Intense silicification of footwall sedimentary rocks in the stockwork alteration zone beneath the Brunswick No. 12 massive sulphide deposit, Bathurst, New Brunswick

1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Lentz ◽  
Wayne D. Goodfellow

Intensely silicified volcaniclastic mudstones that underlie the Brunswick No. 12 massive sulphide deposit in northern New Brunswick resemble silicified rocks described in the immediate footwall of many ancient and modern massive sulphide deposits. The white to grey, cryptocrystalline silica in the silicified rocks becomes more common with proximity to the vent, and is most abundant immediately below the massive sulphide zone. Mass-balance analysis of altered footwall sedimentary rocks on the 850 m level of the mine shows that SiO2 increases up to 300%. The high silica enrichment in the feeder zone is consistent with the presence of cherty silica in the massive sulphides and in associated exhalative iron formation. Coincident with silicification are enrichments in S, FeOt, MgO, MnO, CaO, P2O5, F, Cl, Y, Cu, Co, Cr, and Ni, as well as light rare earth elements and Eu. Oxygen isotope analyses of chloritized and silicified footwall sedimentary rocks suggest that the hydrothermal fluid had a δ18O composition of approximately 4[Formula: see text] and probably was dominated by chemically modified sea water. Rapid oversaturation of the silica-bearing fluid likely explains the intensity and fine-grained nature of this silicification, although the actual mechanism for this oversaturation is uncertain.

1996 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan M. Peter ◽  
Wayne D. Goodfellow

Massive sulphides are spatially and temporally associated with iron formation (IF) and other hydrothermal sedimentary rocks in the vicinity of the Brunswick No. 12, Brunswick No. 6, and Austin Brook deposits, Bathurst Mining Camp. Sulphide-, carbonate-, oxide-, and silicate-predominant IF is present. Carbonate-predominant IF is best developed in and around the Brunswick No. 12 deposit, whereas hematite-bearing IF is absent here but prominent in the Austin Brook–Brunswick No. 6 area. The IF is composed dominantly of Si, CO2, Fe, Mn, and Ca. Minor constituents include Mg, P, Ti, Al, and S. Statistically significant interelement correlations between Eu, Fe, Mn, Pb, Zn, Cd, Au, Ca, Sr, Ba, P, CO2, and S indicate that these elements were precipitated from hydrothermal fluids vented onto the seafloor. Positive interelement correlations between Si, Ti, Al, Mg, K, Zr, rare earth elements (REE's) except Eu, Se, V, Y, Yb, Co, Ni, and Cr reflect the presence of detrital clastic mafic and aluminosilicate minerals and hydrogenous sedimentary components. Felsic volcanic and pyroclastic rocks are considered to be the source for the detritus. REE patterns of IF at Brunswick No. 12 display similarities with those of modern high-temperature hydrothermal vent solutions, sea water, and host rhyolitic tuff and sedimentary rocks. These patterns are largely controlled by the relative proportions of hydrothermal and detrital components. The IF formed from reduced hydrothermal fluids vented into a stratified marine basin. The mineral precipitates were widely dispersed from the sites of venting and massive sulphide accumulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document