scholarly journals Marine Seismic Reflection Data Processing

1974 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Heffler
Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 341-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao‐Gui Miao ◽  
Wooil M. Moon ◽  
B. Milkereit

A multioffset, three‐component vertical seismic profiling (VSP) experiment was carried out in the Sudbury Basin, Ontario, as a part of the LITHOPROBE Sudbury Transect. The main objectives were determination of the shallow velocity structure in the middle of the Sudbury Basin, development of an effective VSP data processing flow, correlation of the VSP survey results with the surface seismic reflection data, and demonstration of the usefulness of the VSP method in a crystalline rock environment. The VSP data processing steps included rotation of the horizontal component data, traveltime inversion for velocity analysis, Radon transform for wavefield separation, and preliminary analysis of shear‐wave data. After wavefield separation, the flattened upgoing wavefields for both P‐waves and S‐waves display consistent reflection events from three depth levels. The VSP-CDP transformed section and corridor stacked section correlate well with the high‐resolution surface reflection data. In addition to obtaining realistic velocity models for both P‐ and S‐waves through least‐square inversion and synthetic seismic modeling for the Chelmsford area, the VSP experiment provided an independent estimation for the reflector dip using three component hodogram analysis, which indicates that the dip of the contact between the Chelmsford and Onwatin formations, at an approximate depth of 380 m in the Chelmsford borehole, is approximately 10.5° southeast. This study demonstrates that multioffset, three‐component VSP experiments can provide important constraints and auxiliary information for shallow crustal seismic studies in crystalline terrain. Thus, the VSP technique bridges the gap between the surface seismic‐reflection technique and well‐log surveys.


Geophysics ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 122-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. J. Hardy ◽  
M. R. Warner ◽  
R. W. Hobbs

The many techniques that have been developed to remove multiple reflections from seismic data all leave remnant energy which can cause ambiguity in interpretation. The removal methods are mostly based on periodicity (e.g., Sinton et al., 1978) or the moveout difference between primary and multiple events (e.g., Schneider et al., 1965). They work on synthetic and selected field data sets but are rather unsatisfactory when applied to high‐amplitude, long‐period multiples in marine seismic reflection data acquired in moderately deep (700 m to 3 km) water. Differential moveout is often better than periodicity at discriminating between types of events because, while a multiple series may look periodic to the eye, it is only exactly so on zero‐offset reflections from horizontal layers. The technique of seismic event labeling described below works by returning offset information from CDP gathers to a stacked section by color coding, thereby discriminating between seismic reflection events by differential normal moveout. Events appear as a superposition of colors; the direction of color fringes indicates whether an event has been overcorrected or undercorrected for its hyperbolic normal moveout.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document