out test. Bond strength was analyzed by the Friedman test; cement and post types were compared by the Mann Whitney test. The pattern of failures was evaluated with digital camera through images at 200x magnification, and was classified as adhesive (at the cement/dentin or cement/post interface), cohesive (cement or post), and mixed failures. Result In ARC-NR, bond strength values were higher in the cervical third; in U100-NR and ARC-R they were similar between the thirds. In U100-R, in the cervical and middle thirds the bond strength values were similar, and there was lower value in the apical third. For non-relined glass fiber posts, the highest mean bond strength values were observed with self-adhesive resin cement. Whereas, relined posts cemented with conventional resin cement had stronger cement layer in comparison with non-relined fiber posts. Conclusion The post relining technique was efficient in ARC-R. ARC-NR and U100-R showed improved bond strength in the cervical region of canal walls. The main failures were adhesive at the cement-post interface.

scholarly journals Glass fiber post treatment – does it influence resin cement bond strength?

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marciano de Freitas BORGES ◽  
Gabriela Simões TEIXEIRA ◽  
Anelise Fernandes MONTAGNER ◽  
Alexandre Henrique SUSIN
Keyword(s):  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Sodium Bicarbonate ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Surface Treatments ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Glass Fiber Posts ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement

Abstract Introduction Glass-fiber posts are used in order to improve the retention of restorations in endodontically treated teeth. Objective To evaluate the bond strength of glass-fiber posts submitted to different surface treatments and cemented to the root canal dentin with self-adhesive resin cement. Material and method Thirty roots of human canines were prepared and divided according to two factors: surface treatments (silane, 35% hydrogen peroxide, or sodium bicarbonate) and root thirds (cervical and middle thirds). The glass-fiber posts were cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200). After 24 h, the specimens were prepared for microtensile bond strength test (hourglass format), fracture pattern and micromorphological assessment by scanning electronic microscopy, in order to measure the cement line. Result The data (MPa and µm) were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 5%). The surface treatments influenced the bond strength of the posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (p<0.00). The mean bond strength (standard deviations) differed according to the region of root dentin (p<0.00): the cervical region (Control: 19.16MPa (3.71); Silane: 25.65MPa (4.04); Hydrogen peroxide: 24.43MPa (3.16); Sodium bicarbonate: 37.42MPa (8.27)) showed higher bond strength values than the middle third of the root (Control: 14.66MPa (4.65); Silane: 12.52MPa (5.03); Hydrogen peroxide: 10.64MPa (3.33); Sodium bicarbonate: 10.87MPa (2.49)). Conclusion Treatment of the glass-fiber post surface with chemical and physical agents increased the bond strength of the cement-post-dentin interface in the cervical third and the treatment with Sodium bicarbonate showed better results in bond strength.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document