scholarly journals Geology and geochemistry of Tetagouche Group volcanic and sedimentary rocks and related debris flows north of the Brunswick No. 12 massive-sulphide deposit, Bathurst, New Brunswick

1996 ◽  
Author(s):  
D R Lentz
Keyword(s):  
New Brunswick ◽  
Debris Flows ◽  
Sedimentary Rocks ◽  
Massive Sulphide ◽  
Massive Sulphide Deposit ◽  
Sulphide Deposit

Intense silicification of footwall sedimentary rocks in the stockwork alteration zone beneath the Brunswick No. 12 massive sulphide deposit, Bathurst, New Brunswick

1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Lentz ◽  
Wayne D. Goodfellow
Keyword(s):  
New Brunswick ◽  
Sea Water ◽  
Sedimentary Rocks ◽  
Massive Sulphide ◽  
Iron Formation ◽  
Alteration Zone ◽  
Massive Sulphide Deposit ◽  
Sulphide Deposit ◽  
Fine Grained ◽  
Balance Analysis

Intensely silicified volcaniclastic mudstones that underlie the Brunswick No. 12 massive sulphide deposit in northern New Brunswick resemble silicified rocks described in the immediate footwall of many ancient and modern massive sulphide deposits. The white to grey, cryptocrystalline silica in the silicified rocks becomes more common with proximity to the vent, and is most abundant immediately below the massive sulphide zone. Mass-balance analysis of altered footwall sedimentary rocks on the 850 m level of the mine shows that SiO2 increases up to 300%. The high silica enrichment in the feeder zone is consistent with the presence of cherty silica in the massive sulphides and in associated exhalative iron formation. Coincident with silicification are enrichments in S, FeOt, MgO, MnO, CaO, P2O5, F, Cl, Y, Cu, Co, Cr, and Ni, as well as light rare earth elements and Eu. Oxygen isotope analyses of chloritized and silicified footwall sedimentary rocks suggest that the hydrothermal fluid had a δ18O composition of approximately 4[Formula: see text] and probably was dominated by chemically modified sea water. Rapid oversaturation of the silica-bearing fluid likely explains the intensity and fine-grained nature of this silicification, although the actual mechanism for this oversaturation is uncertain.

Sulphur isotope composition of the Brunswick No. 12 massive sulphide deposit, Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick: implications for ambient environment, sulphur source, and ore genesis

1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne D. Goodfellow ◽  
Jan M. Peter
Keyword(s):  
Isotope Composition ◽  
Sedimentary Rocks ◽  
Massive Sulphide ◽  
Massive Sulphide Deposit ◽  
Bacterial Reduction ◽  
Sulphide Deposit ◽  
Sulphur Isotope ◽  
Middle Ordovician ◽  
Bathurst Mining Camp ◽  
Back Arc

The Brunswick No. 12 massive sulphide deposit occurs within a Middle Ordovician bimodal volcanic and sedimentary sequence that is thought to have formed in a continental back-arc rift covered with a thick succession of carbonaceous hemipelagic and turbiditic sedimentary rocks. The deposit consists of three en echelon lenses that are zoned from Vent Complex to Bedded Ore and Bedded pyrite facies. The Bedded Ore facies has the lowest average δ34S values (14.2[Formula: see text]), but are only slightly less positive than laminated pyrite in footwall sedimentary rocks (δ34Smean = 15.1[Formula: see text]). δ34S values for the bedded sulphides show an upward increase from 14.2[Formula: see text] in Bedded Ore to 16.5[Formula: see text] in Bedded Pyrite. Average δ34S values for Vent Complex (15.8[Formula: see text]) and underlying stringer sulphides (16.1[Formula: see text]) are consistently more positive than those for Bedded Ore. In carbonaceous shales and siltstone of the Patrick Brook Formation that underlie the deposit, δ34S values that range between 13.8 and 25.6[Formula: see text], and the similarity of these values to those of the Brunswick No. 12 deposit indicate major bacterial reduction of sulphate to sulphide under closed or partly closed conditions, and that most of the S in the deposit originated from ambient sulphidic bottom waters. Furthermore, the average δ34S value for Brunswick No. 12 bedded ores lies on the Selwyn Basin pyrite evolutionary curve and indicates that anoxic conditions within the Tetagouche back-arc basin reflect a global anoxic episode. The Brunswick No. 12 deposit probably formed, therefore, by the mixing of hydrothermal metals with dissolved sulphide of seawater origin during periods of ocean anoxia. The increase of δ34S values towards the Vent Complex may reflect the addition of isotopically heavy S formed by the inorganic reduction of seawater sulphate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document